Dr Sam Salek, Reader in Pharmacoepidemiology, Director - WSP Centre for Socioeconomic Research; Director - Postgraduate Course in Pharmaceutical Medicine, Cardiff University, UK. Mr Filip Mussen, Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceuticals Research and Development, Belgium. Prof Stuart Walker, President and Founder, International Institute for Regulatory Science, UK.

• Foreword. Preface.1 Concept and Scope of Benefit–Risk Evaluation of Medicines.1.1 Historical backgroun.1.2 The regulatory systems for assessing medicines.1.3 Benefit–risk assessment: definitions.1.4 Views and perceptions of benefits and risks of medicines.1.5 Stages and concepts in benefit–risk assessment.1.6 Benefit–risk assessment: the current regulatory environment.1.7 Benefit–risk assessment in other disciplines.1.8 Specific methods and models for benefit–risk assessment.1.9 Discussions with stakeholders on the concepts and models for benefit–risk evaluation.2 Criteria for a Benefit–Risk Model: a Conceptual Framework.2.1 Introduction.2.2 Regulatory guidelines on benefit and risk criteria.2.3 Identification, definition and rationale of relevant benefit and risk criteria.2.4 Verification of the list of benefit and risk criteria by means of a survey.3 Review of the Current Benefit–Risk Assessment Models.3.1 Background.3.2 Evaluation of the existing benefit–risk assessment models.3.3 Review of models in single clinical trials and for specific medicines.3.4 Conclusion.3.5 Newer models.4 Defining a Systematic Approach to Decision Making.4.1 Introduction.4.2 Objectives and features of the ideal model for benefit–risk assessment.4.3 The use of decision-analysis techniques for the development of the new model.5 Development and Application of a Benefit–Risk Assessment Model Based on Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis.5.1 Introduction.5.2 Conceptualization of the new model.5.3 Reasons for using decision analysis techniques in the new model.5.4 The use of MCDA in the new model.5.5 Development of the new model.5.6 Applicability of the new model.5.7 Summary.5.8 Review of the MCDA model.6 A Future Framework for Benefit–Risk Appraisal of Medicines.6.1 Background.6.2 Development of a benefit–risk framework for regulatory review of new medicines.6.3 Prerequisites of a benefit–risk framework for the registration of a new medicine.6.4 Current status of benefit–risk assessment among companies and agencies.6.5 Constructing a benefit–risk framework.6.6 Conclusion.Appendices.Appendix 1 Summary Reports of the CMR International Institute for Regulatory Science March 2004 and June 2005 Workshops on Benefit–Risk.Appendix 2 Office of Health Economics Briefing: Challenges and Opportunities for Improving Benefit–risk Assessment of Pharmaceuticals from an Economic Perspective – James Cross and Louis Garrison (August 2008).Appendix 3 Reflection Paper on Benefit–risk Assessment Methods in the Context of the Evaluation of Marketing Authorisation Applications of Medicinal Products for Human Use – Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (March 2008).Appendix 4 Commentaries on ‘A Quantitative Approach to Benefit–risk Assessment of Medicines’ Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 2007, 16.Appendix 5 Forum on Benefit: Risk Decision Analysis – Summary of  Discussions and Recommendations – MHRA (September 2008).References.Index.

Dr Sam Salek, Reader in Pharmacoepidemiology, Director - WSP Centre for Socioeconomic Research; Director - Postgraduate Course in Pharmaceutical Medicine, Cardiff University, UK. Mr Filip Mussen, Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceuticals Research and Development, Belgium. Prof Stuart Walker, President and Founder, International Institute for Regulatory Science, UK.

