Stephen Spender – författare

Poems Written Abroad is the first publication of the earliest collection of poetry by the famous poet, novelist, literary critic, translator, and radical, Sir Stephen Spender (1909-1995). Spender wrote and compiled this manuscript in 1927, when he was living in Nantes and Lausanne. In tone and diction, Spender's poems range from creatively traditional to unexpectedly innovative. They reflect his reading in Shakespeare and French poetry, as well as his absorption in music and modern art. They also document his struggles with his sexual identity and his emerging desire to devote his life, at whatever cost, to the writing of poetry.This beautiful facsimile edition, authorized by the Spender estate, faithfully reproduces the features of the original manuscript now held by the Lilly Library, including the frontispiece, an ink drawing by Spender himself, and little-known photographs of the poet. The editor's extensive introduction and detailed explanatory notes situate Spender's juvenilia in the context of his life and work and the history of modern poetry. The volume will appeal to readers with interests in modern poetry, gender studies, and fine books.

Shelley said, in his Defence of Poetry, that poetry should be both centre and circumference of knowledge. In his new book, Spender takes Shelley's claim and relates it to modern literature. He points out that, ever since the Industrial Revolution, writers have been conscious of there being a problem of creating literature in the industrial era. All the discussions of tradition, symbolism, myth and the rest are part of a conscious strategy of writers to come to terms with a modern world which they feel presents quite special problems for them. Spender shows how Matthew Arnold's idea that criticism might be more important than poetry in our time, was taken over by poets who wrote criticism, and how in tern they have become superseded by critics who write poetry. The critical intelligence tens to absorb creative energy. He discusses the difference between the creative and critical functions and things that the present tendency of criticism to supersede creativity, and for poetry to become an academic exercise conducted by poets who are dons, is having a stifling effect on poetry. He thinks that there is an increasing tendency for the most creative activity of literature to become shut off from life and fermented, and that literature should be related much more to contemporary history, and less to dogmatic principles of academic criticism. This is a book in which the writer tried to reassert the relationship of literature to modern life. He believes that this relationship was the pre-occupation of writers in the 1920s and 1930, but that since then literature has become increasingly split into the writing of the new academics and that of aggressive anti-intellectuals. He things that contemporary criticism should be on a much wider basis, and take into account the history and the society in which we live, as well as the abstract principles which recent critics have evolved. This title is part of UC Press's Voices Revived program, which commemorates University of California Press's mission to seek out and cultivate the brightest minds and give them voice, reach, and impact. Drawing on a backlist dating to 1893, Voices Revived makes high-quality, peer-reviewed scholarship accessible once again using print-on-demand technology. This title was originally published in 1963.

Shelley said, in his Defence of Poetry, that poetry should be both centre and circumference of knowledge. In his new book, Spender takes Shelley's claim and relates it to modern literature. He points out that, ever since the Industrial Revolution, writers have been conscious of there being a problem of creating literature in the industrial era. All the discussions of tradition, symbolism, myth and the rest are part of a conscious strategy of writers to come to terms with a modern world which they feel presents quite special problems for them. Spender shows how Matthew Arnold's idea that criticism might be more important than poetry in our time, was taken over by poets who wrote criticism, and how in tern they have become superseded by critics who write poetry. The critical intelligence tens to absorb creative energy. He discusses the difference between the creative and critical functions and things that the present tendency of criticism to supersede creativity, and for poetry to become an academic exercise conducted by poets who are dons, is having a stifling effect on poetry. He thinks that there is an increasing tendency for the most creative activity of literature to become shut off from life and fermented, and that literature should be related much more to contemporary history, and less to dogmatic principles of academic criticism. This is a book in which the writer tried to reassert the relationship of literature to modern life. He believes that this relationship was the pre-occupation of writers in the 1920s and 1930, but that since then literature has become increasingly split into the writing of the new academics and that of aggressive anti-intellectuals. He things that contemporary criticism should be on a much wider basis, and take into account the history and the society in which we live, as well as the abstract principles which recent critics have evolved. This title is part of UC Press's Voices Revived program, which commemorates University of California Press's mission to seek out and cultivate the brightest minds and give them voice, reach, and impact. Drawing on a backlist dating to 1893, Voices Revived makes high-quality, peer-reviewed scholarship accessible once again using print-on-demand technology. This title was originally published in 1963.

