Marci Shore – författare

The journey from avant-garde to radical Marxism among the literati of 1920s Poland  “In the elegant capital city of Warsaw, the editor Mieczyslaw Grydzewski would come with his two dachshunds to a café called Ziemianska.” Thus begins the history of a generation of Polish literati born at the fin de siècle. They sat in Café Ziemianska and believed that the world moved on what they said there. Caviar and Ashes tells the story of the young avant-gardists of the early 1920s who became the radical Marxists of the late 1920s. They made the choice for Marxism before Stalinism, before socialist realism, before Marxism meant the imposition of Soviet communism in Poland. It ended tragically.  Marci Shore begins with this generation’s coming of age after the First World War and narrates a half-century-long journey through futurist manifestos and proletarian poetry, Stalinist terror and Nazi genocide, a journey from the literary cafés to the cells of prisons and the corridors of power. Using newly available archival materials from Poland and Russia, as well as from Ukraine and Israel, Shore explores what it meant to live Marxism as a European, an East European, and a Jewish intellectual in the twentieth century.

A vivid and intimate account of the Ukrainian Revolution, the rare moment when the political became the existential  “Shore brilliantly captures the contingency, uncertainty, and chaos that was transmuted into the remarkable, seemingly transcendent solidarity of the Maidan’s unified resistance to a corrupt and cruel régime.”—Charles Taylor, professor emeritus of philosophy, McGill University  What is worth dying for? While the world watched the uprising on the Maidan as an episode in geopolitics, those in Ukraine during the extraordinary winter of 2013–14 lived the revolution as an existential transformation: the blurring of night and day, the loss of a sense of time, the sudden disappearance of fear, the imperative to make choices. The Maidan was an illumination of the human capacity for natality, the ability to act, to begin anew at this moment. It was the turning point without which Ukrainian resistance to the full-scale Russian invasion cannot be understood.  In this lyrical and piercing book, Marci Shore evokes the human face of the Ukrainian revolution. Grounded in interviews with activists and soldiers, parents and children, Shore’s book blends a narrative of suspenseful choices with a historian’s reflections on what revolution is and what it means. She gently sets her portraits of individual revolutionaries against the past as they understand it—and the future as they hope to make it. In so doing, she provides a lesson about human solidarity in a world, our world, where the boundary between reality and fiction is ever more effaced.

A superb account of complex psyche of Eastern Europe in the wake of the revolutions of 1989 and the opening of the communist archives.In the tradition of Timothy Garton Ash’s The File, Yale historian and prize-winning author Marci Shore draws upon intimate understanding to illuminate the afterlife of totalitarianism. The Taste of Ashes spans from Berlin to Moscow, moving from Vienna in Europe’s west through Prague, Bratislava, Warsaw and Bucharest to Vilnius and Kiev in the post-communist east. The result is a shimmering literary examination of the ghost of communism – no longer Marx’s 'spectre to come' but a haunting presence of the past.Marci Shore builds her history around people she came to know over the course of the two decades since communism came to an end in Eastern Europe: her colleagues and friends, once-communists and once-dissidents, the accusers and the accused, the interrogators and the interrogated, Zionists, Bundists, Stalinists and their children and grandchildren. For them, the post-communist moment has not closed but rather has summoned up the past: revolution in 1968, Stalinism, the Second World War, the Holocaust. The end of communism had a dark side. As Shore pulls the reader into her journey of discovery, reading the archival records of people who are themselves confronting the traumas of former lives, she reveals the intertwining of the personal and the political, of love and cruelty, of intimacy and betrayal. The result is a lyrical and sometimes heartbreaking portrayal of how history moves and what history means.

2001 verbrachte die russische Journalistin Anna Politkowskaja im Rahmen eines Milena Jesenská-Fellowships drei Monate am Institut für die Wissenschaften vom Menschen in Wien und arbeitete an ihrem Buch über den zweiten Tschetschenienkrieg (deutsch 2003 erschienen unter dem Titel Tschetschenien. Die Wahrheit über den Krieg). Sie wurde schon damals massiv bedroht. Als wir sie zu einem Treffen der Jesenska-Alumni im September 2006 einluden, antwortete sie nicht. Am 7. Oktober wurde sie in Moskau ermordet.Im Oktober 2007 wurde Leszek Kolakowski achtzig Jahre alt. 1959 an die Universität Warschau berufen, war er Verfechter einer Reform des Kommunismus, bis er 1966 aus der Partei ausgeschlossen wurde, 1968 seinen Lehrstuhl verlor und in den Westen emigrierte. Mit der Idee des Sozialismus hat Kolakowski sich schon früh beschäftigt. In seinem 1957 geschriebenen und von der Zensur unterdrückten ironischen Pamphlet "Was ist Sozialismus?" hält er dem kommunistischen Regime einen Spiegel vor. Fast fünf Jahrzehnte nach diesem – hier wiederabgedruckten – Meisterstück politischer Satire zieht Kolakowski in seinem Essay "Was vom Sozialismus bleibt" noch einmal Bilanz: "Dass sich der Marxismus in so gut wie allem geirrt hat", schreibt Kolakowski, "macht noch lange nicht die sozialistische Tradition obsolet. Und dass die sozialistischen Ideale missbraucht wurden, diskreditiert sie nicht schon. Schließlich haben sich sozialistische Werte mit liberalen verbunden und wurden im Rahmen demokratischer Marktwirtschaft verwirklicht." Sozialismus "als Ausdruck der Solidarität mit den Unterdrückten und sozial Benachteiligten" und als Korrektiv "das uns daran erinnert, dass es etwas jenseits von Konkurrenzkampf und Gier gibt, aus all diesen Gründen ist der Sozialismus – das Ideal, nicht das System – immer noch von Nutzen."