Seminar paper from the year 2002 in the subject English Language and Literature Studies - Linguistics, grade: 2,3 (B), University of Bayreuth (English Linguistics), course: Speech acts and conversational principles, language: English, abstract: Every conversation is different from all others. Nobody ever had exactly the same private conversationagain, even if he conversed about the same topic. Nevertheless there are certainitems in conversations that are very alike or completely alike, and which seem to be build oncertain schemes. Places in conversations where these schemes occur are openings and closings. The aim of this paper is to examine the mechanisms behind this phenomenon and to examine ifand how these mechanisms have changed since they were first examined by Schegloff andother linguists in the 1970 s. For providing the necessary background information, I will firstgive some basic features of conversation analysis which are important for the topic, beforemoving on to conversation openings and finally to conversation closings. In openings I will especially focus on the summons-answer structure, identification and recognitionas well as on the changes that had to be made and were made to the structure sincethe establishment of number identification. Closings will be examined by their components andthe different possibilities they provide will be analysed. As stated by Levinson (1983: 309) telephone conversation is one of social activities effectivelyconstituted by talk itself . This is, that the conversation is not disturbed in its pureness byextra-linguistic features like physical doings and positionings (Schegloff 1973: 323). Participatinghearers have to interpret the utterances with nothing more than voice, words, intonationand pauses which can be analysed linguistically. Also the beginnings and endings and becauseof that also the opening and closing places - of such conversation can clearly be determined,as telephone conversation usually has a duration of the time of the call. Therefore telephoneconversation is most suitable for linguistic research and I will focus on such conversationonly (Schegloff 1973: 325).
