Todd A. Henry – författare

Assimilating Seoul, the first book-length study written in English about Seoul during the colonial period, challenges conventional nationalist paradigms by revealing the intersection of Korean and Japanese history in this important capital. Through microhistories of Shinto festivals, industrial expositions, and sanitation campaigns, Todd A. Henry offers a transnational account that treats the city's public spaces as "contact zones," showing how residents negotiated pressures to become loyal, industrious, and hygienic subjects of the Japanese empire. Unlike previous, top-down analyses, this ethnographic history investigates modalities of Japanese rule as experienced from below. Although the colonial state set ambitious goals for the integration of Koreans, Japanese settler elites and lower-class expatriates shaped the speed and direction of assimilation by bending government initiatives to their own interests and identities. Meanwhile, Korean men and women of different classes and generations rearticulated the terms and degree of their incorporation into a multiethnic polity.Assimilating Seoul captures these fascinating responses to an empire that used the lure of empowerment to disguise the reality of alienation.

Assimilating Seoul, the first book-length study written in English about Seoul during the colonial period, challenges conventional nationalist paradigms by revealing the intersection of Korean and Japanese history in this important capital. Through microhistories of Shinto festivals, industrial expositions, and sanitation campaigns, Todd A. Henry offers a transnational account that treats the city's public spaces as "contact zones," showing how residents negotiated pressures to become loyal, industrious, and hygienic subjects of the Japanese empire. Unlike previous, top-down analyses, this ethnographic history investigates modalities of Japanese rule as experienced from below. Although the colonial state set ambitious goals for the integration of Koreans, Japanese settler elites and lower-class expatriates shaped the speed and direction of assimilation by bending government initiatives to their own interests and identities. Meanwhile, Korean men and women of different classes and generations rearticulated the terms and degree of their incorporation into a multiethnic polity.Assimilating Seoul captures these fascinating responses to an empire that used the lure of empowerment to disguise the reality of alienation.

Assimilating Seoul, the first book-length study written in English about Seoul during the colonial period, challenges conventional nationalist paradigms by revealing the intersection of Korean and Japanese history in this important capital. Through microhistories of Shinto festivals, industrial expositions, and sanitation campaigns, Todd A. Henry offers a transnational account that treats the city’s public spaces as "contact zones," showing how residents negotiated pressures to become loyal, industrious, and hygienic subjects of the Japanese empire. Unlike previous, top-down analyses, this ethnographic history investigates modalities of Japanese rule as experienced from below. Although the colonial state set ambitious goals for the integration of Koreans, Japanese settler elites and lower-class expatriates shaped the speed and direction of assimilation by bending government initiatives to their own interests and identities. Meanwhile, Korean men and women of different classes and generations rearticulated the terms and degree of their incorporation into a multiethnic polity. Assimilating Seoul captures these fascinating responses to an empire that used the lure of empowerment to disguise the reality of alienation.

Since the end of the nineteenth century, the Korean people have faced successive waves of foreign domination, authoritarian regimes, forced dispersal, and divided development. Throughout these turbulent times, “queer” Koreans were ignored, minimized, and erased in narratives of their modern nation, East Asia, and the wider world. This interdisciplinary volume challenges such marginalization through critical analyses of non-normative sexuality and gender variance. Considering both personal and collective forces, the contributors extend individualized notions of queer neoliberalism beyond those typically set in Western queer theory. Along the way, they recount a range of illuminating topics, from shamanic rituals during the colonial era and B-grade comedy films under Cold War dictatorship to female masculinity among today’s youth and transgender confrontations with the resident registration system. More broadly, Queer Korea offers readers new ways of understanding the limits and possibilities of human liberation under exclusionary conditions of modernity in Asia and beyond.Contributors. Pei Jean Chen, John (Song Pae) Cho, Chung-kang Kim, Todd A. Henry, Merose Hwang, Ruin, Layoung Shin, Shin-ae Ha, John Whittier Treat

Since the end of the nineteenth century, the Korean people have faced successive waves of foreign domination, authoritarian regimes, forced dispersal, and divided development. Throughout these turbulent times, “queer” Koreans were ignored, minimized, and erased in narratives of their modern nation, East Asia, and the wider world. This interdisciplinary volume challenges such marginalization through critical analyses of non-normative sexuality and gender variance. Considering both personal and collective forces, the contributors extend individualized notions of queer neoliberalism beyond those typically set in Western queer theory. Along the way, they recount a range of illuminating topics, from shamanic rituals during the colonial era and B-grade comedy films under Cold War dictatorship to female masculinity among today’s youth and transgender confrontations with the resident registration system. More broadly, Queer Korea offers readers new ways of understanding the limits and possibilities of human liberation under exclusionary conditions of modernity in Asia and beyond.Contributors. Pei Jean Chen, John (Song Pae) Cho, Chung-kang Kim, Todd A. Henry, Merose Hwang, Ruin, Layoung Shin, Shin-ae Ha, John Whittier Treat

This groundbreaking, interdisciplinary study reassesses South Korea’s tumultuous era of authoritarian development (1950–1980) through previously obscured yet illuminating histories of queerness—defined as gender variance, atypical anatomies, and same-sex sexuality, among other nonnormative expressions. Instead of primarily viewing these histories through minoritarian or liberal lenses, Todd A. Henry adopts universalizing and provincializing approaches to examine how societal conformity to dimorphic expectations of gender, sex, and sexuality was foundational to the operation of militarized capitalism in this postcolonial and still-divided nation, thus revealing how biopolitical assessments of citizenship produced rigid boundaries and hierarchized valuations of human life. As such, he urges researchers of Korean Studies to pursue more fully embodied methodologies, also encouraging practitioners of LGBTI Studies to include "Hot War" and non-Western cultures in their Euro-American-centric theorizing.Drawing on a broad range of understudied sources—including scientific case reports, journalistic exposés, question-and-answer columns, newspaper cartoons, popular films, and oral histories—Profits of Queerness meticulously documents how the commanding but contested intersection of mass media, sexual medicine, and everyday policing reestablished such categorical distinctions as "men" versus "women" and "healthy" versus "deviant," among other binaries. In particular, Henry argues that sensationalizing reporters, pathologizing doctors, surveilling officers, and everyday vigilantes consolidated a "mass dictatorship" characterized by androcentric, heteropatriarchal, and capitalist goals—aims regularly concealed by triumphalist narratives of the country’s "miraculous" recovery from the Korean War (1950–1953) and its industrialized "take-off" under the developmental dictatorship of Park Chung Hee (1961–1979). To highlight the agency of queer and intersex persons silenced in these accounts, he deploys the bottom-up notion of "shadow reading," tracing how marginalized actors transformed pejorative depictions, diagnoses, and rulings into empowering practices on the fringes of an illiberal polity. Ultimately, Henry shows how a contradictory mixture of "queerphobia" and "queerphilia" intersected as a core dynamic of South Korean "hetero-authoritarianism." More broadly, he posits these critical concepts as necessary to both understand and challenge new and ongoing forms of psychosomatic domination (re)emerging across the world today.