Thank you to the following reviewers: Darek NiklasRhode Island CollegeDavid FordUniversity of Central OklahomaPaul GrayBoston CollegeChristopher Hunter Grinnell College "I particularly like the ideas of splitting chapters up, to permit easier creation of reading assignments; of including adding group process approaches; of eliminating some of the less-used theories (e.g., Dahrendorf); and of retaining the style of writing. -Christopher Hunter, Grinnell College "I think the prospectus covers anything I could think of. Another thing I like is the proposal to separate the material into more digestible chunks.' Anything that makes the material more accessible and aids in the student's understanding would be a plus." -David Ford of University of Central Oklahoma "I like the text as is, but the revisions seem appropriate." -Paul Gray, Boston College

Thank you to the following reviewers: Darek NiklasRhode Island CollegeDavid FordUniversity of Central OklahomaPaul GrayBoston CollegeChristopher Hunter Grinnell College "I particularly like the ideas of splitting chapters up, to permit easier creation of reading assignments; of including adding group process approaches; of eliminating some of the less-used theories (e.g., Dahrendorf); and of retaining the style of writing. -Christopher Hunter, Grinnell College "I think the prospectus covers anything I could think of. Another thing I like is the proposal to separate the material into more digestible chunks.' Anything that makes the material more accessible and aids in the student's understanding would be a plus." -David Ford of University of Central Oklahoma "I like the text as is, but the revisions seem appropriate." -Paul Gray, Boston College

Thank you to the following reviewers: Darek NiklasRhode Island CollegeDavid FordUniversity of Central OklahomaPaul GrayBoston CollegeChristopher Hunter Grinnell College "I particularly like the ideas of splitting chapters up, to permit easier creation of reading assignments; of including adding group process approaches; of eliminating some of the less-used theories (e.g., Dahrendorf); and of retaining the style of writing. -Christopher Hunter, Grinnell College "I think the prospectus covers anything I could think of. Another thing I like is the proposal to separate the material into more digestible chunks.' Anything that makes the material more accessible and aids in the student's understanding would be a plus." -David Ford of University of Central Oklahoma "I like the text as is, but the revisions seem appropriate." -Paul Gray, Boston College