About the Editor John Henneberry is Professor of Property Development Studies at The University of Sheffield, UK, and a Chartered Planner and Chartered Surveyor. He has researched and published on property development and investment and their roles in urban and regional development for over 30 years. He is a Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, UK.

Select Guide Rating

• List of Contributors xiiiNotes on Contributors xvPreface xxiAcknowledgements xxv1 Introduction: Temporary Uses as Alternative Practices 1John HenneberryVacant land and temporary use 1Theorising and conceptualising temporary use 3Describing and analysing temporary uses 6Critical analysis of temporary use 9The coverage of the book 11Acknowledgement 13References 142 Forcing the Empties Back to Work? Ruinphobia and the Bluntness of Law and Policy 17Luke BennettIntroduction: gazing upon the New Ruins 17How ruinphobia unsettles us 18Tracing ruinphobia into urban law and policy 20Time is always running out for a building and its uses 26Is ruinphobia forcing empties back to work, or are law’s tools blunt? 27References 283 Liminal Spaces and Theorising the Permanence of Transience 31Nicola Livingstone and Peter MatthewsIntroduction 31Theorising transient spatialities 33Food banks as spaces of the in-between 36Temporalities and ‘yet-ness’ in Wester Hailes 39Conclusion 42References 434 Temporary Uses Producing Difference in Contemporary Urbanism 47Panu Lehtovuori and Sampo RuoppilaIntroduction 47The difference that temporary uses may produce 48Temporary uses, appropriation and the Right to the City 49Towards a socio-spatial theory of temporary uses – margins, fallows, amenities, commons 51Difference driven by users 54Temporary uses, regeneration and gentrification 57Conclusion: non-commodified spaces in a commodifying city 60References 625 Short-Term Projects, Long-Term Ambitions: Facets of Transience in Two London Development Sites 65Krystallia KamvasinouIntroduction 65Historical framework 66Case study 1: Canning Town Caravanserai: semi-public community and events space with emphasis on up-cycling 68Case study 2: Cultivate London Brentford Lock: urban farm and social enterprise project 73Analytical framework: key themes 78Concluding thoughts 80Acknowledgements 82References 826 Navigating the Rapids of Urban Development: Lessons from the Biospheric Foundation, Salford, UK 85Beth Perry, Vincent Walsh and Catherine BarlowIntroduction 85From vision to practice 86The Janus faces of urban socio-ecological experimentation 95Acknowledgements 98References 987 The Urban Voids of Istanbul 101Basak TanulkuIstanbul: global city of Turkey with no ‘vacancy’ 102Different types of urban voids in Istanbul 103Three case studies 105Physical void: from ghostly historic homes to high-value offices 105Physical void: squatting as an alternative space 108Symbolic void: the Ataturk Cultural Centre 111Conclusion 114Acknowledgments 115References 1158 Institutionalizing Urban Possibility: Urban Greening and Vacant Land Governance in Three American Cities 117Katherine FooState strategies in urban shrinkage 117Environmental coalitions in urban shrinkage 118Methods 119Civic environmental coalitions in weak land markets 120Windows of opportunity: political coalitions in Boston, Philadelphia, and Baltimore 122Political will and investment capacity: a counter-cyclical relationship 128References 1299 The Trajectory of Berlin’s ‘Interim Spaces’: Tensions and Conflicts in the Mobilisation of ‘Temporary Uses’ of Urban Space in Local Economic Development 131Claire Colomb‘Temporary uses’ and ‘interim spaces’ in reunified Berlin 132The mobilisation of ‘temporary uses’ in local economic development and place marketing policies 134The dilemmas and tensions inherent in the mobilisation of temporary uses as a tool of urban revitalisation: trajectories, conflicts and resistance 136The contested future of the Tempelhof airfield 141Conclusion 146References 14710 Pop-up Justice? Reflecting on Relationships in the Temporary City 151Amelia Thorpe, Timothy Moore and Lee StickellsTactics and interventions 151Justice in the city 154Attending to the particular 157Attending to the collective 161Conclusion 165Acknowledgements 166References 16611 Planning, Property Rights, and the Tragedy of the Anticommons: Temporary Uses in Portland and Detroit 171Matthew F GebhardtIntroduction 171The Tragedy of the Anticommons 172Anticommons and real estate development 173Anticommons, informality, and temporary use 175Case studies 177Conclusion 182References 18312 Valuation and the Evolution of New Uses and Buildings 185Neil Crosby and John HenneberryIntroduction 185The acceptance of the new 186The comparative approach to property valuation 189The institutional context of the application of comparison techniques 193The calculative regime of comparative valuation 195References 19613 Public Policy and Urban Transience: Provoking New Urban Development through Contemporary Models of Property Based Finance in England 199Kevin Muldoon-Smith and Paul GreenhalghIntroduction: public policy and urban transience 199Conceptual framework 200Fiscal decentralisation and the urban built environment 202Financing urban transience 206Discussion and conclusion 210References 21214 Tackling Hardcore Vacancy through Compulsory Sale Orders 215David AdamsIntroduction 215Hardcore vacancy 216An institutional explanation of hardcore vacancy 220Compulsory Sale Orders 224Balancing property rights and responsibilities 226Conclusions 228References 22915 Frameworks for Temporary Use: Experiments of Urban Regeneration in Bremen, Rome and Budapest 231Daniela Patti and Levente PolyakThe conditions of temporary use 232Transferring models 233Municipality-initiated temporary use: ZwischenZeitZentrale, Bremen 235Formalising activism: temporary use experiments in Rome 238Establishing trust: public and private initiatives for temporary use in Budapest 242Conclusions 246References 24816 Conclusions: The Tensions and Dilemmas of Transience 249John HenneberryTime, transience and temporality 250The structural position of transience in the urban system 252The transition from temporary to established use 256Policy and transience 260Conclusions 263Acknowledgements 264References 264Index 265

