Internationale Sicherheit – serie

Die Arbeit beschäftigt sich mit der Veränderung des Konfliktmanagements in den neunziger Jahren. In dieser Zeit rückten neue Ansätze in den Vordergrund, wie das Modell der Wahrheitskommission und der Aspekt der «reconciliation» (Versöhnung). Anhand dieser neuen Konzepte erfolgt eine Analyse des Israelisch-Palästinensischen Friedensprozesses von Oslo dahingehend, ob das Scheitern der mangelhaften Versöhnungsarbeit zuzurechnen ist. Neben der empirischen Arbeit wurde Kontakt mit den Beteiligten von Oslo und des Israelisch-Palästinensischen Konfliktes aufgenommen, um die Meinung der Betroffenen in Erfahrung zu bringen. Das Ergebnis der Arbeit zeigt, daß die neuen Erkenntnisse des Konfliktmanagements in und nach Oslo kaum Eingang in die Konfliktarbeit gefunden haben.

This book investigates issues pertaining to the US and EU agendas in Africa since the dawn of the new century. It discusses how the African continent has featured within the US and EU foreign policy agendas, by looking at ensuing gaps between a rhetoric that claimed to have put Africa within the high politics agenda and the reality. The case studies analyse the reasons for the very different acknowledgements of USAFRICOM and JAES P&S, even though both policies state to aim the same: support Africa in tackling its own security concerns. The book concludes with a deliberation on which of the two outlooks seems to offer an appropriate approach to the context and which offers pragmatic solutions.

Greece and Turkey have found themselves on the brink of war on several occasions over the last 50 years irrespective of the fact that both have been members to NATO since 1952. This book sets out to explore the effects this co-membership of Greece and Turkey in NATO has had on the course of their bilateral conflict while paying attention to the related theoretical debate and portraying the arguments of neorealists and neoliberal institutionalists. A further object of research is the impact of NATO membership on the democratic development of these countries. Overall, the conclusion is drawn that NATO has not played a prominent role in this conflict, and the effects of membership have been ambivalent. Moreover, NATO membership neither seems to have played a major role in shaping the fate of democratization in these countries. Nevertheless, the assertion is made that these findings do not contradict institutionalist argumentation, since the effects of institutions are expected to vary in different settings.