Shelley said, in his Defence of Poetry, that poetry should be both centre and circumference of knowledge. In his new book, Spender takes Shelley's claim and relates it to modern literature. He points out that, ever since the Industrial Revolution, writers have been conscious of there being a problem of creating literature in the industrial era. All the discussions of tradition, symbolism, myth and the rest are part of a conscious strategy of writers to come to terms with a modern world which they feel presents quite special problems for them. Spender shows how Matthew Arnold's idea that criticism might be more important than poetry in our time, was taken over by poets who wrote criticism, and how in tern they have become superseded by critics who write poetry. The critical intelligence tens to absorb creative energy. He discusses the difference between the creative and critical functions and things that the present tendency of criticism to supersede creativity, and for poetry to become an academic exercise conducted by poets who are dons, is having a stifling effect on poetry. He thinks that there is an increasing tendency for the most creative activity of literature to become shut off from life and fermented, and that literature should be related much more to contemporary history, and less to dogmatic principles of academic criticism. This is a book in which the writer tried to reassert the relationship of literature to modern life. He believes that this relationship was the pre-occupation of writers in the 1920s and 1930, but that since then literature has become increasingly split into the writing of the new academics and that of aggressive anti-intellectuals. He things that contemporary criticism should be on a much wider basis, and take into account the history and the society in which we live, as well as the abstract principles which recent critics have evolved. This title is part of UC Press's Voices Revived program, which commemorates University of California Press's mission to seek out and cultivate the brightest minds and give them voice, reach, and impact. Drawing on a backlist dating to 1893, Voices Revived makes high-quality, peer-reviewed scholarship accessible once again using print-on-demand technology. This title was originally published in 1963.

Stephen Spender, the son of a journalist, was born in London in 1909. He was educated at University College, Oxford, where he met, among others, W. H. Auden, Christopher Isherwood and Louis MacNeice, with whom he was to develop a poetics of engagement, writing powerfully of the confusion and alarm of 1930s Europe. He visited Spain during the Civil War, in 1937, where he assisted the Republican cause with propaganda activity. His post-war memoir World within World was recognised as one of the most illuminating literary autobiographies to have come out of the 1930s and 1940s, distilling a distinctively personal, humanistic socialism. His poetry has been praised for its exploratory candour, its personal approach to the stresses of modernity, and its exact portraiture of social and political upheaval. Grey Gowrie's new selection offers a timely and incisive revaluation of Spender's substantial poetic corpus.

Stephen Spender, along with his friends W. H. Auden, Louis MacNeice and C. Day Lewis, rose to prominence in the 1930s, writing powerfully of the fear and paranoia of a continent heading towards war. By the time of his death in 1995 he had established a distinguished reputation as a poet, critic, editor and translator. This New Collected Poems, edited by Michael Brett, gathers seven decades of verse from Poems (1933) to Dolphins (1994) and the late uncollected work. Reordering the thematic principle of the 1985 Collected Poems, this edition returns to a book-by-book chronology and allows the reader to experience, for the first time, the full development and range of his career.

Stephen Spender, the son of a journalist, was born in London in 1909. He was educated at University College, Oxford, where he met, among others, W. H. Auden, Christopher Isherwood and Louis MacNeice, with whom he was to develop a poetics of engagement, writing powerfully of the confusion and alarm of 1930s Europe. He visited Spain during the Civil War, in 1937, where he assisted the Republican cause with propaganda activity. His post-war memoir World within World was recognised as one of the most illuminating literary autobiographies to have come out of the 1930s and 1940s, distilling a distinctively personal, humanistic socialism. His poetry has been praised for its exploratory candour, its personal approach to the stresses of modernity, and its exact portraiture of social and political upheaval. Grey Gowrie's new selection offers a timely and incisive revaluation of Spender's substantial poetic corpus.

