478 kr
Beställningsvara. Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar. Fri frakt över 249 kr.
Beskrivning
This book is based on a national literature search focusing on the best practices of cities, of all sizes and geographic locations, intended to maintain public services while holding down taxes. Many public officials have great ideas, but tend to work in a vacuum, so they don't know what other cities are doing. This volume codifies knowledge in this new field for the first time. Every case study included in this book has the city's website listed. This reference work makes it easy for professionals seeking additional information on any and all budget reduction methods that seem to work somewhere.
Produktinformation
- Utgivningsdatum:2012-05-23
- Mått:178 x 254 x 14 mm
- Vikt:481 g
- Format:Häftad
- Språk:Engelska
- Antal sidor:277
- Förlag:McFarland & Co Inc
- ISBN:9780786463749
Utforska kategorier
Mer om författaren
Roger L. Kemp, Ph.D., ICMA-CM, has been a city manager on both the East and West coasts for more than 25 years. He is presently Distinguished Adjunct Professor of Public Administration at Golden Gate University and a Fellow of The Academy of Political Science.
Innehållsförteckning
- Table of ContentsAcknowledgments viiiPreface Part I. Introduction1. The Fiscal Crisis and America’s CitiesDerek Okubo 2. Balancing Budgets with Job and Service ReductionsChristopher W. Hoene and Jacqueline J. Byers 3. Prudent Options for Balancing City BudgetsRoger L. Kemp 4. Saving Money by Contracting for Public ServicesAmanda M. Girth and Jocelyn M. Johnston 5. Innovative Staffing Options Help Balance BudgetsLaura Kushner 6. Evaluating the Results of Staffing Decisions BeforehandLisa Rund and 7. Options to Ensure Fiscal Health During Tough TimesAlan Kemp 8. Strategies to Ensure Long-Term Fiscal HealthJeff Schott 9. Financial Measures to Restore America’s InfrastructureNancy Mann Jackson Part II. Best Practices10. Ann Arbor Uses Economic Development to Increase Its RevenuesCraig Chavez 11. Arlington and Other Cities Share Services to Reduce CostsMonte Mercer 12. Auburn and Adjoining City Consolidate ServicesLiz Chapman Mockler 13. Boca Raton Develops Long-Range Financial PlansLinda C. Davidson 14. Chandler and Other Cities Use Volunteers to Provide ServicesDavid Bigos 15. Charlotte and Other Cities Implement Employee Wellness ProgramsRobert Barkin 16. Chicago Uses Citizen Input to Make Budget DecisionsJosh Lerner 17. Cincinnati and Other Cities Improve Public Trust in GovernmentSheryl Sculley 18. Colorado Springs Uses Citizens to Evaluate Public ServicesZach Patton 19. Coral Springs and Other Cities Focus on Financial PlanningShayne Kavanagh 20. Denver and Other Cities Use Performance Results to Make Budget DecisionsMelanie McKinney-Gonzales 21. Des Moines and Other Cities Seek Citizen Input on Public ServicesBarbara J. Cohn Berman 22. Elgin and Other Cities Use Public Managers to Address Fiscal IssuesElizabeth Kellar 23. Eugene Uses Citizens to Improve Its Budget ProcessDonald J. Borut, Melissa Germanese and William Barnes 24. Gardena’s Public Manager Improves City FinancesLynn Peisner 25. Hanover and Other Cities Implement Generic Service ReductionsJoe Casey and Shayne Kavanagh 26. Harrisburg and Other Cities Revise Their Property Tax StructureWalter Rybeck 27. Las Vegas and Other Cities Reassess Their Basic ServicesKaren Thoreson and James H. Svara 28. Lewiston and Other Cities Consider Property Tax Relief for Senior CitizensDouglas Rooks 29. New York Provides Special Services to Low-Income CitizensGordon Berlin and James Riccio 30. Peoria Uses Performance Measures to Improve Its Budget ProcessPeter Christensen and Katie Gregory 31. Philadelphia and Other Cities Reconsider Their Contract ServicesRussell Nichols 32. Portland Uses a New Financial Management Assessment ProcessMichael Bailey, Karen Feher and Shayne Kavanagh 33. Provo Uses Employees and Citizens to Balance Its BudgetJohn Borget 34. Redlands Uses Citizens to Provide Public ServicesJohn Buntin 35. Roanoke Encourages Citizens to Provide Tax ReliefAnn H. Shawver 36. Rochester and Other Cities Seek Additional Funding SourcesKathleen Gray 37. Rockland and Other Cities Are Impacted by Senior CitizensJeff Clark 38. St. Paul and Other Cities Consider Flexible Scheduling to Save MoneyClaudia Hoffacker 39. San Diego Uses Management and Labor to Solve Budget ProblemsJay M. Goldstone 40. San Jose Solicits Feedback on Services from EmployeesBrooke A. Myhre 41. Sandy Springs and Other Cities Contract for Public Works ServicesRobert Barkin 42. Savannah Uses a Budgeting for Results ProcessEva Elmer and Christopher Morrill 43. Seattle and Other Cities Implement Joint Purchasing ProgramsConnie Kuranko 44. Springfield and Other Cities Reduce Their Energy CostsJohn W. DeWitt 45. Walnut Creek and Other Cities Implement New Budget ProcessesShayne Kavanagh, Jon Johnson and Chris Fabian 46. Waukesha and Other Cities Reduce Health Costs for Their Aging EmployeesRobert Barkin 47. West Palm Beach Provides Successful Social Service ProgramsAlan Brown 48. Westminster Uses Performance Results to Improve ServicesBrent McFall 49. Worcester Uses an Independent Source to Measure Service PerformanceRoberta R. Schaefer Part III. The Future50. City Revenues, Budgets and the FutureChristopher W. Hoene 51. Financial Constraints and New Service OpportunitiesWilliam Barnes 52. Redefining the Quality of Life in Your CommunityThomas L. Miller and Shannon E. Hayden 53. The Condition of America’s InfrastructureRoger L. Kemp 54. Cities, New Technologies and Public ServicesMarcel Bullinga 55. City Government Options for Public Service InnovationsChristopher Hire 56. The Financial Future of America’s CitiesRoger L. Kemp AppendicesA. Local Government Financial Terms B. Regional Resource Directory C. National Resource Directory D. City Management Officials State Chapter Directory E. Finance Officials State Chapter Directory F. State Municipal League Directory G. State Library Directory About the Editors and Contributors Index