EU Courts, Boards of Appeal, Ombudsman
De som köpt den här boken har ofta också köpt Who's Afraid of Gender? av Judith Butler (inbunden).
Köp båda 2 för 1488 krThe book is a courageous and thorough tour de force that covers the challenges and limitations faced by the EUs current court system, and how its parallel expansion through the creation of panels, boards of appeal and other adjudicative bodies has contributed to reinforce the rule of law in the EU legal order. -- Daniel Sarmiento * EU Law Live * Relative Authority of Judicial and Extra-Judicial Review is a timely and impressive study the book is a success. -- Richard Kirkham, University of Sheffield * Public Law * Krajewskis conceptualization on the relative authority of bodies having judicial and extra-judicial review powers in the EU is a welcome addition to studies on the EU enforcement paradigm. Relative Authority of Judicial and Extra-Judicial Review is a must-read for those interested in the procedural pluralism intrinsic to EU institutional settings, and a thought-provoking volume for academics and members of the institutions alike. * Common Market Law Review * Krajewski offers a rich, meticulous, and carefully considered study of how extra-judicial review mechanisms complement judicial review Krajewskis book offers an impressive and inspiring take on these phenomena. Hopefully, others will pick up the exploration. -- Moritz Schramm * Review of European Administrative Law *
Michal Krajewski is Postdoctoral Research Fellow at the University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
1. Introduction I. Overview of the Book II. Beyond the Judicial Paradigm III. Putting Formal Labels Aside IV. The Books Structure 2. The Shortcomings of EU Judicial Review I. Limited Review of Uncertainty II. Deficient Judicial Expertise and Procedural Tools III. Restrictive Access IV. The Risks of Judicial Overload and Overreach V. Conclusion 3. The Bits and Pieces of Review Mechanisms I. A Change in the Methodological Approach II. The Models of Review Mechanisms III. Independence, Powers, Accessibility, Activity IV. Conclusion 4. Judicial Review: Justice and Efficiency I. Judicial Independence: Safeguards, Resources and Expertise II. The Reach of Judicial Power III. Restrictive Access and the Courts Administrative-Economic Profile IV. The Value and Cost of Procedural Activity V. Conclusion 5. Administrative Review: Cheaper, Quicker and More Thorough? I. Reconciling Independence and Proximity II. The Reach of Law and Science III. The Long Shadow of Plaumann IV. Procedural Activity in an Administrative Trial V. Conclusion 6. Ombuds-review: Justice without Binding Powers I. Independence and Political Neutrality II. Taking the Ombudsman Seriously III. A Public Interest Venue IV. Towards Greater Procedural Discretion V. Conclusion 7. Conclusions I. The Assets and Shortcomings of Extra-judicial Review II. The Rule of Law and Epistemic Uncertainty III. The Political Design of Judicial and Extra-judicial Architecture IV. Protecting the Courts from Uncertainty