Brian Z. Tamanaha – författare
19 kr
Skickas inom 7-10 vardagar
1 376 kr
Skickas inom 7-10 vardagar
649 kr
Skickas inom 3-6 vardagar
328 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
328 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
326 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
1 421 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
791 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
1 706 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
655 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
2 234 kr
Skickas inom 10-15 vardagar
615 kr
Skickas inom 10-15 vardagar
509 kr
Skickas inom 7-10 vardagar
551 kr
Skickas inom 7-10 vardagar
1 318 kr
Skickas inom 7-10 vardagar
1 355 kr
Skickas inom 7-10 vardagar
342 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
727 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
Through an in-depth legal analysis by leading scholars, this book searches for the exact legal causes of land-related disputes in Asia within the histories, legal systems and social realities of the respective countries. It consists of four main parts: examining the relationship between law and development; land-taking in developmental stages; common ownership; and proposals for new approaches to land law and dispute resolution. With a combination of orthodox legal interpretations and the empirical approach of legal sociology, the contributors undertake an extensive comparative legal analysis across common and civil law traditions. Most importantly, they propose pathways forward for legal transformations in the pursuit of sustainable development in Asia.
This book is vital contribution to the study of comparative law, and especially property law, in East and Southeast Asia.
727 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
Through an in-depth legal analysis by leading scholars, this book searches for the exact legal causes of land-related disputes in Asia within the histories, legal systems and social realities of the respective countries. It consists of four main parts: examining the relationship between law and development; land-taking in developmental stages; common ownership; and proposals for new approaches to land law and dispute resolution. With a combination of orthodox legal interpretations and the empirical approach of legal sociology, the contributors undertake an extensive comparative legal analysis across common and civil law traditions. Most importantly, they propose pathways forward for legal transformations in the pursuit of sustainable development in Asia.
This book is vital contribution to the study of comparative law, and especially property law, in East and Southeast Asia.
239 kr
Skickas inom 7-10 vardagar
285 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
285 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
811 kr
Skickas inom 7-10 vardagar
1 417 kr
Skickas inom 7-10 vardagar
427 kr
Skickas inom 7-10 vardagar
409 kr
Skickas inom 7-10 vardagar
495 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
478 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
446 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
According to conventional wisdom in American legal culture, the 1870s to 1920s was the age of legal formalism, when judges believed that the law was autonomous and logically ordered, and that they mechanically deduced right answers in cases. In the 1920s and 1930s, the story continues, the legal realists discredited this view by demonstrating that the law is marked by gaps and contradictions, arguing that judges construct legal justifications to support desired outcomes. This often-repeated historical account is virtually taken for granted today, and continues to shape understandings about judging. In this groundbreaking book, esteemed legal theorist Brian Tamanaha thoroughly debunks the formalist-realist divide. Drawing from extensive research into the writings of judges and scholars, Tamanaha shows how, over the past century and a half, jurists have regularly expressed a balanced view of judging that acknowledges the limitations of law and of judges, yet recognizes that judges can and do render rule-bound decisions. He reveals how the story about the formalist age was an invention of politically motivated critics of the courts, and how it has led to significant misunderstandings about legal realism. Beyond the Formalist-Realist Divide traces how this false tale has distorted studies of judging by political scientists and debates among legal theorists. Recovering a balanced realism about judging, this book fundamentally rewrites legal history and offers a fresh perspective for theorists, judges, and practitioners of law.