John Fennell is Associate Professor of Philosophy at Grinnell College in Grinnell, Iowa.

""Fennell’s Critical Introduction to the Philosophy of Language is a fine supplementary text for an undergraduate introduction to the field."--Russell Marcus in Teaching Philosophy"John Fennell weaves crystal clear, careful expositions, and exciting discussions of key figures in the analytic philosophy of language and logic into a sweeping historical narrative, bringing these figures into lively conversation with each other and placing their ideas and concerns into the context of larger developments in modern theoretical philosophy. Highly recommended both as a companion for the student and a refresher and resource for the seasoned practitioner."--Ronald Loeffler, Grand Valley State University

• Introduction: Logico-Semantics, Logical Positivism and their DiscontentsChapter One: The Classical Empiricist Account of Meaning§ 1.1: The Inessentiality of language§ 1.2: The "‘Idea’ Idea"§ 1.3: The Primacy of the Naming Relation§ 1.4: The Linguistic Turn, Anti-Psychologism, and the Primacy of the Sentence§ 1.5: Logical AnalysisChapter Two: Classical Empiricism and the Problem of the A Priori: Mill, Kant, and Frege§ 2.1: Some Background Distinctions: A Priori/A Posteriori, Analytic/Synthetic, Necessary/Contingent§ 2.2: Mill§ 2.3: Kant§ 2.4: Frege§ 2.5: Appendix: Russell’s Set-Theoretic ParadoxChapter Three: Frege’s Begriffsschrift§ 3.1: Logic and its Limitations§ 3.2: Function and Argument§ 3.3: Predicates, Quantifiers and the Solution to the Problem of Multiple Generality§ 3.4: Sentence Connectives and the Solution to the Problem of a Unified Logical Notation§ 3.5: Identity§ 3.6: Appendix: Concordance between Begriffsschrift Notation and the Kalish/Montague/Mar NotationChapter Four: Frege on Sense and Reference§ 4.1: Three Semantic Puzzles for a Reference-Only (Extensionalist) Account of Meaning§ 4.2: The Sense/Reference Distinction§ 4.3: The Problems of Non-Referring Singular Terms and Identity Statements§ 4.4: The Problem of Belief Contexts§ 4.5: Problems with Frege’s Solution§ 4.6: Definite Descriptions and Some Further Consequences of Frege’s Sense/Reference DistinctionChapter Five: Russell’s Theory of Descriptions§ 5.1: Scope and Basic Strategy of the Theory of Descriptions§ 5.2: The Theory Applied to Definite Descriptions, including Non-Referring Definite Descriptions§ 5.3: Four Key Features of Russell’s Analysis of Definite Descriptions§ 5.4: Russell’s Solutions to Some Semantic Puzzles§ 5.5: Russell’s Theory and Excluded Middle§ 5.6: Critical Discussion (I): Strawson§ 5.7: Critical Discussion (II): Donnellan Chapter Six: Kripke’s Causal Theory of Reference§ 6.1: Core Features of Russell’s Theory§ 6.2: Three Key Problems for Russell’s Description Theory§ 6.3: The Cluster Theory and its Analogous Problems§ 6.4: Correct Descriptions are neither Necessary nor Sufficient for Names to Refer§ 6.5: The Causal Theory of Reference-Grounding and Reference-Borrowing§ 6.6: The Causal Theory’s Solution to the Three Problems§ 6.7: Rigid Designation and Necessary A Posteriori Propositions§ 6.8: The Distinction between Fixing the Reference and Giving the Meaning§ 6.9: The Contingency of ‘Hesperus is the evening star’ v. The Necessity of ‘Hesperus is Phosphorus’§ 6.10: Problems for Kripke’s ViewChapter Seven: Logical Positivism I: Ayer§ 7.1: Three Central Doctrines of Logical Positivism§ 7.2: Realist v. Anti-Realist Accounts of Meaning§ 7.3: Versions of the Verification Principle§ 7.4: The Problem of the A Priori (again)§ 7.5: Questions regarding Conventionalism about Necessity and LogicChapter Eight: Logical Positivism II: Carnap§ 8.1: Conventionalism§ 8.2: Linguistic Frameworks§ 