Christoph Schuringa – författare
746 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
This book presents 12 original essays on historical and contemporary philosophical discussions of judgment. The central issues explored in this volume can be separated into two groups namely, those concerning the act and object of judgment. What kind of act is judgment? How is it related to a range of other mental acts, states, and dispositions? Where and how does assertive force enter in? Is there a distinct category of negative judgments, or are these simply judgments whose objects are negative? Concerning the object of judgment: How many objects are there of a given judgment? One, as on the dual relation theory of Frege and Moore? Or many as in Russell’s later multiple relation theory? If there is a single object, is it a proposition? And if so, is it a force-neutral, abstract entity that might equally figure as the object of a range of intentional attitudes? Or is it somehow constitutively tied to the act itself? These and related questions are approached from a variety of historical and contemporary perspectives. This book sheds new light on current controversies by drawing on the details of the distinct intellectual contexts in which previous philosophers’ positions about the nature of judgment were formulated. In turn, new directions in present-day research promise to raise novel interpretive prospects and challenges in the history of philosophy.
746 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
This book presents 12 original essays on historical and contemporary philosophical discussions of judgment. The central issues explored in this volume can be separated into two groups namely, those concerning the act and object of judgment. What kind of act is judgment? How is it related to a range of other mental acts, states, and dispositions? Where and how does assertive force enter in? Is there a distinct category of negative judgments, or are these simply judgments whose objects are negative? Concerning the object of judgment: How many objects are there of a given judgment? One, as on the dual relation theory of Frege and Moore? Or many as in Russell’s later multiple relation theory? If there is a single object, is it a proposition? And if so, is it a force-neutral, abstract entity that might equally figure as the object of a range of intentional attitudes? Or is it somehow constitutively tied to the act itself? These and related questions are approached from a variety of historical and contemporary perspectives. This book sheds new light on current controversies by drawing on the details of the distinct intellectual contexts in which previous philosophers’ positions about the nature of judgment were formulated. In turn, new directions in present-day research promise to raise novel interpretive prospects and challenges in the history of philosophy.
1 175 kr
Skickas inom 7-10 vardagar
1 374 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
1 374 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
656 kr
Skickas inom 10-15 vardagar
2 193 kr
Skickas inom 10-15 vardagar
369 kr
Skickas inom 3-6 vardagar
244 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
202 kr
Kommande
309 kr
Kommande
“Shuringas bok är omöjlig att lägga ifrån sig.” – Slavoj Žižek Analytisk filosofi är den ledande formen av filosofi i den svenska och engelskspråkiga universitetsvärlden. Men vad har egentligen föranlett dess hegemoniska position? I Analytisk filosofi – en socialhistorisk granskning visar den brittiske filosofen Christoph Schuringa att svaret inte bara handlar om interna filosofiska framsteg, utan om ett komplext samspel mellan idéer, institutioner och politik. Den analytiska filosofin har inte bara formats av sin tid, utan också av en empiristisk, liberal världsbild. Begrepp som objektivitet, rationalitet och fakta fungerar här inte bara som metodideal, utan uttrycker också en abstraherad syn på världen – som något stabilt och omedelbart tillgängligt för ett autonomt subjekt, frikopplat från historiska och samhälleliga sammanhang. Vad står då på spel? Om vi okritiskt accepterar den analytiska filosofins självbild som neutral och opolitisk, riskerar dess metodideal – klarhet, analys av avgränsade problem och fokus på fakta – att sätta gränserna för vad som överhuvudtaget räknas som filosofiskt relevant. Frågan är inte bara varför den analytiska filosofin blivit så inflytelserik, utan vad denna dominans gör med filosofin själv.