About the Editor John Henneberry is Professor of Property Development Studies at The University of Sheffield, UK, and a Chartered Planner and Chartered Surveyor. He has researched and published on property development and investment and their roles in urban and regional development for over 30 years. He is a Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, UK.

Select Guide Rating

• List of Contributors xiiiNotes on Contributors xvPreface xxiAcknowledgements xxv1 Introduction: Temporary Uses as Alternative Practices 1John HenneberryVacant land and temporary use 1Theorising and conceptualising temporary use 3Describing and analysing temporary uses 6Critical analysis of temporary use 9The coverage of the book 11Acknowledgement 13References 142 Forcing the Empties Back to Work? Ruinphobia and the Bluntness of Law and Policy 17Luke BennettIntroduction: gazing upon the New Ruins 17How ruinphobia unsettles us 18Tracing ruinphobia into urban law and policy 20Time is always running out for a building and its uses 26Is ruinphobia forcing empties back to work, or are law’s tools blunt? 27References 283 Liminal Spaces and Theorising the Permanence of Transience 31Nicola Livingstone and Peter MatthewsIntroduction 31Theorising transient spatialities 33Food banks as spaces of the in-between 36Temporalities and ‘yet-ness’ in Wester Hailes 39Conclusion 42References 434 Temporary Uses Producing Difference in Contemporary Urbanism 47Panu Lehtovuori and Sampo RuoppilaIntroduction 47The difference that temporary uses may produce 48Temporary uses, appropriation and the Right to the City 49Towards a socio-spatial theory of temporary uses – margins, fallows, amenities, commons 51Difference driven by users 54Temporary uses, regeneration and gentrification 57Conclusion: non-commodified spaces in a commodifying city 60References 625 Short-Term Projects, Long-Term Ambitions: Facets of Transience in Two London Development Sites 65Krystallia KamvasinouIntroduction 65Historical framework 66Case study 1: Canning Town Caravanserai: semi-public community and events space with emphasis on up-cycling 68Case study 2: Cultivate London Brentford Lock: urban farm and social enterprise project 73Analytical framework: key themes 78Concluding thoughts 80Acknowledgements 82References 826 Navigating the Rapids of Urban Development: Lessons from the Biospheric Foundation, Salford, UK 85Beth Perry, Vincent Walsh and Catherine BarlowIntroduction 85From vision to practice 86The Janus faces of urban socio-ecological experimentation 95Acknowledgements 98References 987 The Urban Voids of Istanbul 101Basak TanulkuIstanbul: global city of Turkey with no ‘vacancy’ 102Different types of urban voids in Istanbul 103Three case studies 105Physical void: from ghostly historic homes to high-value offices 105Physical void: squatting as an alternative space 108Symbolic void: the Ataturk Cultural Centre 111Conclusion 114Acknowledgments 115References 1158 Institutionalizing Urban Possibility: Urban Greening and Vacant Land Governance in Three American Cities 117Katherine FooState strategies in urban shrinkage 117Environmental coalitions in urban shrinkage 118Methods 119Civic environmental coalitions in weak land markets 120Windows of opportunity: political coalitions in Boston, Philadelphia, and Baltimore 122Political