8.3: Internal v. External Questions and Formal v. Material Mode§ 8.4: Metaphysics and Tolerance§ 8.5: The Status of PhilosophyChapter Nine: Quine’s Critique of Positivism I: ‘Two Dogmas of Empiricism’§ 9.1: ‘No Entity without Identity’§ 9.2: Two Different Conceptions of Synonymy: Definition and Substitution§ 9.3: Epistemic Holism and the Rejection of Meaning and Synonymy§ 9.4: Epistemic Holism and the Elimination of the Analytic/Synthetic Distinction§ 9.5: Epistemic Holism and the Web of Belief§ 9.6: Epistemic Holism, Fallibilism and the History of ScienceChapter Ten: Quine’s Critique of Positivism II: Anti-Conventionalism§ 10.1: Quine’s Problems with Conventionalism§ 10.2: Quine’s Pragmatic Account of Logic and Necessity§ 10.3: Problems with Quine’s Pragmatization of Logic: Dummett and DavidsonChapter Eleven: Quine: Radical Translation and the Indeterminacy of Meaning§ 11.1: Occasion Sentences, Standing Sentences, Stimulus Meaning, and Stimulus Synonymy§ 11.2: The Argument for Indeterminacy: Holism and Behaviorism§ 11.3: First-Personal and Ontological Indeterminacy v. Third-Personal and Epistemological Under-Determination§ 11.4: The Principle of Charity: Pragmatic or Constitutive§ 11.5: Some Problems with Charity and Logic.Chapter Twelve: Later-Wittgenstein I: Ordinary Language Philosophy and the Critique of Ostension§ 12.1: Ordinary Language Philosophy, Grammatical Investigations and Language Games§ 12.2: The Critique of the Augustinian Picture: The Language Games of the Grocer and the Builders§ 12.3: Wittgenstein’s Critique of Ostensive DefinitionChapter Thirteen: Later-Wittgenstein II: The Rule-Following Considerations§ 13.1: The Problem of Meaning Scepticism§ 13.2: Algorithms and Dispositions§ 13.3: Kripke’s Interpretation of Wittgenstein: Community Dispositionalism and the ‘Sceptical Solution’§ 13.4: Textual Evidence For and Against Kripke’s Interpretation of Wittgenstein§ 13.5: Normatively-Rich Practices: Sociality§ 13.6: Normatively-Rich Practices: Contextualism and FallibilismChapter Fourteen: Later-Wittgenstein III: The Private Language Argument§ 14.1: The Relation between the Rule-Following Discussion and the Private Language Argument § 14.2: The ‘Independent Check’ Argument§ 14.3: The Independent Check Argument Evaluated: Ayer’s Objection and Kripke’s Footnote 47§ 14.4: The Grammatical Status of Two Statements of Privacy§ 14.5: The Expressive (Not Descriptive) Grammar of Sensation Talk§ 14.6: Wittgenstein and Behaviorism

John Fennell is Associate Professor of Philosophy at Grinnell College in Grinnell, Iowa.

""Fennell’s Critical Introduction to the Philosophy of Language is a fine supplementary text for an undergraduate introduction to the field."--Russell Marcus in Teaching Philosophy"John Fennell weaves crystal clear, careful expositions, and exciting discussions of key figures in the analytic philosophy of language and logic into a sweeping historical narrative, bringing these figures into lively conversation with each other and placing their ideas and concerns into the context of larger developments in modern theoretical philosophy. Highly recommended both as a companion for the student and a refresher and resource for the seasoned practitioner."--Ronald Loeffler, Grand Valley State University

