Giovanna Borradori – författare

In this look at current debates in American philosophy, leading philosophers talk candidly about the changing character of their discipline. In the spirit of Emerson's "The American Scholar", this book explores the identity of the American philosopher. Through informal conversations, the participants discuss the rise of post-analytic philosophy in America and its relations to European thought and to the American pragmatist tradition. They comment on their own intellectual development as well as each others' work, charting the course of American philosophy over the past few decades. Giovanna Borradori, in her introduction, explains the history of the analytic movement in America and the home-grown reaction against it. In the late 19th and 20th centuries, American philosophy was a socially engaged interdisciplinary enterprise, connected to history, psychology, and public issues. But in the 1930s, logical positivism redefined philosophical discourse in terms of mathematical logic and theory of language.American philosophy became a professionalized discipline, divorced from public debate and intellectual history and antagonistic to the other, more humanistic tradition of Continental thought. The American Philosopher explores the opposition between analytic and Continental thought and shows how recent American work has begun to bridge the gap between the two traditions. Through a re-examination of pragmatism, and through an attempt to understand philosophy in a more hermeneutical way, the participants narrow the distance between America's distinctly scientific philosophy and Europe's more literary approach. Moving beyond classical analytic philosophy, the participants confront each other on a number of topics. The logico-linguistic orientations of Quine and Davidson come up against the more discursive, interdisciplinary agendas of Rorty, Putnam, and Cavell. Nozick's theory of pluralist anarchism goes face-to-face with the aesthetic neo-foundationalism of Danto. And Kuhn's hypothesis of paradigm shifts is measured against MacIntyre's ethics of "virtues."

In this lively look at current debates in American philosophy, leading philosophers talk candidly about the changing character of their discipline. In the spirit of Emerson''s The American Scholar, this book explores the identity of the American philosopher. Through informal conversations, the participants discuss the rise of post-analytic philosophy in America and its relations to European thought and to the American pragmatist tradition. They comment on their own intellectual development as well as each others'' work, charting the course of American philosophy over the past few decades. Giovanna Borradori, in her substantial introduction, explains the history of the analytic movement in America and the home-grown reaction against it. In the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, American philosophy was a socially engaged interdisciplinary enterprise. In transcendentalism and pragmatism, then the dominant currents in American thought, philosophy was connected to history, psychology, and public issues. But in the 1930s, the imported European movement of logical positivism redefined philosophical discourse in terms of mathematical logic and theory of language. Under the influence of this analytic view, American philosophy became a professionalized discipline, divorced from public debate and intellectual history and antagonistic to the other, more humanistic tradition of continental thought. The American Philosopher explores the opposition between analytic and continental thought and shows how recent American work has begun to bridge the gap between the two traditions. Through a reexamination of pragmatism, and through an attempt to understand philosophy in a more hermeneutical way, the participants narrow the distance between America''s distinctly scientific philosophy and Europe''s more literary approach. Moving beyond classical analytic philosophy, the participants confront each other on a number of topics. The logico-linguistic orientations of Quine and Davidson come up against the more discursive, interdisciplinary agendas of Rorty, Putnam, and Cavell. Nozick''s theory of pluralist anarchism goes face-to-face with the aesthetic neo-foundationalism of Danto. And Kuhn''s hypothesis of paradigm shifts is measured against MacIntyre''s ethics of "virtues." Borradori''s conversations offer an unconventional portrait of the way philosophers think about their work; scholars and students will not be its only beneficiaries, so will everyone who wonders about the current state of American philosophy.

The idea for Philosophy in a Time of Terror was born hours after the attacks on 9/11 and was realized just weeks later when Giovanna Borradori sat down with Jürgen Habermas and Jacques Derrida in New York City, in separate interviews, to evaluate the significance of the most destructive terrorist act ever perpetrated. This book marks an unprecedented encounter between two of the most influential thinkers of our age as here, for the first time, Habermas and Derrida overcome their mutual antagonism and agree to appear side by side. As the two philosophers disassemble and reassemble what we think we know about terrorism, they break from the familiar social and political rhetoric increasingly polarized between good and evil. In this process, we watch two of the greatest intellects of the century at work.

Examining mainstream media on COVID-19 across China, Italy, the United Kingdom, and the United States, and by drawing from various critical theoretical traditions, this book seeks answers to key questions about the experience of living and dying under COVID-19.The COVID-19 pandemic has been conceived, narrated, and visualized as a numerical crisis and a statistical exception - from the proliferation of dashboards to the numbers of infections cited in news cycles, and the data literacy required to navigate the viral spread. How did these dashboards, along with other numerical images and narratives, condition the lived experience during COVID-19? Is that experience still shaping how we perceive and communicate about the world today? In this book, the authors explore pandemic power - a form of power that declares the beginning and end of the pandemic as a statistically calculable exception, and that works in tandem with a Dashboard worldview. It also argues that pandemic power has normalized a geospatial and biostatistical gaze, the military and political legacies of which constructed the pandemic as we have come to know it, and continued to invigorate its persisting afterlives.This book will benefit students, teachers, and scholars interested in media and critical studies of COVID-19, as well as anyone interested in the political theorization of the changing forms of power during and after the pandemic.

Examining mainstream media on COVID-19 across China, Italy, the United Kingdom, and the United States, and by drawing from various critical theoretical traditions, this book seeks answers to key questions about the experience of living and dying under COVID-19.The COVID-19 pandemic has been conceived, narrated, and visualized as a numerical crisis and a statistical exception - from the proliferation of dashboards to the numbers of infections cited in news cycles, and the data literacy required to navigate the viral spread. How did these dashboards, along with other numerical images and narratives, condition the lived experience during COVID-19? Is that experience still shaping how we perceive and communicate about the world today? In this book, the authors explore pandemic power - a form of power that declares the beginning and end of the pandemic as a statistically calculable exception, and that works in tandem with a Dashboard worldview. It also argues that pandemic power has normalized a geospatial and biostatistical gaze, the military and political legacies of which constructed the pandemic as we have come to know it, and continued to invigorate its persisting afterlives.This book will benefit students, teachers, and scholars interested in media and critical studies of COVID-19, as well as anyone interested in the political theorization of the changing forms of power during and after the pandemic.