Elizabeth Potter is the Alice Andrews Quigley Professor ofWomen's Studies at Mills College. She is co-editor of Feminist Epistemologies and author of numerous articles in feminist epistemology and feminist philosophy of science.

"Gender and Boyle's Law of Gases is about more than its title implies: not only does Potter (Mills College) engage in the continuing dialogue about if and how gender might affect the practice of science, but she also goes beyond gender and enters the contemporary discussion about the social dimension of science. Accordingly, most of the book is devoted to a review of the history of the English Civil War and Revolution, the radical social and political groups that were active at that time (Levellers, sectaries), and to a discussion of the religious and social meaning of hylozoism (an early Greek philosophy that states that all matter has life) in the 17th century. Potter argues for a compromise position between those who would insist that Boyle's science was derived entirely from experimental and observational evidence, and those who believe that his ideas about gender and his total rejection of hylozoism (because of its radical political implications) influenced the science that led to the Gas Law. Her argument is that although Boyle's work is not free of contextual values, he produced good science and hence good science can be value-laden. Of interest to feminist and social philosophers of science, historians, and sociologists of science. No bibliography. Upper-division undergraduates through faculty.January 2002"—M. H. Chaplin, Wellesley College"[P]olitics, society, philosophy, religion, science and gender all influenced Boyle in his scientific how (his choice of experiments) and why (the way he interpreted his results)—and yet, ironically, enduring science was done."—American Scientist

• ContentsIntroductionPart I: The Intersection of Gender and Science: Now We See It. Now We Don't.1. Now We See It2. Now We Don'tPart II: Boyle's Work in Context1. Economics, Politics and Religion: Stuart Conflicts With Parliament2. Civil War Approaches3. The Intersection of Class and Gender Politics4. The Boyle Family's Religious and Class Politics5. More Class and Gender Politics6. Boyle's Gender Politics7. Boyle's Background Reading8. Boyle's Hermeticism, Magic and Active Principles9. Hermeticism, Hylozooism and Radical Politics10. Boyle's Concern Over the Sectaries11. Boyle's Objections to Hylozooism12. Experimental Support for the Corpuscular Philosophy13. Boyle's Law of Gases14. The Production of An Alternative Law15. Methodological Considerations16. "The Data Alone Proved Boyle's Hypothesis"17. Good ScienceConclusion

Elizabeth Potter is the Alice Andrews Quigley Professor ofWomen's Studies at Mills College. She is co-editor of Feminist Epistemologies and author of numerous articles in feminist epistemology and feminist philosophy of science.

"Gender and Boyle's Law of Gases is about more than its title implies: not only does Potter (Mills College) engage in the continuing dialogue about if and how gender might affect the practice of science, but she also goes beyond gender and enters the contemporary discussion about the social dimension of science. Accordingly, most of the book is devoted to a review of the history of the English Civil War and Revolution, the radical social and political groups that were active at that time (Levellers, sectaries), and to a discussion of the religious and social meaning of hylozoism (an early Greek philosophy that states that all matter has life) in the 17th century. Potter argues for a compromise position between those who would insist that Boyle's science was derived entirely from experimental and observational evidence, and those who believe that his ideas about gender and his total rejection of hylozoism (because of its radical political implications) influenced the science that led to the Gas Law. Her argument is that although Boyle's work is not free of contextual values, he produced good science and hence good science can be value-laden. Of interest to feminist and social philosophers of science, historians, and sociologists of science. No bibliography. Upper-division undergraduates through faculty.January 2002"—M. H. Chaplin, Wellesley College"[P]olitics, society, philosophy, religion, science and gender all influenced Boyle in his scientific how (his choice of experiments) and why (the way he interpreted his results)—and yet, ironically, enduring science was done."—American Scientist

• ContentsIntroductionPart I: The Intersection of Gender and Science: Now We See It. Now We Don't.1. Now We See It2. Now We Don'tPart II: Boyle's Work in Context1. Economics, Politics and Religion: Stuart Conflicts With Parliament2. Civil War Approaches3. The Intersection of Class and Gender Politics4. The Boyle Family's Religious and Class Politics5. More Class and Gender Politics6. Boyle's Gender Politics7. Boyle's Background Reading8. Boyle's Hermeticism, Magic and Active Principles9. Hermeticism, Hylozooism and Radical Politics10. Boyle's Concern Over the Sectaries11. Boyle's Objections to Hylozooism12. Experimental Support for the Corpuscular Philosophy13. Boyle's Law of Gases14. The Production of An Alternative Law15. Methodological Considerations16. "The Data Alone Proved Boyle's Hypothesis"17. Good ScienceConclusion

Elizabeth Potter is the Alice Andrews Quigley Professor ofWomen's Studies at Mills College. She is co-editor of Feminist Epistemologies and author of numerous articles in feminist epistemology and feminist philosophy of science.

"Gender and Boyle's Law of Gases is about more than its title implies: not only does Potter (Mills College) engage in the continuing dialogue about if and how gender might affect the practice of science, but she also goes beyond gender and enters the contemporary discussion about the social dimension of science. Accordingly, most of the book is devoted to a review of the history of the English Civil War and Revolution, the radical social and political groups that were active at that time (Levellers, sectaries), and to a discussion of the religious and social meaning of hylozoism (an early Greek philosophy that states that all matter has life) in the 17th century. Potter argues for a compromise position between those who would insist that Boyle's science was derived entirely from experimental and observational evidence, and those who believe that his ideas about gender and his total rejection of hylozoism (because of its radical political implications) influenced the science that led to the Gas Law. Her argument is that although Boyle's work is not free of contextual values, he produced good science and hence good science can be value-laden. Of interest to feminist and social philosophers of science, historians, and sociologists of science. No bibliography. Upper-division undergraduates through faculty.January 2002"—M. H. Chaplin, Wellesley College"[P]olitics, society, philosophy, religion, science and gender all influenced Boyle in his scientific how (his choice of experiments) and why (the way he interpreted his results)—and yet, ironically, enduring science was done."—American Scientist

• ContentsIntroductionPart I: The Intersection of Gender and Science: Now We See It. Now We Don't.1. Now We See It2. Now We Don'tPart II: Boyle's Work in Context1. Economics, Politics and Religion: Stuart Conflicts With Parliament2. Civil War Approaches3. The Intersection of Class and Gender Politics4. The Boyle Family's Religious and Class Politics5. More Class and Gender Politics6. Boyle's Gender Politics7. Boyle's Background Reading8. Boyle's Hermeticism, Magic and Active Principles9. Hermeticism, Hylozooism and Radical Politics10. Boyle's Concern Over the Sectaries11. Boyle's Objections to Hylozooism12. Experimental Support for the Corpuscular Philosophy13. Boyle's Law of Gases14. The Production of An Alternative Law15. Methodological Considerations16. "The Data Alone Proved Boyle's Hypothesis"17. Good ScienceConclusion