Max Krott – författare

This book addresses historical perspectives and contemporary challenges of the politics of forestland governance and the related sustainability crisis in Africa.It focusses on the power dynamics between key actors involved in the governance of forest-related resources either for their exploitation or with regards to biodiversity conservation policies promoted at international arenas. The book provides conceptual and empirical contributions on what happens when global sustainability agendas and the related policy instruments meet the realities of domestic politics in Africa.It reveals that several actors in forest-rich countries, especially those with limited sovereignty, have often employed complex informal strategies as the ‘weapon of the weak’ to resist the domination of the most powerful actors of global environmental politics.The Open Access version of this book, available at www.taylorfrancis.com, has been made available under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 license.

This book addresses historical perspectives and contemporary challenges of the politics of forestland governance and the related sustainability crisis in Africa.It focusses on the power dynamics between key actors involved in the governance of forest-related resources either for their exploitation or with regards to biodiversity conservation policies promoted at international arenas. The book provides conceptual and empirical contributions on what happens when global sustainability agendas and the related policy instruments meet the realities of domestic politics in Africa.It reveals that several actors in forest-rich countries, especially those with limited sovereignty, have often employed complex informal strategies as the ‘weapon of the weak’ to resist the domination of the most powerful actors of global environmental politics.The Open Access version of this book, available at www.taylorfrancis.com, has been made available under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 license.

Although forest policy is an established course in most European university forestry curricula, apart from a special predilection of the teacher, its content varies from country to country according to the position of the forest sector in the domestic economy and society. In some countries, forestry is the backbone of a strong wood-processing industry, in others, recreational uses and amenity values of forests dominate. Despite these differences, all countries have in common the fact that the diversity of interests in forests has increased. Although timber production will not lose its importance in the future, as timber is a renewable resource, the demand for non-wood products and services has increased considerably. This is best reflected by the new notion of sustainable forest management which strives at the reconciliation of economic, ecological, social, cultural and spiritual interests in forests. In addition, the diversity of stakeholders has increased. Forestry is no longer solely the topic of forest associations and forest administration, but also of a multitude of governmental and non-governmental organisations dealing with activities which either affect forest management or are affected by it. Finally, the relationships of the various stakeholders, with diverse interests and varying empowerment, have become more complex, because in some issues the relationships are compatible, and in others, not. Bargaining on forest issues no longer takes place on a national level alone, but also on European and international levels, because many forest policy issues are transboundary.

Although forest policy is an established course in most European university forestry curricula, apart from a special predilection of the teacher, its content varies from country to country according to the position of the forest sector in the domestic economy and society. In some countries, forestry is the backbone of a strong wood-processing industry, in others, recreational uses and amenity values of forests dominate. Despite these differences, all countries have in common the fact that the diversity of interests in forests has increased. Although timber production will not lose its importance in the future, as timber is a renewable resource, the demand for non-wood products and services has increased considerably. This is best reflected by the new notion of sustainable forest management which strives at the reconciliation of economic, ecological, social, cultural and spiritual interests in forests. In addition, the diversity of stakeholders has increased. Forestry is no longer solely the topic of forest associations and forest administration, but also of a multitude of governmental and non-governmental organisations dealing with activities which either affect forest management or are affected by it. Finally, the relationships of the various stakeholders, with diverse interests and varying empowerment, have become more complex, because in some issues the relationships are compatible, and in others, not. Bargaining on forest issues no longer takes place on a national level alone, but also on European and international levels, because many forest policy issues are transboundary.

Researchers in the environmental sciences are often frustrated because actors involved with practice do not follow their advice. This is the starting point of this book, which describes a new model for scientific knowledge transfer called RIU, for Research, Integration and Utilization. This model sees the factors needed for knowledge transfer as being state-of-the-art research and the effective, practical utilization to which it leads, and it highlights the importance of “integration”, which in this context means the active bi‐directional selection of those research results that are relevant for practice. In addition, the model underscores the importance of special allies who are powerful actors that support the application of scientific research results in society. An important product of this approach is a checklist of factors for successful knowledge transfer that will be useful for scientists. By using this checklist, research projects and research programs can be optimised with regard to their potential for reaching successful knowledge transfer effects.

Researchers in the environmental sciences are often frustrated because actors involved with practice do not follow their advice. This is the starting point of this book, which describes a new model for scientific knowledge transfer called RIU, for Research, Integration and Utilization. This model sees the factors needed for knowledge transfer as being state-of-the-art research and the effective, practical utilization to which it leads, and it highlights the importance of “integration”, which in this context means the active bi‐directional selection of those research results that are relevant for practice. In addition, the model underscores the importance of special allies who are powerful actors that support the application of scientific research results in society. An important product of this approach is a checklist of factors for successful knowledge transfer that will be useful for scientists. By using this checklist, research projects and research programs can be optimised with regard to their potential for reaching successful knowledge transfer effects.