• Introduction: Logico-Semantics, Logical Positivism and their DiscontentsChapter One: The Classical Empiricist Account of Meaning§ 1.1: The Inessentiality of language§ 1.2: The "‘Idea’ Idea"§ 1.3: The Primacy of the Naming Relation§ 1.4: The Linguistic Turn, Anti-Psychologism, and the Primacy of the Sentence§ 1.5: Logical AnalysisChapter Two: Classical Empiricism and the Problem of the A Priori: Mill, Kant, and Frege§ 2.1: Some Background Distinctions: A Priori/A Posteriori, Analytic/Synthetic, Necessary/Contingent§ 2.2: Mill§ 2.3: Kant§ 2.4: Frege§ 2.5: Appendix: Russell’s Set-Theoretic ParadoxChapter Three: Frege’s Begriffsschrift§ 3.1: Logic and its Limitations§ 3.2: Function and Argument§ 3.3: Predicates, Quantifiers and the Solution to the Problem of Multiple Generality§ 3.4: Sentence Connectives and the Solution to the Problem of a Unified Logical Notation§ 3.5: Identity§ 3.6: Appendix: Concordance between Begriffsschrift Notation and the Kalish/Montague/Mar NotationChapter Four: Frege on Sense and Reference§ 4.1: Three Semantic Puzzles for a Reference-Only (Extensionalist) Account of Meaning§ 4.2: The Sense/Reference Distinction§ 4.3: The Problems of Non-Referring Singular Terms and Identity Statements§ 4.4: The Problem of Belief Contexts§ 4.5: Problems with Frege’s Solution§ 4.6: Definite Descriptions and Some Further Consequences of Frege’s Sense/Reference DistinctionChapter Five: Russell’s Theory of Descriptions§ 5.1: Scope and Basic Strategy of the Theory of Descriptions§ 5.2: The Theory Applied to Definite Descriptions, including Non-Referring Definite Descriptions§ 5.3: Four Key Features of Russell’s Analysis of Definite Descriptions§ 5.4: Russell’s Solutions to Some Semantic Puzzles§ 5.5: Russell’s Theory and Excluded Middle§ 5.6: Critical Discussion (I): Strawson§ 5.7: Critical Discussion (II): Donnellan Chapter Six: Kripke’s Causal Theory of Reference§ 6.1: Core Features of Russell’s Theory§ 6.2: Three Key Problems for Russell’s Description Theory§ 6.3: The Cluster Theory and its Analogous Problems§ 6.4: Correct Descriptions are neither Necessary nor Sufficient for Names to Refer§ 6.5: The Causal Theory of Reference-Grounding and Reference-Borrowing§ 6.6: The Causal Theory’s Solution to the Three Problems§ 6.7: Rigid Designation and Necessary A Posteriori Propositions§ 6.8: The Distinction between Fixing the Reference and Giving the Meaning§ 6.9: The Contingency of ‘Hesperus is the evening star’ v. The Necessity of ‘Hesperus is Phosphorus’§ 6.10: Problems for Kripke’s ViewChapter Seven: Logical Positivism I: Ayer§ 7.1: Three Central Doctrines of Logical Positivism§ 7.2: Realist v. Anti-Realist Accounts of Meaning§ 7.3: Versions of the Verification Principle§ 7.4: The Problem of the A Priori (again)§ 7.5: Questions regarding Conventionalism about Necessity and LogicChapter Eight: Logical Positivism II: Carnap§ 8.1: Conventionalism§ 8.2: Linguistic Frameworks§ 8.3: Internal v. External Questions and Formal v. Material Mode§ 8.4: Metaphysics and Tolerance§ 8.5: The Status of PhilosophyChapter Nine: Quine’s Critique of Positivism I: ‘Two Dogmas of Empiricism’§ 9.1: ‘No Entity without Identity’§ 9.2: Two Different Conceptions of Synonymy: Definition and Substitution§ 9.3: Epistemic Holism and the Rejection of Meaning and Synonymy§ 9.4: Epistemic Holism and the Elimination of the Analytic/Synthetic Distinction§ 9.5: Epistemic Holism and the Web of Belief§ 9.6: Epistemic Holism, Fallibilism and the History of ScienceChapter Ten: Quine’s Critique of Positivism II: Anti-Conventionalism§ 10.1: Quine’s Problems with Conventionalism§ 10.2: Quine’s Pragmatic Account of Logic and Necessity§ 10.3: Problems with Quine’s Pragmatization of Logic: Dummett and DavidsonChapter Eleven: Quine: Radical Translation and the Indeterminacy of Meaning§ 11.1: Occasion Sentences, Standing Sentences, Stimulus Meaning, and Stimulus Synonymy§ 11.2: The Argument for Indeterminacy: Holism and Behaviorism§ 11.3: First-Personal and Ontological Indeterminacy v. Third-Personal and Epistemological Under-Determination§ 11.4: The Principle of Charity: Pragmatic or Constitutive§ 11.5: Some Problems with Charity and