will and investment capacity: a counter-cyclical relationship 128References 1299 The Trajectory of Berlin’s ‘Interim Spaces’: Tensions and Conflicts in the Mobilisation of ‘Temporary Uses’ of Urban Space in Local Economic Development 131Claire Colomb‘Temporary uses’ and ‘interim spaces’ in reunified Berlin 132The mobilisation of ‘temporary uses’ in local economic development and place marketing policies 134The dilemmas and tensions inherent in the mobilisation of temporary uses as a tool of urban revitalisation: trajectories, conflicts and resistance 136The contested future of the Tempelhof airfield 141Conclusion 146References 14710 Pop-up Justice? Reflecting on Relationships in the Temporary City 151Amelia Thorpe, Timothy Moore and Lee StickellsTactics and interventions 151Justice in the city 154Attending to the particular 157Attending to the collective 161Conclusion 165Acknowledgements 166References 16611 Planning, Property Rights, and the Tragedy of the Anticommons: Temporary Uses in Portland and Detroit 171Matthew F GebhardtIntroduction 171The Tragedy of the Anticommons 172Anticommons and real estate development 173Anticommons, informality, and temporary use 175Case studies 177Conclusion 182References 18312 Valuation and the Evolution of New Uses and Buildings 185Neil Crosby and John HenneberryIntroduction 185The acceptance of the new 186The comparative approach to property valuation 189The institutional context of the application of comparison techniques 193The calculative regime of comparative valuation 195References 19613 Public Policy and Urban Transience: Provoking New Urban Development through Contemporary Models of Property Based Finance in England 199Kevin Muldoon-Smith and Paul GreenhalghIntroduction: public policy and urban transience 199Conceptual framework 200Fiscal decentralisation and the urban built environment 202Financing urban transience 206Discussion and conclusion 210References 21214 Tackling Hardcore Vacancy through Compulsory Sale Orders 215David AdamsIntroduction 215Hardcore vacancy 216An institutional explanation of hardcore vacancy 220Compulsory Sale Orders 224Balancing property rights and responsibilities 226Conclusions 228References 22915 Frameworks for Temporary Use: Experiments of Urban Regeneration in Bremen, Rome and Budapest 231Daniela Patti and Levente PolyakThe conditions of temporary use 232Transferring models 233Municipality-initiated temporary use: ZwischenZeitZentrale, Bremen 235Formalising activism: temporary use experiments in Rome 238Establishing trust: public and private initiatives for temporary use in Budapest 242Conclusions 246References 24816 Conclusions: The Tensions and Dilemmas of Transience 249John HenneberryTime, transience and temporality 250The structural position of transience in the urban system 252The transition from temporary to established use 256Policy and transience 260Conclusions 263Acknowledgements 264References 264Index 265

About the Editor John Henneberry is Professor of Property Development Studies at The University of Sheffield, UK, and a Chartered Planner and Chartered Surveyor. He has researched and published on property development and investment and their roles in urban and regional development for over 30 years. He is a Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, UK.