• Foreword. Preface.1 Concept and Scope of Benefit–Risk Evaluation of Medicines.1.1 Historical backgroun.1.2 The regulatory systems for assessing medicines.1.3 Benefit–risk assessment: definitions.1.4 Views and perceptions of benefits and risks of medicines.1.5 Stages and concepts in benefit–risk assessment.1.6 Benefit–risk assessment: the current regulatory environment.1.7 Benefit–risk assessment in other disciplines.1.8 Specific methods and models for benefit–risk assessment.1.9 Discussions with stakeholders on the concepts and models for benefit–risk evaluation.2 Criteria for a Benefit–Risk Model: a Conceptual Framework.2.1 Introduction.2.2 Regulatory guidelines on benefit and risk criteria.2.3 Identification, definition and rationale of relevant benefit and risk criteria.2.4 Verification of the list of benefit and risk criteria by means of a survey.3 Review of the Current Benefit–Risk Assessment Models.3.1 Background.3.2 Evaluation of the existing benefit–risk assessment models.3.3 Review of models in single clinical trials and for specific medicines.3.4 Conclusion.3.5 Newer models.4 Defining a Systematic Approach to Decision Making.4.1 Introduction.4.2 Objectives and features of the ideal model for benefit–risk assessment.4.3 The use of decision-analysis techniques for the development of the new model.5 Development and Application of a Benefit–Risk Assessment Model Based on Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis.5.1 Introduction.5.2 Conceptualization of the new model.5.3 Reasons for using decision analysis techniques in the new model.5.4 The use of MCDA in the new model.5.5 Development of the new model.5.6 Applicability of the new model.5.7 Summary.5.8 Review of the MCDA model.6 A Future Framework for Benefit–Risk Appraisal of Medicines.6.1 Background.6.2 Development of a benefit–risk framework for regulatory review of new medicines.6.3 Prerequisites of a benefit–risk framework for the registration of a new medicine.6.4 Current status of benefit–risk assessment among companies and agencies.6.5 Constructing a benefit–risk framework.6.6 Conclusion.Appendices.Appendix 1 Summary Reports of the CMR International Institute for Regulatory Science March 2004 and June 2005 Workshops on Benefit–Risk.Appendix 2 Office of Health Economics Briefing: Challenges and Opportunities for Improving Benefit–risk Assessment of Pharmaceuticals from an Economic Perspective – James Cross and Louis Garrison (August 2008).Appendix 3 Reflection Paper on Benefit–risk Assessment Methods in the Context of the Evaluation of Marketing Authorisation Applications of Medicinal Products for Human Use – Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (March 2008).Appendix 4 Commentaries on ‘A Quantitative Approach to Benefit–risk Assessment of Medicines’ Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 2007, 16.Appendix 5 Forum on Benefit: Risk Decision Analysis – Summary of  Discussions and Recommendations – MHRA (September 2008).References.Index.

Dr Sam Salek, Reader in Pharmacoepidemiology, Director - WSP Centre for Socioeconomic Research; Director - Postgraduate Course in Pharmaceutical Medicine, Cardiff University, UK. Mr Filip Mussen, Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceuticals Research and Development, Belgium. Prof Stuart Walker, President and Founder, International Institute for Regulatory Science, UK.

• Foreword. Preface.1 Concept and Scope of Benefit–Risk Evaluation of Medicines.1.1 Historical backgroun.1.2 The regulatory systems for assessing medicines.1.3 Benefit–risk assessment: definitions.1.4 Views and perceptions of benefits and risks of medicines.1.5 Stages and concepts in benefit–risk assessment.1.6 Benefit–risk assessment: the current regulatory environment.1.7 Benefit–risk assessment in other disciplines.1.8 Specific methods and models for benefit–risk assessment.1.9 Discussions with stakeholders on the concepts and models for benefit–risk evaluation.2 Criteria for a Benefit–Risk Model: a Conceptual Framework.2.1 Introduction.2.2 Regulatory guidelines on benefit and risk criteria.2.3 Identification, definition and rationale of relevant benefit and risk criteria.2.4 Verification of the list of benefit and risk criteria by means of a survey.3 Review of the Current Benefit–Risk Assessment Models.3.1 Background.3.2 Evaluation of the existing benefit–risk assessment models.3.3 Review of models in single clinical trials and for specific medicines.3.4 Conclusion.3.5 Newer models.4 Defining a Systematic Approach to Decision Making.4.1 Introduction.4.2 Objectives and features of the ideal model for benefit–risk assessment.4.3 The use of decision-analysis techniques for the development of the new model.5 Development and Application of a Benefit–Risk Assessment Model Based on Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis.5.1 Introduction.5.2 Conceptualization of the new model.5.3 Reasons for using decision analysis techniques in the new model.5.4 The use of MCDA in the new model.5.5 Development of the new model.5.6 Applicability of the new model.5.7 Summary.5.8 Review of the MCDA model.6 A Future Framework for Benefit–Risk Appraisal of Medicines.6.1 Background.6.2 Development of a benefit–risk framework for regulatory review of new medicines.6.3 Prerequisites of a benefit–risk framework for the registration of a new medicine.6.4 Current status of benefit–risk assessment among companies and agencies.6.5 Constructing a benefit–risk framework.6.6 Conclusion.Appendices.Appendix 1 Summary Reports of the CMR International Institute for Regulatory Science March 2004 and June 2005 Workshops on Benefit–Risk.Appendix 2 Office of Health Economics Briefing: Challenges and Opportunities for Improving Benefit–risk Assessment of Pharmaceuticals from an Economic Perspective – James Cross and Louis Garrison (August 2008).Appendix 3 Reflection Paper on Benefit–risk Assessment Methods in the Context of the Evaluation of Marketing Authorisation Applications of Medicinal Products for Human Use – Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (March 2008).Appendix 4 Commentaries on ‘A Quantitative Approach to Benefit–risk Assessment of Medicines’ Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 2007, 16.Appendix 5 Forum on Benefit: Risk Decision Analysis – Summary of  Discussions and Recommendations – MHRA (September 2008).References.Index.