Logic.Chapter Twelve: Later-Wittgenstein I: Ordinary Language Philosophy and the Critique of Ostension§ 12.1: Ordinary Language Philosophy, Grammatical Investigations and Language Games§ 12.2: The Critique of the Augustinian Picture: The Language Games of the Grocer and the Builders§ 12.3: Wittgenstein’s Critique of Ostensive DefinitionChapter Thirteen: Later-Wittgenstein II: The Rule-Following Considerations§ 13.1: The Problem of Meaning Scepticism§ 13.2: Algorithms and Dispositions§ 13.3: Kripke’s Interpretation of Wittgenstein: Community Dispositionalism and the ‘Sceptical Solution’§ 13.4: Textual Evidence For and Against Kripke’s Interpretation of Wittgenstein§ 13.5: Normatively-Rich Practices: Sociality§ 13.6: Normatively-Rich Practices: Contextualism and FallibilismChapter Fourteen: Later-Wittgenstein III: The Private Language Argument§ 14.1: The Relation between the Rule-Following Discussion and the Private Language Argument § 14.2: The ‘Independent Check’ Argument§ 14.3: The Independent Check Argument Evaluated: Ayer’s Objection and Kripke’s Footnote 47§ 14.4: The Grammatical Status of Two Statements of Privacy§ 14.5: The Expressive (Not Descriptive) Grammar of Sensation Talk§ 14.6: Wittgenstein and Behaviorism

John Fennell is Associate Professor of Philosophy at Grinnell College in Grinnell, Iowa.

""Fennell’s Critical Introduction to the Philosophy of Language is a fine supplementary text for an undergraduate introduction to the field."--Russell Marcus in Teaching Philosophy"John Fennell weaves crystal clear, careful expositions, and exciting discussions of key figures in the analytic philosophy of language and logic into a sweeping historical narrative, bringing these figures into lively conversation with each other and placing their ideas and concerns into the context of larger developments in modern theoretical philosophy. Highly recommended both as a companion for the student and a refresher and resource for the seasoned practitioner."--Ronald Loeffler, Grand Valley State University

• Introduction: Logico-Semantics, Logical Positivism and their DiscontentsChapter One: The Classical Empiricist Account of Meaning§ 1.1: The Inessentiality of language§ 1.2: The "‘Idea’ Idea"§ 1.3: The Primacy of the Naming Relation§ 1.4: The Linguistic Turn, Anti-Psychologism, and the Primacy of the Sentence§ 1.5: Logical AnalysisChapter Two: Classical Empiricism and the Problem of the A Priori: Mill, Kant, and Frege§ 2.1: Some Background Distinctions: A Priori/A Posteriori, Analytic/Synthetic, Necessary/Contingent§ 2.2: Mill§ 2.3: Kant§ 2.4: Frege§ 2.5: Appendix: Russell’s Set-Theoretic ParadoxChapter Three: Frege’s Begriffsschrift§ 3.1: Logic and its Limitations§ 3.2: Function and Argument§ 3.3: Predicates, Quantifiers and the Solution to the Problem of Multiple Generality§ 3.4: Sentence Connectives and the Solution to the Problem of a Unified Logical Notation§ 3.5: Identity§ 3.6: Appendix: Concordance between Begriffsschrift Notation and the Kalish/Montague/Mar NotationChapter Four: Frege on Sense and Reference§ 4.1: Three Semantic Puzzles for a Reference-Only (Extensionalist) Account of Meaning§ 4.2: The Sense/Reference Distinction§ 4.3: The Problems of Non-Referring Singular Terms and Identity Statements§ 4.4: The Problem of Belief Contexts§ 4.5: Problems with Frege’s Solution§ 4.6: Definite Descriptions and Some Further Consequences of Frege’s Sense/Reference DistinctionChapter Five: Russell’s Theory of Descriptions§ 5.1: Scope and Basic Strategy of the Theory of Descriptions§ 5.2: The Theory Applied to Definite Descriptions, including Non-Referring Definite Descriptions§ 5.3: Four Key Features of Russell’s Analysis of Definite Descriptions§ 5.4: Russell’s Solutions to Some Semantic Puzzles§ 5.5: Russell’s Theory and Excluded Middle§ 5.6: Critical Discussion (I): Strawson§ 5.7: Critical Discussion (II): Donnellan Chapter Six: Kripke’s Causal Theory of Reference§ 6.1: Core Features of Russell’s Theory§ 6.2: Three Key Problems for Russell’s Description Theory§ 6.3: The Cluster Theory and its Analogous Problems§ 6.4: Correct Descriptions are neither Necessary nor Sufficient for Names to Refer§ 6.5: The Causal Theory of Reference-Grounding and Reference-Borrowing§ 6.6: The Causal Theory’s Solution to the Three Problems§ 6.7: Rigid Designation and Necessary A Posteriori Propositions§ 6.8: The Distinction between Fixing the Reference and Giving the Meaning§ 6.9: The Contingency of ‘Hesperus is the evening star’ v. The Necessity of ‘Hesperus is Phosphorus’§ 6.10: Problems for Kripke’s ViewChapter Seven: Logical Positivism I: Ayer§ 7.1: Three Central Doctrines of Logical Positivism§ 7.2: Realist v. Anti-Realist Accounts of Meaning§ 7.3: Versions of the Verification Principle§ 7.4: The Problem of the A Priori (again)§ 7.5: Questions regarding Conventionalism about Necessity and LogicChapter Eight: Logical Positivism II: Carnap§ 8.1: Conventionalism§ 8.2: Linguistic Frameworks§ 8.3: Internal v. External Questions and Formal v. Material Mode§ 8.4: Metaphysics and Tolerance§ 8.5: The Status of PhilosophyChapter Nine: Quine’s Critique of Positivism I: ‘Two Dogmas of Empiricism’§ 9.1: ‘No Entity without Identity’§ 9.2: Two Different Conceptions of Synonymy: Definition and Substitution§ 9.3: Epistemic Holism and the Rejection of Meaning and Synonymy§ 9.4: Epistemic Holism and the Elimination of the Analytic/Synthetic Distinction§ 9.5: Epistemic Holism and the Web of Belief§ 9.6: Epistemic Holism, Fallibilism and the History of ScienceChapter Ten: Quine’s Critique of Positivism II: Anti-Conventionalism§ 10.1: Quine’s Problems with Conventionalism§ 10.2: Quine’s Pragmatic Account of Logic and Necessity§ 10.3: Problems with Quine’s Pragmatization of Logic: Dummett and DavidsonChapter Eleven: Quine: Radical Translation and the Indeterminacy of Meaning§ 11.1: Occasion Sentences, Standing Sentences, Stimulus Meaning, and Stimulus Synonymy§ 11.2: The Argument for Indeterminacy: Holism and Behaviorism§ 11.3: First-Personal and Ontological Indeterminacy v. Third-Personal and Epistemological Under-Determination§ 11.4: The Principle of Charity: Pragmatic or Constitutive§ 11.5: Some Problems with Charity and Logic.Chapter Twelve: Later-Wittgenstein I: Ordinary Language Philosophy and the Critique of Ostension§ 12.1: Ordinary Language Philosophy, Grammatical Investigations and Language Games§ 12.2: The Critique of the Augustinian Picture: The Language Games of the Grocer and the Builders§ 12.3: Wittgenstein’s Critique of Ostensive DefinitionChapter Thirteen: Later-Wittgenstein II: The Rule-Following Considerations§ 13.1: The Problem of Meaning Scepticism§ 13.2: Algorithms and Dispositions§ 13.3: Kripke’s Interpretation of Wittgenstein: Community Dispositionalism and the ‘Sceptical Solution’§ 13.4: Textual Evidence For and Against Kripke’s Interpretation of Wittgenstein§ 13.5: Normatively-Rich Practices: Sociality§ 13.6: Normatively-Rich Practices: Contextualism and FallibilismChapter Fourteen: Later-Wittgenstein III: The Private Language Argument§ 14.1: The Relation between the Rule-Following Discussion and the Private Language Argument § 14.2: The ‘Independent Check’ Argument§ 14.3: The Independent Check Argument Evaluated: Ayer’s Objection and Kripke’s Footnote 47§ 14.4: The Grammatical Status of Two Statements of Privacy§ 14.5: The Expressive (Not Descriptive) Grammar of Sensation Talk§ 14.6: Wittgenstein and Behaviorism