Robert P. George – författare
251 kr
Skickas
673 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
879 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
552 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
679 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
1 115 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
1 353 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
1 364 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
996 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
2 500 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
353 kr
Skickas inom 7-10 vardagar
1 107 kr
Skickas inom 7-10 vardagar
426 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
478 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
661 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
What does it mean to have a constitution? Scholars and students associated with Walter Murphy at Princeton University have long asked this question in their exploration of constitutional politics and judicial behavior. These scholars, concerned with the making, maintenance, and deliberate change of the Constitution, have made unique and significant contributions to our understanding of American constitutional law by going against the norm of court-centered and litigation-minded research. Beginning in the late 1970s, this new wave of academics explored questions ranging from the nature of creating the U.S. Constitution to the philosophy behind amending it. In this collection, Sotirios A. Barber and Robert P. George bring together fourteen essays by members of this Princeton group--some of the most distinguished scholars in the field. These works consider the meaning of having a constitution, the implications of particular choices in the design of constitutions, and the meaning of judicial supremacy in the interpretation of the Constitution. The overarching ambition of this collection is to awaken a constitutionalist consciousness in its readers--to view themselves as potential makers and changers of constitutions, as opposed to mere subjects of existing arrangements. In addition to the editors, the contributors are Walter F. Murphy, John E. Finn, Christopher L. Eisgruber, James E. Fleming, Jeffrey K. Tulis, Suzette Hemberger, Stephen Macedo, Sanford Levinson, H. N. Hirsch, Wayne D. Moore, Keith E. Whittington, and Mark E. Brandon.
189 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
177 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
457 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
1 853 kr
Skickas inom 7-10 vardagar
772 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
1 107 kr
Skickas inom 7-10 vardagar
1 697 kr
Skickas inom 7-10 vardagar
502 kr
Skickas inom 7-10 vardagar
289 kr
Skickas inom 7-10 vardagar
610 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
610 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
348 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
348 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
534 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
Slavery, segregation, abortion, workers'' rights, the power of the courts. These issues have been at the heart of the greatest constitutional controversies in American history. And in this concise and thought-provoking volume, some of today''s most distinguished legal scholars and commentators explain for a general audience how five landmark Supreme Court cases centered on those controversies shaped the country''s destiny and continue to affect us even now. The book is a profound exploration of the Supreme Court''s importance to America''s social and political life. It is also, as many of the contributors show, an intriguing reflection of what some have seen as an important trend in legal scholarship away from an uncritical belief in the essentially benign nature of judicial power. Robert George opens with an illuminating survey of the themes that unite and divide the five cases. Other contributors then examine each case in detail through a lively commentary-and-response format. Mark Tushnet and Jeremy Waldron exchange views on Marbury v. Madison, the pivotal 1803 case that established the power of the courts to invalidate legislation. Cass Sunstein and James McPherson discuss Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857), the notorious case that confirmed the rights of slaveowners, declared that black people could not be American citizens, and is often seen as a cause of the Civil War. Hadley Arkes and Donald Drakeman explore the legacy of Lochner v. New York (1905), a case that ushered in decades of judicial hostility to social welfare laws. Earl Maltz and Walter Murphy assess Brown v. Topeka Board of Education (1954), the famous case that ended racial segregation in public schools. Finally, Jean Bethke Elshtain and George Will tackle Roe v. Wade (1973), still a flashpoint a quarter of a century later in the debate over abortion. While some of the contributors show sympathy for strong judicial interventions on social issues, many across the ideological spectrum are sharply critical of judicial activism. A compelling introduction to the greatest cases in U.S. constitutional law, this is also an enlightening glimpse of the state of the art in American legal scholarship.
161 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar