Sarah Richmond – författare

Since the 1980s, MRI scanners have told us much about brain function and played an important role in the clinical diagnosis of a number of conditions - both in the brain and the rest of the body. Their routine use has made the diagnosis of brain tumours and brain damage both quicker and more accurate. However, some neuroscientific advances, in particular those that relate specifically to the mind have provoked excitement and discussion in a number of disciplines.One of the most thought provoking developments in recent neuroscience has been the progress made with ''mind-reading''. There seems nothing more private than one''s thoughts, some of which we might choose to share with others, and some not. Yet, until now, little has been published on the particular issueof privacy in relation to ''brain'' or ''mind'' reading.I know what you''re thinking provides a fascinating, interdisciplinary account of the neuroscientific evidence on ''mind reading'', as well as a thorough analysis of both legal and moral accounts of privacy. It brings together leading academics from the fields of psychology, neuroscience, philosophy, and law. The book considers such issues as the use of imaging to detect awareness in those considered to be in a vegetative state. It looks at issues of mental imaging and national security,the neurobiology of violence, and issues regarding diminished responsibility in criminals, and thus reduced punishment. It also considers how the use of neuroimaging can and should be regulated.Providing a ground breaking exploration of how brain imaging technologies can throw light on our mental capacities, states, and acts, this is an important new book for psychologists, neuroscientists, bioethicists, philosophers, and lawyers.

Since the 1980s, MRI scanners have told us much about brain function and played an important role in the clinical diagnosis of a number of conditions - both in the brain and the rest of the body. Their routine use has made the diagnosis of brain tumours and brain damage both quicker and more accurate. However, some neuroscientific advances, in particular those that relate specifically to the mind have provoked excitement and discussion in a number of disciplines.One of the most thought provoking developments in recent neuroscience has been the progress made with ''mind-reading''. There seems nothing more private than one''s thoughts, some of which we might choose to share with others, and some not. Yet, until now, little has been published on the particular issueof privacy in relation to ''brain'' or ''mind'' reading.I know what you''re thinking provides a fascinating, interdisciplinary account of the neuroscientific evidence on ''mind reading'', as well as a thorough analysis of both legal and moral accounts of privacy. It brings together leading academics from the fields of psychology, neuroscience, philosophy, and law. The book considers such issues as the use of imaging to detect awareness in those considered to be in a vegetative state. It looks at issues of mental imaging and national security,the neurobiology of violence, and issues regarding diminished responsibility in criminals, and thus reduced punishment. It also considers how the use of neuroimaging can and should be regulated.Providing a ground breaking exploration of how brain imaging technologies can throw light on our mental capacities, states, and acts, this is an important new book for psychologists, neuroscientists, bioethicists, philosophers, and lawyers.

Since the 1980s, MRI scanners have told us much about brain function and played an important role in the clinical diagnosis of a number of conditions - both in the brain and the rest of the body. Their routine use has made the diagnosis of brain tumours and brain damage both quicker and more accurate. However, some neuroscientific advances, in particular those that relate specifically to the mind have provoked excitement and discussion in a number of disciplines. One of the most thought provoking developments in recent neuroscience has been the progress made with 'mind-reading'. There seems nothing more private than one's thoughts, some of which we might choose to share with others, and some not. Yet, until now, little has been published on the particular issue of privacy in relation to 'brain' or 'mind' reading. I know what you're thinking provides a fascinating, interdisciplinary account of the neuroscientific evidence on 'mind reading', as well as a thorough analysis of both legal and moral accounts of privacy. It brings together leading academics from the fields of psychology, neuroscience, philosophy, and law. The book considers such issues as the use of imaging to detect awareness in those considered to be in a vegetative state. It looks at issues of mental imaging and national security, the neurobiology of violence, and issues regarding diminished responsibility in criminals, and thus reduced punishment. It also considers how the use of neuroimaging can and should be regulated. Providing a ground breaking exploration of how brain imaging technologies can throw light on our mental capacities, states, and acts, this is an important new book for psychologists, neuroscientists, bioethicists, philosophers, and lawyers.

Bold as brass, London milliner Dolly Wycliffe storms the hallowed halls of a private men's club seeking the counsel of up-and-coming barrister, Edmund Caruthers. She means to sue an English lord for the wrongful death of her father.Unfortunately, Edmund can't help her. The coroner has ruled the death an accident and won't reopen the case without new evidence. Still, he finds Dolly utterly charming. Few questioned authority with such conviction. For a woman to do so was unthinkable.Tenacious to a fault, Dolly finds irregularities in the investigation and Edmund changes his mind. He defies his family and social convention to negotiate a tidy sum for Dolly's family— which they will receive as long as they keep the out-of-court settlement a secret.Dolly believes his lordship is head of a criminal conspiracy. Edmund is completely flummoxed as to why she would jeopardize her family's annuity by accusing his lordship of a crime.As their mutual attraction grows stronger, Dolly and Edmund are aware more than her wide-brimmed hats keep them apart.

Edmund Caruthers, London barrister and gentleman, is frustrated his betrothed, the lovely Dolly Wycliffe, won't set a date to marry him.Dolly loves Edmund, but she feels responsible for his dismissal from his law firm and his posh friends' open hostility toward them. Even his father is against the marriage because she's a shop girl. Edmund doesn't know how to convince her that her happiness is more important to him than status or wealth.When a woman is found murdered in fashionable Mayfair, their two worlds collide. The victim is a shop girl and Dolly is determined to find the killer. Their engagement is broken when Edmund keeps a friend's secret from Dolly.Will his devotion to her and the cause of justice be enough to convince Dolly to change her mind and set a date?

Their attraction to each other was undeniable.Tilda Ferguson, a rich American widow on holiday in London, forms an attachment to the son of a distinguished English family only to find the family has fallen on hard times and is after her money.Matthew Broadstreet can save his family from financial ruin if only he will marry her. His feelings for her are upended when he finds out she's neither an American nor a widow. She is, in fact, Tillie Partridge, the family's former scullery maid.Believing she is a thief, Matthew is ready to expose her scheme, which leaves Tillie with no choice but to reveal the reason for her expulsion from England almost a decade earlier: Matthew's father paid her five hundred pounds to keep a secret. She invested wisely in oil wells and with extraordinary luck amassed a fortune.Matthew refuses to believe a member of his family could be involved in anything sordid but his inquiries convince him something happened that must be explained.They work together to unravel the secret, but will the past prove to be too big an obstacle for true happiness?