Alexander Brown – författare
966 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
966 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
1 627 kr
Skickas inom 3-6 vardagar
549 kr
Skickas inom 10-15 vardagar
687 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
227 kr
Skickas inom 3-6 vardagar
642 kr
Skickas inom 10-15 vardagar
351 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
793 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
682 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
Working in the tradition of analytic philosophy, Alexander Brown argues that many different forms of political communication (or anti-communication) that often infuriate the public can also be ethically or morally objectionable. These forms include question dodging, offering scripted answers, stonewalling, not listening, disseminating propaganda, pandering, being insincere, giving false denials, issuing revisionist interpretations, refusing to take responsibility, never apologising, boasting, and gaslighting. Brown invokes a host of normative reasons including those having to do with epistemic arrogance, interference in autonomy, and violating the right to be heard. This is not to say that, all things considered, politicians should never engage in dubious political communication. Sometimes these are necessary evils. Brown argues, however, that further moral inquiry is needed to show why they are evils, and to determine when the use of these rhetorical tactics can be excessive, unreasonable, or out of place.
Key Features: • Identifies and conceptualises forms of dubious political communication• Develops an ethical evaluation of political communication• Considers possible justifications for the use of dubious political communication• Makes practical recommendations on how to regulate unethical political communication
682 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
Working in the tradition of analytic philosophy, Alexander Brown argues that many different forms of political communication (or anti-communication) that often infuriate the public can also be ethically or morally objectionable. These forms include question dodging, offering scripted answers, stonewalling, not listening, disseminating propaganda, pandering, being insincere, giving false denials, issuing revisionist interpretations, refusing to take responsibility, never apologising, boasting, and gaslighting. Brown invokes a host of normative reasons including those having to do with epistemic arrogance, interference in autonomy, and violating the right to be heard. This is not to say that, all things considered, politicians should never engage in dubious political communication. Sometimes these are necessary evils. Brown argues, however, that further moral inquiry is needed to show why they are evils, and to determine when the use of these rhetorical tactics can be excessive, unreasonable, or out of place.
Key Features: • Identifies and conceptualises forms of dubious political communication• Develops an ethical evaluation of political communication• Considers possible justifications for the use of dubious political communication• Makes practical recommendations on how to regulate unethical political communication
1 141 kr
Skickas inom 7-10 vardagar
452 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
373 kr
Skickas inom 7-10 vardagar
436 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
540 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
427 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
542 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
403 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
585 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
446 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
524 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
400 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
331 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
605 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
362 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
400 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
370 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
166 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
446 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar