Shaily Shashikant Patel – författare

Smoke & Mirrors: Discourses of Magic in Early Petrine Traditions explores how magic disappears and miracle emerges in a series of texts featuring the apostle Peter. Considering the contradiction of early Christian authors' approval of seemingly magical practices, such as exorcisms, Shaily Shashikant Patel examines the impact this treatment of magic had in forging key facets of Christianity like Jesus' identity, apostolic authority, community norms, Christian orthodoxy. Patel's analysis details how Christian texts featuring Peter respond to broader discourses of Roman magic. Rather than viewing magic as primarily a polemical label applied to one's theological enemies, she relies on newer, more flexible heuristics for ancient magic offered in adjacent fields and in cutting-edge interdisciplinary work. Her argument posits that ancient magic was more than a label; it also included practices that were susceptible to drawing an accusation of magic in the first place. In other words, magic was a vast and contradictory discourse. To understand magic in early Petrine texts, she suggests we must consider both the label of "magic" when it is applied to theological enemies as well as authors' narration of practices commonly stereotyped as "magic" in the Roman imagination. Smoke & Mirrors ultimately answers why early Christian authors could write approvingly of practices like exorcism or healing while simultaneously maligning magic. Petrine authors knowingly distance their own orthodoxies from magic in multiple ways, including appeals to eschatology, Christology, apostolic authority, community norms, and notions of heresy. Meanwhile, these same authors also leverage the popular allure of magic by reframing activities associated with magic in wider Graeco-Roman literature. Cycles of discursive formation like these help forge a distinctively Christian category of wonderworking, “signs and wonders,” or “miracle,” in the modern vernacular.

Smoke & Mirrors: Discourses of Magic in Early Petrine Traditions explores how magic disappears and miracle emerges in a series of texts featuring the apostle Peter. Considering the contradiction of early Christian authors' approval of seemingly magical practices, such as exorcisms, Shaily Shashikant Patel examines the impact this treatment of magic had in forging key facets of Christianity like Jesus' identity, apostolic authority, community norms, Christian orthodoxy. Patel's analysis details how Christian texts featuring Peter respond to broader discourses of Roman magic. Rather than viewing magic as primarily a polemical label applied to one's theological enemies, she relies on newer, more flexible heuristics for ancient magic offered in adjacent fields and in cutting-edge interdisciplinary work. Her argument posits that ancient magic was more than a label; it also included practices that were susceptible to drawing an accusation of magic in the first place. In other words, magic was a vast and contradictory discourse. To understand magic in early Petrine texts, she suggests we must consider both the label of "e;magic"e; when it is applied to theological enemies as well as authors' narration of practices commonly stereotyped as "e;magic"e; in the Roman imagination. Smoke & Mirrors ultimately answers why early Christian authors could write approvingly of practices like exorcism or healing while simultaneously maligning magic. Petrine authors knowingly distance their own orthodoxies from magic in multiple ways, including appeals to eschatology, Christology, apostolic authority, community norms, and notions of heresy. Meanwhile, these same authors also leverage the popular allure of magic by reframing activities associated with magic in wider Graeco-Roman literature. Cycles of discursive formation like these help forge a distinctively Christian category of wonderworking, signs and wonders, or miracle, in the modern vernacular.

Smoke & Mirrors: Discourses of Magic in Early Petrine Traditions explores how magic disappears and miracle emerges in a series of texts featuring the apostle Peter. Considering the contradiction of early Christian authors' approval of seemingly magical practices, such as exorcisms, Shaily Shashikant Patel examines the impact this treatment of magic had in forging key facets of Christianity like Jesus' identity, apostolic authority, community norms, Christian orthodoxy. Patel's analysis details how Christian texts featuring Peter respond to broader discourses of Roman magic. Rather than viewing magic as primarily a polemical label applied to one's theological enemies, she relies on newer, more flexible heuristics for ancient magic offered in adjacent fields and in cutting-edge interdisciplinary work. Her argument posits that ancient magic was more than a label; it also included practices that were susceptible to drawing an accusation of magic in the first place. In other words, magic was a vast and contradictory discourse. To understand magic in early Petrine texts, she suggests we must consider both the label of "e;magic"e; when it is applied to theological enemies as well as authors' narration of practices commonly stereotyped as "e;magic"e; in the Roman imagination. Smoke & Mirrors ultimately answers why early Christian authors could write approvingly of practices like exorcism or healing while simultaneously maligning magic. Petrine authors knowingly distance their own orthodoxies from magic in multiple ways, including appeals to eschatology, Christology, apostolic authority, community norms, and notions of heresy. Meanwhile, these same authors also leverage the popular allure of magic by reframing activities associated with magic in wider Graeco-Roman literature. Cycles of discursive formation like these help forge a distinctively Christian category of wonderworking, signs and wonders, or miracle, in the modern vernacular.

Magic and Heresy in Ancient Christian Literature is a genealogical study of two parallel but not coequal discursive trajectories: of 'magic' and of 'heresy.' This longue durée analysis charts how these two discursive streams intersect in myriad ways, for myriad ends, across the first four centuries of selected Christian literature. Magic and Heresy attempts to answer in part the question: When and how did early Christian authors start thinking of magic as heresy - that is, as a religious and epistemic system wholly external to their own orthodoxies? Prompted by metacritical concerns about the relationship between magic and heresy, as well as these categories' roles in erecting and maintaining Christian empire, this Element seeks to disrupt tidy conceptual conflations of magic-heresy constructed by ancient authors and replicated in some modern scholarship. Magic and Heresy excavates the cycles of discursive disciplining that eventually resulted in these very conflations.