Myth and (mis)information

Allan Ingram is Emeritus Professor of English at the University of NorthumbriaClark Lawlor is Professor of Eighteenth-Century Literature at the University of NorthumbriaHelen Williams is Associate Professor of English Literature at the University of Northumbria

'Myth and (Mis)information expand our understanding of what counts as science, who gets to make it,and how it circulates.'SEL Summer 63, 3 Thematic Review‘Studies of the connections between literature and medicine of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries have increased in number over the past few years but rarely do we see such in-depth studies of the lexical and textual mechanics of this intersection. The stimulating essays of Myth and (mis)information remind us that important debates about truth, meaning, and representation go to the heart of the social and global history of medicine and that if we are to understand the present, we must first take an interdisciplinary, collaborative approach to the languages of the past.’—Professor Andrew Mangham, University of Reading‘Myth and (mis)information is a must read for anyone in search of new insights into the modern medical marketplace, the circulation of knowledge, reader-reception of medical texts, and the shaping of medical culture. In a post-COVID era, it skilfully historicises the current anxieties we have about health misinformation. The book encompasses multiple aspects of medical writings within a cultural and historical perspective: women publishers, herbalists and healers, overlooked texts by medical celebrities, dog doctors, illness narratives of poxed men, medical branding and advertising, medical controversies on epidemics, vaccination or anatomy. A rattling good read!’—Professor Sophie Vasset, Institut de Recherches sur la Renaissance, l'Âge Classique et les Lumières (IRCL), Université de Montpellier Paul-Valéry

• Introduction – Clark Lawlor and Helen Williams 1. “To level those monstrous Blotches or Pustules”: Skincare in De Morbis Cutaneis (1714) – Katherine Aske 2. Dr John Arbuthnot’s Literary Treatment for False Learning, Pedantry, and Excess: from Physic to Metaphysics – John Baker 3. “The very women read it”: Medical Self-Fashioning, Mythologies and (Mis)Information in George Cheyne M.D.’s Medical Writings – Clark Lawlor 4. Studying in Solitude: Demythologising the Masculine Medical Monopoly with Jane Barker’s Galesia and Tobias Smollett’s Sagely – Laurence Sullivan 5. “Take physic, Pomp”: Imagining Dog Doctors in Eighteenth-Century Britain – Stephanie Howard-Smith 6. “A man of common understanding”: Venereal Disease, Myth, and Reading as a Protective Practice in Eighteenth-Century Britain – Declan Kavanagh 7. Sir Anthony Carlisle’s Gothic (Medical) Intervention: Carving the Criminal Body in The Horrors of Oakendale Abbey – Bethany Brigham 8. Mislabelling and the Medical Printer-Publisher: Demystifying the Ephemera of Elizabeth Rane Cox (1765-1841) – Helen Williams 9. The Uneasy Relationship between Traditional and Orthodox Medicine in the Works of Elizabeth Gaskell – Barbara Witucki 10. Medical Men Recommend Them: Branded Medicines and the Myth of the Medical Moral Economy c. 1876-1880 – Laura Robson-Mainwaring 11. Dissecting Venus: Popular Consumption of Flap Anatomies, 1890–1910 – Jessica Dandona 12. “You taught us that which you knew not to be the truth”: The Anti-Vaccination Medical Doctor in Henry Rider Haggard’s Doctor Therne (1898) – Carlotta Fiammenghi Afterword – Allan IngramIndex