John Quigley – författare
3 441 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
2 043 kr
Skickas inom 10-15 vardagar
630 kr
Skickas inom 10-15 vardagar
338 kr
Skickas inom 7-10 vardagar
854 kr
Skickas inom 7-10 vardagar
1 260 kr
Skickas inom 7-10 vardagar
171 kr
Skickas inom 3-6 vardagar
192 kr
Skickas inom 3-6 vardagar
2 272 kr
Skickas inom 10-15 vardagar
1 058 kr
Skickas inom 10-15 vardagar
301 kr
Skickas inom 3-6 vardagar
188 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
251 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
771 kr
Skickas inom 7-10 vardagar
1 357 kr
Skickas inom 7-10 vardagar
508 kr
Skickas inom 7-10 vardagar
258 kr
Skickas inom 7-10 vardagar
1 260 kr
Skickas inom 7-10 vardagar
401 kr
Skickas inom 7-10 vardagar
791 kr
Skickas inom 10-15 vardagar
429 kr
Skickas inom 7-10 vardagar
1 308 kr
Skickas inom 7-10 vardagar
1 273 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
3 328 kr
Skickas inom 10-15 vardagar
3 231 kr
Skickas inom 10-15 vardagar
453 kr
Tillfälligt slut
Analysis of Britain’s role in Palestine has proceeded on the assumption that Britain was lawfully in control of the territory. Analysts differ on whether what it did was proper, but they agree that Britain had a lawful mandate and that through the League of Nations, and that the international community advocated for Jewish territorial rights in Palestine. This analysis, though widely shared, is incorrect. Britain had no territorial rights itself to govern Palestine. It was there by dint of force of arms. The mandate it had over Palestine was initiated unilaterally. The mandate was not given to Britain by the League of Nations. The League of Nations had no authority over Palestine and, in particular, nothing it could give to Britain. The document that Britain composed for the governance of Palestine was never approved by the League of Nations. When, in 1947, Britain had to explain the United Nations its legal status in Palestine, it resorted to distorting the historical facts, in an effort to make it appear it had been in Palestine lawfully.
453 kr
Tillfälligt slut
Analysis of Britain’s role in Palestine has proceeded on the assumption that Britain was lawfully in control of the territory. Analysts differ on whether what it did was proper, but they agree that Britain had a lawful mandate and that through the League of Nations, and that the international community advocated for Jewish territorial rights in Palestine. This analysis, though widely shared, is incorrect. Britain had no territorial rights itself to govern Palestine. It was there by dint of force of arms. The mandate it had over Palestine was initiated unilaterally. The mandate was not given to Britain by the League of Nations. The League of Nations had no authority over Palestine and, in particular, nothing it could give to Britain. The document that Britain composed for the governance of Palestine was never approved by the League of Nations. When, in 1947, Britain had to explain the United Nations its legal status in Palestine, it resorted to distorting the historical facts, in an effort to make it appear it had been in Palestine lawfully.
104 kr
Tillfälligt slut