Private faces in public placesAre wiser and nicerThan public faces in private places.W.H. Auden, dedication to Stephen Spender, 1932Stephen Spender wrote almost a million words of journal entries between his September Journal in 1939 and his death in 1995. In choosing from these voluminous journals for the new edition, the editors have tried to provide a picture of the various lives Spender brought together in autobiographical form.The earlier 1985 edition of the Journals was overseen by the author, and it privileged his thoughts about poetry - his own and other people's. The new edition includes the final ten years of Spender's life and provides access to the more intimate thoughts and feelings of the private man, but equally documents his life as a public intellectual who played a part in shaping the European literary and intellectual culture of his age.As we look back on the dramatic events of the twentieth century, we find that Spender was involved in many of them: the reconstruction of Germany and the construction of Europe (as Unesco's first Literary Councillor), the development of the cultural Cold War (as editor of Encounter), the founding of Israel, the anti-Vietnam movement in America. The Journals provide a personal version of sixty turbulent years of the twentieth century, hovering between diary, autobiography and history.

Stephen Spender, along with his friends W. H. Auden, Louis MacNeice and C. Day Lewis, rose to prominence in the 1930s, writing powerfully of the fear and paranoia of a continent heading towards war. By the time of his death in 1995 he had established a distinguished reputation as a poet, critic, editor and translator. This New Collected Poems, edited by Michael Brett, gathers seven decades of verse from Poems (1933) to Dolphins (1994) and the late uncollected work. Reordering the thematic principle of the 1985 Collected Poems, this edition returns to a book-by-book chronology and allows the reader to experience, for the first time, the full development and range of his career.

Große Freiheit 1929Zehn Jahre nach dem Ende des 1. Weltkriegs betritt Paul Schoner Feindesland: in Hamburg besucht er Ernst Stockmann, den er in Oxford kennen gelernt. Die Brutalität des ersten Weltkriegs hatte die Menschen in vielerlei Hinsicht traumatisiert. Im prüden England ist jedermann verzweifelt bemüht, trotz allem die gewohnte Lebensweise aufrechtzuerhalten. Wie anders dagegen Deutschland: In Wandervogel und Körperkultur manifestiert sich ein Aufbruch der Jugend, der alle Welt in Staunen versetzt.Pauls Hamburger Gastgeber entstammt einer reichen Patrizierfamilie, deren großbürgerliche Lebensweise sich dieser Entwicklung stur widersetzt. Schon bald entflieht Paul ihrer pompösen, aber finsteren Villa an der Alster. In Joachim Lenz, einem "missratenen" Kaufmannssohn, lernt er bald einen wirklichen Freund kennen, mit dem zusammen er Strandbäder und Nachtbars erkundet und schließlich –- zusammen mit einem gemeinsamen "Lover" – eine Wanderung entlang des Rheins unternimmt.Joachim ist ein Repräsentant des "modernen" Deutschland: Er fotografiert, will sich aber nicht als Künstler verstanden wissen und er liebt junge Männer, die ihn sofort langweilen, wenn sie seine Gefühle erwidern. Während ihrer Wanderung gelingt es Paul und Joachim, das Lebensgefühl des anderen besser zu verstehen; sie wünschen sich, dass diese Reise niemals enden möge. Als die Nazis in Deutschland immer stärker werden und sogar Joachims Studio verwüsten, verlässt Paul Hamburg, um in Berlin seinen Studienfreund Bradshaw zu besuchen.Spender hat dieses ungemein plastische Porträt einer Epoche unmittelbar nach seiner Rückkehr aus Deutschland geschrieben. Paul Schoner ist darin das Alter Ego des Autors, Joachim Lenz ist als der Fotograf Herbert List und Spenders Freund Bradshaw als Christopher Isherwood zu erkennen. Auch Ernst Stockmann wurde nach einer realen Figur gezeichnet, die für den Fall einer Veröffentlichung allerdings mit rechtlichen Schritten drohte – einer von mehreren Gründen, aus denen der Roman zunächst nicht gedruckt wurde. 1986, fast am Ende seines Lebens, hat Spender diesen frühen Entwurf überarbeitet, sodass sein Buch die authentische Frische des eigenen Erlebens mit dem Wissen verbindet, was später geschah. Ein großer Roman über den Freiheitsdrang einer jungen Generation und Deutschland am Wendepunkt der Zwischenkriegszeit.

