International Law Reports: Volume 157

Elihu Lauterpacht is an Honorary Professor of International Law, University of Cambridge, and a Bencher of Gray's Inn. Christopher J. Greenwood is a Professor of International Law, London School of Economics and Political Science, and a Bencher of the Middle Temple. Karen Lee is a Fellow of the Lauterpacht Research Centre for International Law, University of Cambridge, and a Fellow of Girton College, Cambridge.

• 1. Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia/Serbia and Montenegro v. Belgium) (Provisional Measures) (Preliminary Objections) [INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE]; 2. Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia/Serbia and Montenegro v. Canada) (Provisional Measures) (Preliminary Objections) (NOTE) [INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE]; 3. Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia/Serbia and Montenegro v. France) (Provisional Measures) (Preliminary Objections) (NOTE) [INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE]; 4. Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia/Serbia and Montenegro v. Germany) (Provisional Measures) (Preliminary Objections) (NOTE) [INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE]; 5. Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia/Serbia and Montenegro v. Italy) (Provisional Measures) (Preliminary Objections) (NOTE) [INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE]; 6. Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia/Serbia and Montenegro v. Netherlands) (Provisional Measures) (Preliminary Objections) (NOTE) [INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE]; 7. Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia/Serbia and Montenegro v. Portugal) (Provisional Measures) (Preliminary Objections) (NOTE) [INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE]; 8. Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia/Serbia and Montenegro v. Spain) (Provisional Measures) (NOTE) [INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE]; 9. Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia/Serbia and Montenegro v. United Kingdom) (Provisional Measures) (Preliminary Objections) (NOTE) [INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE]; 10. Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia/Serbia and Montenegro v. United States of America) (Provisional Measures) (NOTE) [INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE]; 11. Indus Waters Kishenganga Arbitration (Islamic Republic of Pakistan v. Republic of India) (Final Award) [COURT OF ARBITRATION]; (see 150 ILR 311 and 154 ILR 1 for previous stages of case); 12. Indus Waters Kishenganga Arbitration (Islamic Republic of Pakistan v. Republic of India) (Decision on India's Request for Clarification or Interpretation dated 20 May 2013) [COURT OF ARBITRATION]; (see 150 ILR 311 and 154 ILR 1 for previous stages of case); 13. M/V Louisa (Saint Vincent and the Grenadines v. Kingdom of Spain) (Merits) [INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE LAW OF THE SEA]; (provisional measures published in 148 ILR 459); 14. General Comment No 22 on the Right to Freedom of Thought, Conscience and Religion (Article 18) [UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE]; 15. Yoon and Choi v. Korea (Communication Nos 1321/2004 and 1322/2004) [UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE]; 16. Jeong and Others v. Korea (Communication Nos 1642-1741/2007) [UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE]; 17. Atasoy and Sarkut v. Turkey (Communication Nos 1853/2008 and 1854/2008) [UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE] ; 18. Kim and Others v. Korea (Communication No 1786/2008) [UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE]; 19. Attorney General of Canada on behalf of United States of America v. Khadr Court of Appeal for Ontario (2011 ONCA 358) [CANADA]; 20. Re: Aerial Drone Deployment on 4 October 2010 in Mir Ali, Pakistan (Case No 3 BJs 7/12-4) (Targeted Killing in Pakistan Case) (Federal Prosecutor General) [GERMANY]; Decision to Terminate Proceedings.