John Quigley – författare
3 441 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
2 012 kr
Skickas inom 10-15 vardagar
621 kr
Skickas inom 10-15 vardagar
341 kr
Skickas inom 7-10 vardagar
862 kr
Skickas inom 7-10 vardagar
1 271 kr
Skickas inom 7-10 vardagar
171 kr
Skickas inom 3-6 vardagar
192 kr
Skickas inom 3-6 vardagar
2 252 kr
Skickas inom 10-15 vardagar
1 043 kr
Skickas inom 10-15 vardagar
302 kr
Skickas inom 3-6 vardagar
190 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
254 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
The Six-Day War and Israeli Self-Defense
Questioning the Legal Basis for Preventive War
777 kr
Skickas inom 7-10 vardagar
The International Diplomacy of Israel's Founders
Deception at the United Nations in the Quest for Palestine
1 369 kr
Skickas inom 7-10 vardagar
513 kr
Skickas inom 7-10 vardagar
The Six-Day War and Israeli Self-Defense
Questioning the Legal Basis for Preventive War
260 kr
Skickas inom 7-10 vardagar
1 271 kr
Skickas inom 7-10 vardagar
404 kr
Skickas inom 7-10 vardagar
779 kr
Skickas inom 10-15 vardagar
The International Diplomacy of Israel's Founders
Deception at the United Nations in the Quest for Palestine
433 kr
Skickas inom 7-10 vardagar
1 319 kr
Skickas inom 7-10 vardagar
1 284 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
Britain and Its Mandate over Palestine : Legal Chicanery on a World Stage
Legal Chicanery on a World Stage
456 kr
Tillfälligt slut
Analysis of Britain’s role in Palestine has proceeded on the assumption that Britain was lawfully in control of the territory. Analysts differ on whether what it did was proper, but they agree that Britain had a lawful mandate and that through the League of Nations, and that the international community advocated for Jewish territorial rights in Palestine. This analysis, though widely shared, is incorrect. Britain had no territorial rights itself to govern Palestine. It was there by dint of force of arms. The mandate it had over Palestine was initiated unilaterally. The mandate was not given to Britain by the League of Nations. The League of Nations had no authority over Palestine and, in particular, nothing it could give to Britain. The document that Britain composed for the governance of Palestine was never approved by the League of Nations. When, in 1947, Britain had to explain the United Nations its legal status in Palestine, it resorted to distorting the historical facts, in an effort to make it appear it had been in Palestine lawfully.
Britain and Its Mandate over Palestine : Legal Chicanery on a World Stage
Legal Chicanery on a World Stage
444 kr
Tillfälligt slut
Analysis of Britain’s role in Palestine has proceeded on the assumption that Britain was lawfully in control of the territory. Analysts differ on whether what it did was proper, but they agree that Britain had a lawful mandate and that through the League of Nations, and that the international community advocated for Jewish territorial rights in Palestine. This analysis, though widely shared, is incorrect. Britain had no territorial rights itself to govern Palestine. It was there by dint of force of arms. The mandate it had over Palestine was initiated unilaterally. The mandate was not given to Britain by the League of Nations. The League of Nations had no authority over Palestine and, in particular, nothing it could give to Britain. The document that Britain composed for the governance of Palestine was never approved by the League of Nations. When, in 1947, Britain had to explain the United Nations its legal status in Palestine, it resorted to distorting the historical facts, in an effort to make it appear it had been in Palestine lawfully.
104 kr
Tillfälligt slut
3 279 kr
Skickas inom 10-15 vardagar
3 184 kr
Skickas inom 10-15 vardagar