A Functional Analysis of Acclaiming, Attacking, and Defending
De som köpt den här boken har ofta också köpt Troubled av Rob Henderson (inbunden).
Köp båda 2 för 1580 krWILLIAM L. BENOIT is Professor of Communication at the University of Missouri. He has published numerous articles and three books, including Candidates in Conflict: Persuasive Attack and Defense in the 1992 Presidential Debates (1996, with William T. Wells). JOSEPH R. BLANEY is an Assistant Professor of Mass Communication at Northwest Missouri State University. He has published, with Benoit, in The Journal of Communication and Religion. P. M. PIER is a doctoral candidate in the Department of Communication at the University of Missouri. She has published, with Benoit and Blaney, in Communication Quarterly.
Series Foreword by Robert E. Denton, Jr. Preface Introduction Overview: A Functional Theory of Political Campaign Discourse Method: Acclaiming, Attacking, and Defending Procedures: How We Analyzed Campaign '96 Messages Republican Primaries: Who Shall Lead Us? Debates: A Free-for-All Television Advertisements: "I'm More Conservative Than You" Talk Radio: What Are the Candidates Saying about Each Other? Nominating Conventions: Anointing the Chosen Keynote Speeches: It's Great to Be a Republican/Democrat! Acceptance Addresses: "I Will Lead Us to Victory" Stand By Your Man: Elizabeth Dole's and Hillary Rodham Clinton's Convention Speeches General Election Campaign: The Final Showdown Televised Advertisements: Dole/Gingrich versus the Liberals Radio Addresses: Hear Ye, Hear Ye Debates: Direct Confrontation Free Television Remarks: Their Unfiltered Utterances Conclusion and Implications Outcomes: Who Won (and by How Much)? Implications: What Have We Learned? References Index