M. Levy-Bruhl then explains that, whilst recognising the entire coherence of Comte's collective labours, he proposes to confine his present study to the earlier and principal work, the Philosophy, which in M. Levy-Bruhl's opinion is the dominant and more fruitful composition. This he regards as the representative work of the nineteenth century, as shown by the intellectual history of the period. He points to its influence on thought in England, in Europe, and in America. It will surprise many persons to learn that in M. Levy-Bruhl's opinion two eminent French writers, who assuredly neither were, nor were supposed to be, Positivists, "e;have done more for the diffusion of the ideas and method of Comte than Littre and all the other Positivists together."e;These two are Taine and Renan, much as they differed from Comte's actual scheme and doctrines. Renan indeed spoke of Comte as destined to prove one of the typical names of the century. The present writer remembers Renan saying to him with a most genial welcome, "e;I too am a believer in the religion of humanity."e;