Researchers in the environmental sciences are often frustrated because actors involved with practice do not follow their advice. This is the starting point of this book, which describes a new model for scientific knowledge transfer called RIU, for Research, Integration and Utilization. This model sees the factors needed for knowledge transfer as being state-of-the-art research and the effective, practical utilization to which it leads, and it highlights the importance of “integration”, which in this context means the active bi‐directional selection of those research results that are relevant for practice. In addition, the model underscores the importance of special allies who are powerful actors that support the application of scientific research results in society. An important product of this approach is a checklist of factors for successful knowledge transfer that will be useful for scientists. By using this checklist, research projects and research programs can be optimised with regard to their potential for reaching successful knowledge transfer effects.

Theo Augustin Liebe Leserinnen, liebe Leser, mit dem Wettbewerb „REGIONEN AKTIV – Land gestaltet Zukunft“ erprobte das Bundesministerium für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Verbraucherschutz (BMELV) einen neuen Förderansatz mit dem Ziel, die Erfahrungen und Fäh- keiten der Menschen in den ländlichen Regionen zu aktivieren. So können sie ihre Region, auf der Basis ihrer speziellen regionalen Stärken, selbst voranbr- gen statt als passive Fördermittelempfänger dauerhaft auf Hilfe von außen an- wiesen zu sein. In den teilnehmenden Modellregionen sollte ein Prozess in Gang gesetzt werden, der sich in Zukunft selbst trägt und somit zum Vorbild für den gesamten ländlichen Raum und seine Verbindungen zur Stadt wird. Die Zeit ist reif dafür, diesen Ansatz stärker in die Politik für ländliche Räume in Deutschland einzubringen. So kommt z. B. auch die Organisation für wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung (OECD) in ihrem aktuellen Bericht „Das neue Paradigma für den ländlichen Raum“ zu dem Schluss, dass die Landwirtschaft in den meisten Regionen der OECD-Staaten nicht mehr die zentrale Bedeutung für die Entwicklung der ländlichen Räume hat. Man kann also durch die Förderung der Landwirtschaft allein, so sinnvoll sie aus anderen Gründen auch sein mag, die ländlichen Räume nicht voranbringen. Dazu bedarf es stattdessen eines sektorübergreifenden und regionalen Ansatzes.

Die Autoren und Autorinnen der Beiträge verorten praktische Erfahrungen aus der wissenschaftlichen Politikberatung in verschiedenen institutionellen Zusammenhängen in der theoretischen Diskussion zur Rolle von Wissenschaft in der Politik. Darüber hinaus zeigen sie Erfolge und Probleme der Beratungspraxis anhand verschiedener Analyseansätze auf.

Theo Augustin Liebe Leserinnen, liebe Leser, mit dem Wettbewerb „REGIONEN AKTIV – Land gestaltet Zukunft“ erprobte das Bundesministerium für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Verbraucherschutz (BMELV) einen neuen Förderansatz mit dem Ziel, die Erfahrungen und Fäh- keiten der Menschen in den ländlichen Regionen zu aktivieren. So können sie ihre Region, auf der Basis ihrer speziellen regionalen Stärken, selbst voranbr- gen statt als passive Fördermittelempfänger dauerhaft auf Hilfe von außen an- wiesen zu sein. In den teilnehmenden Modellregionen sollte ein Prozess in Gang gesetzt werden, der sich in Zukunft selbst trägt und somit zum Vorbild für den gesamten ländlichen Raum und seine Verbindungen zur Stadt wird. Die Zeit ist reif dafür, diesen Ansatz stärker in die Politik für ländliche Räume in Deutschland einzubringen. So kommt z. B. auch die Organisation für wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung (OECD) in ihrem aktuellen Bericht „Das neue Paradigma für den ländlichen Raum“ zu dem Schluss, dass die Landwirtschaft in den meisten Regionen der OECD-Staaten nicht mehr die zentrale Bedeutung für die Entwicklung der ländlichen Räume hat. Man kann also durch die Förderung der Landwirtschaft allein, so sinnvoll sie aus anderen Gründen auch sein mag, die ländlichen Räume nicht voranbringen. Dazu bedarf es stattdessen eines sektorübergreifenden und regionalen Ansatzes.