Slavko Splichal – författare
2 138 kr
Skickas inom 10-15 vardagar
626 kr
Skickas inom 10-15 vardagar
584 kr
Skickas inom 10-15 vardagar
1 496 kr
Skickas
755 kr
Skickas inom 10-15 vardagar
1 027 kr
Skickas inom 10-15 vardagar
847 kr
Skickas inom 10-15 vardagar
483 kr
Skickas inom 10-15 vardagar
578 kr
Skickas inom 10-15 vardagar
2 148 kr
Skickas inom 10-15 vardagar
362 kr
Skickas inom 10-15 vardagar
707 kr
Skickas inom 10-15 vardagar
316 kr
Skickas inom 10-15 vardagar
1 236 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
1 152 kr
Skickas
368 kr
Skickas
381 kr
Tillfälligt slut
439 kr
Tillfälligt slut
The book, anchored in stimulating debates about the Enlightenment ideas of publicness, analyses historical changes in the core phenomena of publicness: possibilities, conditions and obstacles to developing a public sphere in which the public reflexively creates, articulates and expresses public opinion. It is focused on the historical transformation from “public use of reason” through the identification of “public opinion” in opinion polls to contemporary opinion mining, in which the Enlightenment idea of public expression of opinion has been displaced by the technology of extracting opinions. It heralds a new critical impetus in theory and research of publicness at a time when critical social thought is sharply criticising and even abandoning the notion of the public sphere, much like the notion of public opinion decades ago, due to its predominantly administrative use.
439 kr
Tillfälligt slut
The book, anchored in stimulating debates about the Enlightenment ideas of publicness, analyses historical changes in the core phenomena of publicness: possibilities, conditions and obstacles to developing a public sphere in which the public reflexively creates, articulates and expresses public opinion. It is focused on the historical transformation from “public use of reason” through the identification of “public opinion” in opinion polls to contemporary opinion mining, in which the Enlightenment idea of public expression of opinion has been displaced by the technology of extracting opinions. It heralds a new critical impetus in theory and research of publicness at a time when critical social thought is sharply criticising and even abandoning the notion of the public sphere, much like the notion of public opinion decades ago, due to its predominantly administrative use.