Garret Pagenstecher Olberding is Associate Professor of History at the University of Oklahoma. He is the author of Dubious Facts: The Evidence of Early Chinese Historiography (2012).

'Garret Pagenstecher Olberding's Designing Boundaries in Early China is a breath of fresh air, in the occasionally sclerotic field of Chinese geography. Far from confusing the model with realities on the ground, he shows us, again and again, how maps induced and guided the conceptual pathways in the antique world he knows so well. The book raises a number of intriguing questions, such as, did the spatial senses of 'neighbor,' 'boundary,' and 'enemy' experience a tectonic shift during or after the late Warring States period? What, if anything, is distinctively 'Chinese' in the early writings in classical Chinese? How did the imperial court view itself, and imagine it was viewed by others? To what degree did people think the not-yet civilized could be civilized and by what means? These are probing questions, not easily answered, so let the debates begin!' Michael Nylan, University of California, Berkeley

• Preamble; 1. The basis of ancient borders; 2. The visual modeling of space in text and map; 3. Movement and geography; 4. The perception of the 'state': the internal definition of sovereign space; 5. The perception of the 'enemy': the external definition of sovereign space; 6. Transgressions: rupturing the boundaries between sovereignties; Conclusion.

Garret Pagenstecher Olberding is Associate Professor of History at the University of Oklahoma. He is the author of Dubious Facts: The Evidence of Early Chinese Historiography (2012).

'Garret Pagenstecher Olberding's Designing Boundaries in Early China is a breath of fresh air, in the occasionally sclerotic field of Chinese geography. Far from confusing the model with realities on the ground, he shows us, again and again, how maps induced and guided the conceptual pathways in the antique world he knows so well. The book raises a number of intriguing questions, such as, did the spatial senses of 'neighbor,' 'boundary,' and 'enemy' experience a tectonic shift during or after the late Warring States period? What, if anything, is distinctively 'Chinese' in the early writings in classical Chinese? How did the imperial court view itself, and imagine it was viewed by others? To what degree did people think the not-yet civilized could be civilized and by what means? These are probing questions, not easily answered, so let the debates begin!' Michael Nylan, University of California, Berkeley

• Preamble; 1. The basis of ancient borders; 2. The visual modeling of space in text and map; 3. Movement and geography; 4. The perception of the 'state': the internal definition of sovereign space; 5. The perception of the 'enemy': the external definition of sovereign space; 6. Transgressions: rupturing the boundaries between sovereignties; Conclusion.