Mary Margaret McCabe – författare
1 048 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
1 629 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
578 kr
Skickas inom 7-10 vardagar
1 575 kr
Skickas inom 7-10 vardagar
1 292 kr
Skickas inom 7-10 vardagar
623 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
829 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
Contradicting the long-held belief that Aristotle was the first to discuss individuation systematically, Mary Margaret McCabe argues that Plato was concerned with what makes something a something and that he solved the problem in a radically different way than did Aristotle. McCabe explores the centrality of individuation to Plato''s thinking, from the Parmenides to the Politicus, illuminating Plato''s later metaphysics in an exciting new way. Tradition associates Plato with the contrast between the particulars of the sensible world and transcendent forms, and supposes that therein lies the center of Plato''s metaphysical universe. McCabe rebuts this view, arguing that Plato''s thinking about individuals--which informs all his thought--comes to focus on the tension between "generous" or complex individuals and "austere" or simple individuals. In dialogues such as the Theaetetus and the Timaeus Plato repeatedly poses the question of individuation but cannot provide an answer. Later, in the Sophist, the Philebus, and the Politicus, Plato devises what McCabe calls the "mesh of identity," an account of how individuals may be identified relative to each other. The mesh of identity, however, fails to explain satisfactorily how individuals are unified or made coherent. McCabe asserts that individuation may be absolute--and she questions philosophy''s longtime reliance on Aristotle''s solution.
1 438 kr
Skickas
1 595 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
1 610 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
Perception and its puzzles have given rise to philosophical reflection from antiquity to recent times: What do we perceive? How do we talk about what we perceive? What is the nature of our subjective experience? How can we talk about our subjective experience? In this book a distinguished group of philosophers addresses questions like these by drawing on historical and contemporary sources, illuminating the intersections between historical and contemporary philosophical discussion. They ask about the way things look; about how we can perceive a particular object (and no other); about self-perception; and about the nature and explanation of our phenomenal experience, and our talk about it. The book provides important new work in a central philosophical area.