974 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
974 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
974 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
1 682 kr
Skickas inom 3-6 vardagar
560 kr
Skickas inom 10-15 vardagar
763 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
232 kr
Skickas inom 3-6 vardagar
680 kr
Skickas inom 10-15 vardagar
354 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
801 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
738 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
Working in the tradition of analytic philosophy, Alexander Brown argues that many different forms of political communication (or anti-communication) that often infuriate the public can also be ethically or morally objectionable. These forms include question dodging, offering scripted answers, stonewalling, not listening, disseminating propaganda, pandering, being insincere, giving false denials, issuing revisionist interpretations, refusing to take responsibility, never apologising, boasting, and gaslighting. Brown invokes a host of normative reasons including those having to do with epistemic arrogance, interference in autonomy, and violating the right to be heard. This is not to say that, all things considered, politicians should never engage in dubious political communication. Sometimes these are necessary evils. Brown argues, however, that further moral inquiry is needed to show why they are evils, and to determine when the use of these rhetorical tactics can be excessive, unreasonable, or out of place.
Key Features: • Identifies and conceptualises forms of dubious political communication• Develops an ethical evaluation of political communication• Considers possible justifications for the use of dubious political communication• Makes practical recommendations on how to regulate unethical political communication
738 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
Working in the tradition of analytic philosophy, Alexander Brown argues that many different forms of political communication (or anti-communication) that often infuriate the public can also be ethically or morally objectionable. These forms include question dodging, offering scripted answers, stonewalling, not listening, disseminating propaganda, pandering, being insincere, giving false denials, issuing revisionist interpretations, refusing to take responsibility, never apologising, boasting, and gaslighting. Brown invokes a host of normative reasons including those having to do with epistemic arrogance, interference in autonomy, and violating the right to be heard. This is not to say that, all things considered, politicians should never engage in dubious political communication. Sometimes these are necessary evils. Brown argues, however, that further moral inquiry is needed to show why they are evils, and to determine when the use of these rhetorical tactics can be excessive, unreasonable, or out of place.
Key Features: • Identifies and conceptualises forms of dubious political communication• Develops an ethical evaluation of political communication• Considers possible justifications for the use of dubious political communication• Makes practical recommendations on how to regulate unethical political communication
1 191 kr
Skickas inom 11-20 vardagar
455 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
376 kr
Skickas inom 11-20 vardagar
455 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
563 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
430 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
546 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
417 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
604 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
461 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
546 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
413 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
343 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
610 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
377 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
417 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
381 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
173 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
465 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar