Kristen Rundle is a Lecturer in Law at the London School of Economics.

There is much of interest in this book for any legal philosopher. It is good to see the various elements of Fuller's work brought together as a larger interconnected project; and the interweaving of published and unpublished materials is a useful aid to deeper appreciation and understanding.

• 1 Reclaiming Fuller I Form and Agency II What is Being 'Reclaimed'? III About the Book: Method, Material and StructureIV Outline of the Chapters 2 Before the Debate I The Early Fuller: Positivism and Natural Law at Mid-century II Eunomics: A 'Science or Theory of Good Order and Workable Social Arrangements' III Navigating the Labels IV Conclusion 3 The 1958 Debate I Mapping the Debate II Reclaiming Fuller through the Nazi Law Debate III Fuller and Legal Validity IV Conclusion4 The Morality of Law I Mapping The Morality of Law II Hart's Review of The Morality of Law III A Different Path? IV Conclusion 5 The Reply to Critics I Mapping the 'Reply to Critics' II Generality, Efficacy and Agency: Insights from the Archive III Reflections on the 'Reply to Critics' IV Conclusion 6 Resituating Fuller I: Raz I Fuller and Raz II Raz on the Rule of Law III Raz on Authority IV Conclusion: Form, Agency and Authority 7 Resituating Fuller II: Dworkin I Fuller and Dworkin II The 1965 Essays III Dworkin's Project IV Fuller, Dworkin and Interpretation V Fuller, Dworkin and Methodology VI Fuller, Dworkin and the Value of Legality VII Conclusion: Taking Form Seriously 8 Three Conversations I Morality II Instrumentalism III Legality Fuller and Shapiro: A New Conversation? IV Conclusion

Kristen Rundle is a Lecturer in Law at the London School of Economics.

There is much of interest in this book for any legal philosopher. It is good to see the various elements of Fuller's work brought together as a larger interconnected project; and the interweaving of published and unpublished materials is a useful aid to deeper appreciation and understanding.

• 1 Reclaiming Fuller I Form and Agency II What is Being 'Reclaimed'? III About the Book: Method, Material and StructureIV Outline of the Chapters 2 Before the Debate I The Early Fuller: Positivism and Natural Law at Mid-century II Eunomics: A 'Science or Theory of Good Order and Workable Social Arrangements' III Navigating the Labels IV Conclusion 3 The 1958 Debate I Mapping the Debate II Reclaiming Fuller through the Nazi Law Debate III Fuller and Legal Validity IV Conclusion4 The Morality of Law I Mapping The Morality of Law II Hart's Review of The Morality of Law III A Different Path? IV Conclusion 5 The Reply to Critics I Mapping the 'Reply to Critics' II Generality, Efficacy and Agency: Insights from the Archive III Reflections on the 'Reply to Critics' IV Conclusion 6 Resituating Fuller I: Raz I Fuller and Raz II Raz on the Rule of Law III Raz on Authority IV Conclusion: Form, Agency and Authority 7 Resituating Fuller II: Dworkin I Fuller and Dworkin II The 1965 Essays III Dworkin's Project IV Fuller, Dworkin and Interpretation V Fuller, Dworkin and Methodology VI Fuller, Dworkin and the Value of Legality VII Conclusion: Taking Form Seriously 8 Three Conversations I Morality II Instrumentalism III Legality Fuller and Shapiro: A New Conversation? IV Conclusion

Kristen Rundle is a Lecturer in Law at the London School of Economics.

There is much of interest in this book for any legal philosopher. It is good to see the various elements of Fuller's work brought together as a larger interconnected project; and the interweaving of published and unpublished materials is a useful aid to deeper appreciation and understanding.

• 1 Reclaiming Fuller I Form and Agency II What is Being 'Reclaimed'? III About the Book: Method, Material and StructureIV Outline of the Chapters 2 Before the Debate I The Early Fuller: Positivism and Natural Law at Mid-century II Eunomics: A 'Science or Theory of Good Order and Workable Social Arrangements' III Navigating the Labels IV Conclusion 3 The 1958 Debate I Mapping the Debate II Reclaiming Fuller through the Nazi Law Debate III Fuller and Legal Validity IV Conclusion4 The Morality of Law I Mapping The Morality of Law II Hart's Review of The Morality of Law III A Different Path? IV Conclusion 5 The Reply to Critics I Mapping the 'Reply to Critics' II Generality, Efficacy and Agency: Insights from the Archive III Reflections on the 'Reply to Critics' IV Conclusion 6 Resituating Fuller I: Raz I Fuller and Raz II Raz on the Rule of Law III Raz on Authority IV Conclusion: Form, Agency and Authority 7 Resituating Fuller II: Dworkin I Fuller and Dworkin II The 1965 Essays III Dworkin's Project IV Fuller, Dworkin and Interpretation V Fuller, Dworkin and Methodology VI Fuller, Dworkin and the Value of Legality VII Conclusion: Taking Form Seriously 8 Three Conversations I Morality II Instrumentalism III Legality Fuller and Shapiro: A New Conversation? IV Conclusion