Analogy and Exemplary Reasoning in Legal Discourse

Hendrik Kaptein is associate professor of jurisprudence at Leiden University. He published widely on legal argumentation, see for example Legal evidence and proof: statistics, stories, logic (Ashgate, 2009, with H. Prakken & B. Verheij) Bastiaan D. van der Velden (1970) obtained his PhD in 2004 with a dissertation on the historical development of legislation on the use of Frisian in the Netherlands (Waar gaan wij heen met het Fries?). From 2006 to 2009 he was associate professor at the University of the Netherlands Antilles in Curaçao. His legal history of Curaçao was published in 2011: Ik lach met Grotius, en alle prullen van boeken (Amsterdam: SWP). He is currently a lecturer at the Open University where he teaches legal history and wrote a textbook for this course.

• Introduction A. Amaya, Imitation and analogy S. Brewer, Indefeasible analogical argument B. Brozek, Is analogy a form of legal reasoning? D. Canale & G. Tuzet, Analogical reasoning and extensive interpretation D. Duarte, Analogy and balancing: the partial reducibility thesis and its problems B. Brozek, Analogy and balancing: a reply to David Duarte D. Duarte, Analogy and balancing once again: a reply to Bartosz Bro?ek M. Golding, Argument by analogy in the law H.J.R. Kaptein, Undoing damage by analogy: as if (almost) nothing happened, with notes on the meaning of everything B.D. van der Velden, Analogy in the strict liability rules in the Dutch Civil Code, Bibliography, Index