Ende der 1920er Jahre reist der prüde Engländer Paul Schoner nach Hamburg. Die lustvolle Bejahung des menschlichen Körpers, die er hier in Strandbädern und Nachtbars erlebt, ist für ihn eine Offenbarung. Er befreundet sich mit dem jungen Fotografen Joachim Lenz, der den Aufbruch der befreiten Jugend in Bildern festhält. Die Beiden reisen durchs Land, genießen die Freizügigkeit. Doch Paul nimmt auch einen Wandel wahr. Die Weltwirtschaftskrise hinterlässt Spuren, antisemitische und nationale Töne werden lauter. Als Nazis Joachims Wohnung verwüsten, wird die Bedrohung real.Als "komplexes Gebilde aus Erinnerung, Fiktion und nachträglicher Erkenntnis" bezeichnete Spender selbst diesen Roman, den er Mitte der 1980er mithilfe von Tagebuchaufzeichnungen über zwei Deutschlandaufenthalte anno 1929 und 1932 vollendete. In der Figur des Joachim Lenz ist unschwer Fotograf Herbert List zu erkennen, mit dem Spender befreundet war, weiterhin treten Christopher Isherwood und W. H. Auden als William Bradshaw und Simon Wilmot auf. "Der Tempel" ist ein großer Roman über den Freiheitsdrang einer jungen Generation und ein Land am Vorabend der politischen Katastrophe, der im Angesicht des Erstarkens Neuer Rechter eine beklemmende Aktualität erfährt.

El dios que fracasó es una obra clásica, un documento esencial de la Guerra Fría, que reúne los testimonios de algunos de los escritores más importantes del siglo xx acerca de su fascinación por el comunismo y su posterior desilusión.El premio Nobel francés André Gide; el poeta y narrador afroamericano Richard Wright, autor de Hijo de esta tierra, uno de los relatos más crudos sobre el racismo en su país; el luchador antifascista y novelista italiano Ignazio Silone; el poeta británico Stephen Spender; el narrador y ensayista Arthur Koestler, y el periodista estadounidense Louis Fischer, biógrafo de Lenin y Gandhi, cuentan cómo la búsqueda de un mundo mejor y el rechazo a las injusticias del capitalismo los llevó a abrazar el comunismo como una nueva religión, defendiéndola con el celo del converso.Cada uno de ellos fue descubriendo, más tarde, la verdadera naturaleza del credo político al que habían consagrado su fe. Aquel amor inicial se transformó en rechazo y horror al descubrir que, tras los bellos ideales, se escondían crímenes atroces y retrocesos enormes en las libertades, de los que habían sido cómplices involuntarios. Sin abandonar la preocupación por la justicia, sus relatos apóstatas nos ayudan a entender la mentalidad fanática que puede carcomer una sociedad.«Justificar la mentira, la deshonestidad o el crimen, compartir una fe gregaria y estar en posesión de la única verdad me parecen elementos totalitarios que no han variado ni un milímetro desde 1950. Incluso entre tanta gente que se cree demócrata».Félix de Azúa