Oxford Studies in Disability Ethics and Society – serie

Proper treatment of people with disabilities should not incur any head scratching. Yet for many, it requires a multifaceted and thoroughly considered approach. Respecting people with disabilities can involve a plethora of considerations and approaches to social relations and care: how we interact with them in interpersonal contexts, what kinds of attitudes we have toward them, how we relate with them, and how people with disabilities regard and treat ourselves. Drawing on the author's own perspective and experiences as a disabled person, Adam Cureton emphasizes the importance of relationships, ideals, virtues, and attitudes in how we approach ethical issues that concern disability, and explores the nature and moral importance of respect for people with disabilities and of respect for ourselves. The book explores ways to understand and evaluate one's own disability and how to maintain one's self-respect in the face of disparaging social pressures. It also addresses unique moral challenges that disabled people face and characterizes some guiding moral ideals of self-respect for navigating these complex situations. Cureton emphasizes the importance of expressing respect for disabled people. By distinguishing several different kinds of respect for people with disabilities, he shows how many of the common attitudes that even well-meaning people have towards those with disabilities are complicated and morally problematic. Through these intricacies, he charts a nuanced path forward. This book speaks to disabled people and others with experience of disability to help people understand and evaluate the many ways we can properly respect disability.

Proper treatment of people with disabilities should not incur any head scratching. Yet for many, it requires a multifaceted and thoroughly considered approach. Respecting people with disabilities can involve a plethora of considerations and approaches to social relations and care: how we interact with them in interpersonal contexts, what kinds of attitudes we have toward them, how we relate with them, and how people with disabilities regard and treat ourselves. Drawing on the author's own perspective and experiences as a disabled person, Adam Cureton emphasizes the importance of relationships, ideals, virtues, and attitudes in how we approach ethical issues that concern disability, and explores the nature and moral importance of respect for people with disabilities and of respect for ourselves. The book explores ways to understand and evaluate one's own disability and how to maintain one's self-respect in the face of disparaging social pressures. It also addresses unique moral challenges that disabled people face and characterizes some guiding moral ideals of self-respect for navigating these complex situations. Cureton emphasizes the importance of expressing respect for disabled people. By distinguishing several different kinds of respect for people with disabilities, he shows how many of the common attitudes that even well-meaning people have towards those with disabilities are complicated and morally problematic. Through these intricacies, he charts a nuanced path forward. This book speaks to disabled people and others with experience of disability to help people understand and evaluate the many ways we can properly respect disability.

Making Us New argues not only that modernist writers were influenced byeugenic and early transhumanist thinking, but that Anglo-American modernistculture was saturated with ideas and shaped by debates about making humans new.Maren Linett explores cultural expressions of, and interventions into, eugenic andtranshumanist thought by excavating and analyzing four key sets of debates betweenand among eugenicists and transhumanists. The first set of debates relates to the body:what sorts of bodies, and especially what sorts of sensory organs, should improved peoplehave? The second set surrounds reproduction: how might we produce new human beingsvia reproduction? The third set concerns racial difference: in what ways will race betransformed for future people? And the final set involves animality: how mightanimality be either left behind by or useful for these improved people?Linett carefully distinguishes between the two modes of human improvement andtheir ethical and political implications, while viewing both eugenics and transhumanismas simultaneously utopian and oppressive--oppressive not only because of their real-worldapplications but because of their false assumptions about human worth. The studyforegrounds the fundamental aims of eugenic and transhumanist thought--to shapeand control human evolutionary futures--contending that eugenics and transhumanismare part of the larger modernist quest to make it new.

Making Us New argues not only that modernist writers were influenced byeugenic and early transhumanist thinking, but that Anglo-American modernistculture was saturated with ideas and shaped by debates about making humans new.Maren Linett explores cultural expressions of, and interventions into, eugenic andtranshumanist thought by excavating and analyzing four key sets of debates betweenand among eugenicists and transhumanists. The first set of debates relates to the body:what sorts of bodies, and especially what sorts of sensory organs, should improved peoplehave? The second set surrounds reproduction: how might we produce new human beingsvia reproduction? The third set concerns racial difference: in what ways will race betransformed for future people? And the final set involves animality: how mightanimality be either left behind by or useful for these improved people?Linett carefully distinguishes between the two modes of human improvement andtheir ethical and political implications, while viewing both eugenics and transhumanismas simultaneously utopian and oppressive--oppressive not only because of their real-worldapplications but because of their false assumptions about human worth. The studyforegrounds the fundamental aims of eugenic and transhumanist thought--to shapeand control human evolutionary futures--contending that eugenics and transhumanismare part of the larger modernist quest to make it new.

If you are an advocate for people with disabilities, should you also be vegan? How does your position on assisted suicide relate to how you think about euthanizing pets? Recent work in disability studies has called for greater engagement with animal studies, but disability activists and scholars have long been uncomfortable with comparisons between animals and people with disabilities or chronic and terminal illnesses. The long and problematic history of dehumanizing and animalizing disabled people has often led to the need to reclaim their humanity and basic human rights. What, then, should be the relationship between disability and animal rights? Disanimality reveals how certain forms of animal advocacy can lead to greater discomfort for disability activists, such as universalist calls for veganism and abolitionist animal rights. The result can be what Lundblad calls disanimality, a feeling of discomfort which can be produced when overly simplistic comparisons are made between animals and people with disabilities. Disanimality argues instead for staying with the trouble of historically and culturally situated analysis, foregrounding posthumanist approaches to both animal and disability studies in relation to contemporary novels, films, and memoirs. Closer attention to the ways that disability, illness, and animality meet can lead not only to new theoretical tools and concepts, but also better potential for coalitions between advocacy movements.