Curtis N. Johnson is Robert B. Pamplin, Jr. Professor of Government and Dean of the College at Lewis & Clark College.

Socrates and the Immoralists is a dense read filled with the usual analytic tools: abbreviations (PH, EH), reconstructed arguments (S3a, S3b), and detailed appeal to the secondary literature. Not that there is anything wrong with that. Indeed, this work will serve as a good review of a central issue in Socratic studies.

• Chapter 1 PrefacePart 2 SocratesChapter 3 Socrates' MissionChapter 4 Was Socrates Just?Chapter 5 Socrates' Choice for Justice: Apology and CritoPart 6 Socrates' Immoralist OpponentsChapter 7 Socrates' Immoral Opponents and the Failure of Moral ReformChapter 8 Socrates v. PolusChapter 9 Socrates v. Callicles Part I: Natural JusticeChapter 10 Socrates v. Callicles Part II: Unqualified HedonismChapter 11 Socrates v. Thrasymachus Part I: Thrasymachus' World ViewChapter 12 Socrates v. Thrasumachus Part II: Is Thrasymachus Refuted?Part 13 The Happiness of the Just LifeChapter 14 Socrates and ProtagorasChapter 15 Evaluative and Psychological HedonismChapter 16 Pleasure, Virtue, and Happiness

Curtis N. Johnson is Robert B. Pamplin, Jr. Professor of Government and Dean of the College at Lewis & Clark College.

Socrates and the Immoralists is a dense read filled with the usual analytic tools: abbreviations (PH, EH), reconstructed arguments (S3a, S3b), and detailed appeal to the secondary literature. Not that there is anything wrong with that. Indeed, this work will serve as a good review of a central issue in Socratic studies.

• Chapter 1 PrefacePart 2 SocratesChapter 3 Socrates' MissionChapter 4 Was Socrates Just?Chapter 5 Socrates' Choice for Justice: Apology and CritoPart 6 Socrates' Immoralist OpponentsChapter 7 Socrates' Immoral Opponents and the Failure of Moral ReformChapter 8 Socrates v. PolusChapter 9 Socrates v. Callicles Part I: Natural JusticeChapter 10 Socrates v. Callicles Part II: Unqualified HedonismChapter 11 Socrates v. Thrasymachus Part I: Thrasymachus' World ViewChapter 12 Socrates v. Thrasumachus Part II: Is Thrasymachus Refuted?Part 13 The Happiness of the Just LifeChapter 14 Socrates and ProtagorasChapter 15 Evaluative and Psychological HedonismChapter 16 Pleasure, Virtue, and Happiness

Curtis N. Johnson is Robert B. Pamplin, Jr. Professor of Government and Dean of the College at Lewis & Clark College.

Socrates and the Immoralists is a dense read filled with the usual analytic tools: abbreviations (PH, EH), reconstructed arguments (S3a, S3b), and detailed appeal to the secondary literature. Not that there is anything wrong with that. Indeed, this work will serve as a good review of a central issue in Socratic studies.

• Chapter 1 PrefacePart 2 SocratesChapter 3 Socrates' MissionChapter 4 Was Socrates Just?Chapter 5 Socrates' Choice for Justice: Apology and CritoPart 6 Socrates' Immoralist OpponentsChapter 7 Socrates' Immoral Opponents and the Failure of Moral ReformChapter 8 Socrates v. PolusChapter 9 Socrates v. Callicles Part I: Natural JusticeChapter 10 Socrates v. Callicles Part II: Unqualified HedonismChapter 11 Socrates v. Thrasymachus Part I: Thrasymachus' World ViewChapter 12 Socrates v. Thrasumachus Part II: Is Thrasymachus Refuted?Part 13 The Happiness of the Just LifeChapter 14 Socrates and ProtagorasChapter 15 Evaluative and Psychological HedonismChapter 16 Pleasure, Virtue, and Happiness