Select Guide Rating

• List of Contributors xiiiNotes on Contributors xvPreface xxiAcknowledgements xxv1 Introduction: Temporary Uses as Alternative Practices 1John HenneberryVacant land and temporary use 1Theorising and conceptualising temporary use 3Describing and analysing temporary uses 6Critical analysis of temporary use 9The coverage of the book 11Acknowledgement 13References 142 Forcing the Empties Back to Work? Ruinphobia and the Bluntness of Law and Policy 17Luke BennettIntroduction: gazing upon the New Ruins 17How ruinphobia unsettles us 18Tracing ruinphobia into urban law and policy 20Time is always running out for a building and its uses 26Is ruinphobia forcing empties back to work, or are law’s tools blunt? 27References 283 Liminal Spaces and Theorising the Permanence of Transience 31Nicola Livingstone and Peter MatthewsIntroduction 31Theorising transient spatialities 33Food banks as spaces of the in-between 36Temporalities and ‘yet-ness’ in Wester Hailes 39Conclusion 42References 434 Temporary Uses Producing Difference in Contemporary Urbanism 47Panu Lehtovuori and Sampo RuoppilaIntroduction 47The difference that temporary uses may produce 48Temporary uses, appropriation and the Right to the City 49Towards a socio-spatial theory of temporary uses – margins, fallows, amenities, commons 51Difference driven by users 54Temporary uses, regeneration and gentrification 57Conclusion: non-commodified spaces in a commodifying city 60References 625 Short-Term Projects, Long-Term Ambitions: Facets of Transience in Two London Development Sites 65Krystallia KamvasinouIntroduction 65Historical framework 66Case study 1: Canning Town Caravanserai: semi-public community and events space with emphasis on up-cycling 68Case study 2: Cultivate London Brentford Lock: urban farm and social enterprise project 73Analytical framework: key themes 78Concluding thoughts 80Acknowledgements 82References 826 Navigating the Rapids of Urban Development: Lessons from the Biospheric Foundation, Salford, UK 85Beth Perry, Vincent Walsh and Catherine BarlowIntroduction 85From vision to practice 86The Janus faces of urban socio-ecological experimentation 95Acknowledgements 98References 987 The Urban Voids of Istanbul 101Basak TanulkuIstanbul: global city of Turkey with no ‘vacancy’ 102Different types of urban voids in Istanbul 103Three case studies 105Physical void: from ghostly historic homes to high-value offices 105Physical void: squatting as an alternative space 108Symbolic void: the Ataturk Cultural Centre 111Conclusion 114Acknowledgments 115References 1158 Institutionalizing Urban Possibility: Urban Greening and Vacant Land Governance in Three American Cities 117Katherine FooState strategies in urban shrinkage 117Environmental coalitions in urban shrinkage 118Methods 119Civic environmental coalitions in weak land markets 120Windows of opportunity: political coalitions in Boston, Philadelphia, and Baltimore 122Political will and investment capacity: a counter-cyclical relationship 128References 1299 The Trajectory of Berlin’s ‘Interim Spaces’: Tensions and Conflicts in the Mobilisation of ‘Temporary Uses’ of Urban Space in Local Economic Development 131Claire Colomb‘Temporary uses’ and ‘interim spaces’ in reunified Berlin 132The mobilisation of ‘temporary uses’ in local economic development and place marketing policies 134The dilemmas and tensions inherent in the mobilisation of temporary uses as a tool of urban revitalisation: trajectories, conflicts and resistance 136The contested future of the Tempelhof airfield 141Conclusion 146References 14710 Pop-up Justice? Reflecting on Relationships in the Temporary City 151Amelia Thorpe, Timothy Moore and Lee StickellsTactics and interventions 151Justice in the city 154Attending to the particular 157Attending to the collective 161Conclusion 165Acknowledgements 166References 16611 Planning, Property Rights, and the Tragedy of the Anticommons: Temporary Uses in Portland and Detroit 171Matthew F GebhardtIntroduction 171The Tragedy of the Anticommons 172Anticommons and real estate development 173Anticommons, informality, and temporary use 175Case studies 177Conclusion 182References 18312 Valuation and the Evolution of New Uses and Buildings 185Neil Crosby and John HenneberryIntroduction 185The acceptance of the new 186The comparative approach to property valuation 189The institutional context of the application of comparison techniques 193The calculative regime of comparative valuation 195References 19613 Public Policy and Urban Transience: Provoking New Urban Development through Contemporary Models of Property Based Finance in England 199Kevin Muldoon-Smith and Paul GreenhalghIntroduction: public policy and urban transience 199Conceptual framework 200Fiscal decentralisation and the urban built environment 202Financing urban transience 206Discussion and conclusion 210References 21214 Tackling Hardcore Vacancy through Compulsory Sale Orders 215David AdamsIntroduction 215Hardcore vacancy 216An institutional explanation of hardcore vacancy 220Compulsory Sale Orders 224Balancing property rights and responsibilities 226Conclusions 228References 22915 Frameworks for Temporary Use: Experiments of Urban Regeneration in Bremen, Rome and Budapest 231Daniela Patti and Levente PolyakThe conditions of temporary use 232Transferring models 233Municipality-initiated temporary use: ZwischenZeitZentrale, Bremen 235Formalising activism: temporary use experiments in Rome 238Establishing trust: public and private initiatives for temporary use in Budapest 242Conclusions 246References 24816 Conclusions: The Tensions and Dilemmas of Transience 249John HenneberryTime, transience and temporality 250The structural position of transience in the urban system 252The transition from temporary to established use 256Policy and transience 260Conclusions 263Acknowledgements 264References 264Index 265