Lloyd E. Ohlin – författare

These ground-breaking works led the way to an authoritative understanding of how social interaction moulded young people. Careful observation of vulnerable and troubled children helped the leading sociologists, whose works are included here, to investigate how aggression, discipline, the struggle for recognition and the need to rebel shaped the personalities of the young. These are important texts for practitioners, students and teachers in health and social welfare.

An exploration of how discretion shapes every stage of criminal justice, revealing the enduring tension between individualized judgment and system-wide fairness.What really happens when the law is applied—not in statutes or theory, but in the day-to-day decisions that shape liberty, punishment, and public safety?Discretion in Criminal Justice brings together leading scholars from the American Bar Foundation's pioneering Survey of Criminal Justice to examine one of the system's most enduring and difficult questions: when should discretion guide justice, and when must it be constrained in the name of fairness and uniformity?Across policing, prosecution, sentencing, parole, and criminal justice education, these essays illuminate the hidden architecture of decision-making that defines outcomes long before a case ever reaches trial verdict. Drawing on original research, retrospective insight, and decades of scholarly impact, the contributors reveal how discretion operates not as an exception—but as the system's organizing principle.From street-level police judgments to prosecutorial charging decisions, from plea bargaining to sentencing policy, the book traces how discretion can both humanize justice and generate deep inconsistency. It also explores the evolution of criminal justice scholarship and education shaped by the ABF Survey's legacy.Contributors include Herman Goldstein, Walter J. Dickey, Raymond I. Parnas, Wayne R. LaFave, and Donald J. Newman.

In 1982 the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation created a small committee-the Justice Program Study Group (whose membership is listed at the end ofthis preface)-and posed to it what can hardly be regarded as an easy ques­ tion: "What ideas, what concepts, what basic intellectual frameworks are lack­ ing" to understand and to more effectively deal with crime in our society? Those who are acquainted with the work of the members of the Study Group will appreciate how many divergent views were expressed-divergent to the degree that some of us came to the conclusion that we were not a Study Group at all but rather a group being studied, an odd collection of ancient experimental animals serving some dark purpose of the Foundation. Eventually, however, a surprisingly strong concurrence emerged. We found we were impressed by the extent to which in our discussions we placed heavy reliance on the products of two types of research: first, those few longitudinal studies related to juvenile delinquency and crime that had been pursued in this country and, second, a few experimental studies that had sought to measure the consequences of different official interventions in criminal careers. These two research strategies had taught us much about crime and its control. Other strategies-case studies, cross-sectional surveys, participant observations, and similar techniques-had indeed been productive, but it was the longitudinal and experimental designs that firmed up the knowledge that the others helped to discover.