Punitive Damages (häftad)
Format
Häftad (Paperback / softback)
Språk
Engelska
Antal sidor
285
Utgivningsdatum
2003-09-01
Upplaga
2nd ed.
Förlag
University of Chicago Press
Medarbetare
etc.
Illustrationer
6 line drawings, 38 tables
Dimensioner
230 x 155 x 20 mm
Vikt
420 g
Antal komponenter
1
ISBN
9780226780153
Punitive Damages (häftad)

Punitive Damages

How Juries Decide

Häftad Engelska, 2003-09-01
569
Skickas inom 7-10 vardagar.
Fri frakt inom Sverige för privatpersoner.
Finns även som
  • Laddas ned direkt
    449
  • Skickas inom 11-20 vardagar (specialorder)
    709
Visa alla 2 format & utgåvor
Over the past two decades, the United States has seen a dramatic increase in the number and magnitude of punitive damages verdicts rendered by juries in civil trials. Probably the most extraordinary example is the July 2000 award of $144.8 billion in the Florida class action lawsuit brought against the cigarette manufacturers. More puzzling were two recent verdicts against the auto manufacturer BMW in Alabama. In identical cases, argued in the same court before the same judge, one jury awarded $4 million in punitive damages, while the other awarded no punitive damages at all. In cases involving accidents, civil rights and the environment, multimillion dollar punitive awards have been a subject of intense controversy. But how do juries actually make decisions about punitive damages? To find out, the authors - specialists in psychology, economics and the law - present the results of controlled experiments with over 600 mock juries involving the responses of more than 8,000 jury-eligible citizens. They find that although juries tended to agree in their moral judgements about the defendant's conduct, they rendered erratic and unpredictable dollar awards. Jurors also tended to ignore instructions from the judges; showed "hindsight bias", believing that what happened should have been foreseen; and penalized corporations that had based their decisions on careful cost-benefit analyses. While judges made many of the same errors, they performed better in some areas, suggesting that judges (or other specialists) may be better equipped than juries to decide punitive damages. With a wealth of new data and a host of provocative findings, this book documents a wide range of systematic bias in jury behaviour and should be valuable for anyone interested in punitive damages, jury behaviour, human psychology and the theory of punishment.
Visa hela texten

Passar bra ihop

  1. Punitive Damages
  2. +
  3. Choosing Not to Choose

De som köpt den här boken har ofta också köpt Choosing Not to Choose av Cass R Sunstein (häftad).

Köp båda 2 för 738 kr

Kundrecensioner

Har du läst boken? Sätt ditt betyg »

Bloggat om Punitive Damages

Övrig information

Cass R. Sunstein is the Karl N. Llewellyn Distinguished Service Professor of Jurisprudence in the Law School and the Department of Political Science at the University of Chicago. Reid Hastie is a professor of behavioral science in the Graduate School of Business at the University of Chicago. John W. Payne is the Joseph J. Ruvane Jr. Professor of Management, professor of psychology, and research professor of statistics and decision sciences at the Fuqua School of Business at Duke University. David A. Schkade is the Herbert D. Kelleher Regents Professor of Business at the University of Texas at Austin. W. Kip Viscusi is the John F. Cogan Jr. Professor of Law and Economics at Harvard Law School.