Ron Levy is an Associate Professor at the Law School, Australian National University, Canberra. Hoi Kong is an Associate Professor at the Faculty of Law, McGill University, Montréal. Graeme Orr is a Professor at the Law School, University of Queensland. Jeff King is a Professor of Law at the Faculty of Laws, University College London.

'This Handbook offers a comprehensive exploration of the implications of the 'deliberative turn' in legal and political philosophy for the theory and practice of constitutionalism. It investigates not only how deliberation can enhance constitution-making but also, and more innovatively and importantly, how it can improve the everyday working of constitutional systems. Deliberation thereby becomes an important goal of constitutional design. The focus on deliberation also serves to close the gap that is sometimes thought to exist between constitutionalism and democracy. As the authors show, democracy and constitutional law can mutually reinforce their respective deliberative qualities, increasing the legitimacy and justification of each.' Richard Bellamy, Director of the Max Weber Programme, European University Institute, Florence and University College London

• 1. Introduction Hoi Kong and Ron Levy; Part I. Deliberating Under Constitutions: 2. Reasoned administration and democratic legitimacy – reflections on American hybrid Jerry L Mashaw; 3. Deliberative constitutionalism in the national security setting Mary B. DeRosa and Mitt C. Regan, Jr; 4. Deliberative constitutionalism through the lens of the administrative state David Dyzenhaus; 5. Deliberative ideals and constitutionalism in the administrative state Geneviève Cartier; 6. Parliamentary human rights vetting and deliberation George Williams and Daniel Reynolds; 7. Constitutional deliberation in the legislative process Gabrielle Appleby and Anna Olijnyk; 8. Deliberative federalism Robyn Hollander and Haig Patapan; 9. Separation of powers and deliberative democracy Danny Gittings; 10. Dialogue, deliberation and human rights Alison L. Young; Part II. Comprehensive Views – Deliberating under and about Constitutions: 11. The deliberative constitution at common law T. R. S. Allan; 12. The role of snap judgments in constitutional deliberation – a dialectical equilibrium model Jonathan Crowe; 13. Deliberating about constitutionalism Mark D. Walters; 14. Compromise in deliberative constitutionalism Daniel Weinstock; 15. Constitutional change through deliberation Pavlos Eleftheriadis; 16. In defence of empirical entanglement – the methodological flaw in Waldron's case against judicial review Theunis Roux; 17. Deliberative constitutionalism: an empirical dimension Eric Ghosh; 18. The jury system as a cornerstone of deliberative democracy John Gastil and Dennis Hale; 19. Ideas of constitutions and deliberative democracy and how they interact John Parkinson; 20. Kickstarting the bootstrapping – Jürgen Habermas, deliberative constitutionalisation, and the limits of proceduralism Simone Chambers; Part III. Deliberating about Constitutions: 21. Deliberative democracy and the doctrine of unconstitutional constitutional amendments Joel Colón-Ríos; 22. Squaring the circle? Bringing deliberation and participation together in processes of constitution-making Silvia Suteu and Stephen Tierney; 23. Mini-publics and deliberative constitutionalism Stephen Elstub and Gianfranco Pomatto; 24. Popular constitutionalism and constitutional deliberation Gideon Sapir; 25. Constitutional reform and the problem of deliberation – building a 'civics infrastructure' for meaningful debate Sarah Sorial; 26. Deliberative or performative? Constitutional reform proposals and the politics of public engagement Chris Shore and David V. Williams; 27. The 'elite problem' in deliberative constitutionalism Ron Levy; Afterword Simone Chambers.