"Anthropologist Luehrmann (Simon Fraser Univ., Canada) has written an erudite, interesting book on the interaction between religion and secularism in the Soviet Union. Basing her study upon archival documents and atheist propaganda of the 1960s and 1970s as well as ethnographic fieldwork in the autonomous Republic of Marij El in the Volga region, she shows that Communist policies damaged and changed religion and interreligious relationships in lasting ways; that religious persistence impacted atheist efforts to remove religion from society; that the antireligious orientation of the secular state sometimes produced values that favored pedantic and self-actualization attitudes; and, paradoxically, that religious and atheist leaders had many affinities, including a shared hope of improving society. This is a fascinating probe into the complex world of a country attempting to remove religion and god from society in order to modernize, but finding that atheism is not synonymous with modernization, and that religion has deep roots and an extraordinary ability to adapt to changing circumstances. Useful bibliography and index. Summing Up: Recommended. Faculty/specialists. —Choice"—D. J. Dunn, Texas State University—San Marcos"Highly recommend[ed]."—H-Soz-u-Kult"Well conceived from start to finish and likely to become a benchmark in its field. . . . This deeply thoughtful book should appeal to a wide range of readers."—Bruce Grant, New York University"Drawing upon the material on a particular Russian region, the Republic of Marii El (the former Mariiskaia Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic), from the late nineteenth to the early twenty-first century, the author traces the intricate relationship of religion and secularism in Soviet and post-Soviet times.49.1 2015"—Canadian-American Slavic Studies"[Sony Lûrman's] objective of the study is to compare methods to promote atheist and religious ideas in the Soviet and post-Soviet periods, respectively. Although the content of the teaching of religion [is] the opposite of atheistic propaganda, according to the author, there are similarities in terms of audience and methods . . . .1 2014"—Laboratorium"[This book] greatly enhances our understanding of the post-Soviet revival of religion.June 2013"—REVIEW OF POLITICS"Each chapter traces a concept, an 'elective affinity,' through rich descriptions of how that concept is instantiated in practice across time and across a multireligious social field. The result is new and productive lens through which to understand the relationship between religion and communism."—Anthropos"Highly recommend[ed].April 2014"—H-Soz-u-Kult"Secularism Soviet Style is an attractively written and thought-provoking book that deserves to be read not only by regional specialists but by scholars of religion and secularism more generally."—Slavic Review"Luerhmann's ethnography makes an important contribution to studies about the nature of and the relationships between secular and religious movements in Russia. At the same time, its impact will extend beyond studies of religion to shed critical light on processes of knowledge formation and knowledge transmission. In many ways, because Luerhmann does such a good job of attending to and unpacking Russian styles of persuasion, it will be of tremendous value to schlars working on a wide range of topics, from political ideology to forms of aesthetics and representation to institutions and bureaucracies, not just in Russia but across the former Soviet Union."—The Russian Review"Luehrmann's book is well written and excellently researched. It provides much-needed understanding of the late-Soviet atheist endeavors. Importantly, by showing how Soviet secularism diverged from liberal projects, it makes a valuable contribution to conceptualizations of secularism."—PoLAR"Luehrmann's book is a fascinating anthropological inquiry into the every-day lives of post-communist citizens that focuses especially on four religious groups: Orthodox,Protestant-Lutherans, Evangelical (especially Pentecostal and Charismatic) and Traditional Mari Religion (Chimarij) and the way these religious groups appropriate the secular mobilization and didactic techniques that were forged during the Soviet period."—Anthropology of East Europe Review"This is a fascinating probe into the complex world of a country attempting to remove religion and god from society in order to modernize, but finding that atheism is not synonymous with modernization, and that religion has deep roots and an extraordinary ability to adapt to changing circumstances. . . . Recommended."—Choice
