It places China’s accusations of bias against the Tribunal in the context of China’s domestic situation, and concludes that the Tribunal, acting independently and impartially, was able to perform the judicial function, despite China’s default.
Alfredo C. Robles Jr. is a University Fellow at De La Salle University, Philippines. He holds doctorate degrees from the Université Paris 1 (Panthéon-Sorbonne), and Syracuse University. He is the author of French Theories of Regulation and Conceptions of the International Division of Labour (1994), The Political Economy of Interregional Relations: ASEAN and the EU (2004), The Asia-Europe Meeting: The Theory and Practice of Interregionalism (2008), The South China Sea Arbitration: Understanding the Awards and Debating with China (2018), Endangered Species and Fragile Ecosystems in the South China Sea: The Philippines v. China Arbitration (2020), and Vessel Collisions in the Law of the Sea: The South China Sea Arbitration (2022).
Innehållsförteckning
Chapter 1: Introduction.- Chapter 2: The Defaulting State and the Jurisdiction of Annex VII Arbitral Tribunals.- Chapter 3: The Defaulting State and Fact-finding in the South China Sea Arbitration.- Chapter 4: The Defaulting State and the Experts in the South China Sea Arbitration.- Chapter 5: The Defaulting State, the Appointing Authority, and the Judges In the South China Sea Arbitration.- Chapter 6: Summary and Conclusions.