Carl F. Cranor is Distinguished Professor of Philosophy, a faculty member of the Environmental Toxicology Graduate Program, and a Distinguished Teaching Professor at the University of California, Riverside, conducting research on science and the law. His books include Regulating Toxic Substances (1993) and Legally Poisoned (2011).

Review of previous edition: '[Carl F. Cranor's Toxic Torts] makes clear why he is the best-qualified philosopher to address the complex issues raised by toxic tort cases. I know of no other book that can match its scope and depth of treatment of the philosophical, scientific, and legal issues.' Douglas Maclean, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

• Preface; 1. The veil of science over tort law policy; 2. Legal background; 3. Institutional concerns about the Supreme Court's trilogy; 4. Evidence of toxicity; 5. Scientific reasoning and some applications; 6. Excellent evidence makes bad law: pragmatic barriers to the discovery of harm and fair admissibility; 7. Science and law in conflict; 8. Milward v. Acuity Specialty Products: toward clarifying legal and scientific issues; 9. Enhancing the possibility of justice under Daubert; 10. What has Daubert wrought?; Bibliography; Index.

Carl F. Cranor is Distinguished Professor of Philosophy, a faculty member of the Environmental Toxicology Graduate Program, and a Distinguished Teaching Professor at the University of California, Riverside, conducting research on science and the law. His books include Regulating Toxic Substances (1993) and Legally Poisoned (2011).

Review of previous edition: '[Carl F. Cranor's Toxic Torts] makes clear why he is the best-qualified philosopher to address the complex issues raised by toxic tort cases. I know of no other book that can match its scope and depth of treatment of the philosophical, scientific, and legal issues.' Douglas Maclean, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

• Preface; 1. The veil of science over tort law policy; 2. Legal background; 3. Institutional concerns about the Supreme Court's trilogy; 4. Evidence of toxicity; 5. Scientific reasoning and some applications; 6. Excellent evidence makes bad law: pragmatic barriers to the discovery of harm and fair admissibility; 7. Science and law in conflict; 8. Milward v. Acuity Specialty Products: toward clarifying legal and scientific issues; 9. Enhancing the possibility of justice under Daubert; 10. What has Daubert wrought?; Bibliography; Index.

Carl F. Cranor is Distinguished Professor of Philosophy, a faculty member of the Environmental Toxicology Graduate Program, and a Distinguished Teaching Professor at the University of California, Riverside, conducting research on science and the law. His books include Regulating Toxic Substances (1993) and Legally Poisoned (2011).

Review of previous edition: '[Carl F. Cranor's Toxic Torts] makes clear why he is the best-qualified philosopher to address the complex issues raised by toxic tort cases. I know of no other book that can match its scope and depth of treatment of the philosophical, scientific, and legal issues.' Douglas Maclean, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

• Preface; 1. The veil of science over tort law policy; 2. Legal background; 3. Institutional concerns about the Supreme Court's trilogy; 4. Evidence of toxicity; 5. Scientific reasoning and some applications; 6. Excellent evidence makes bad law: pragmatic barriers to the discovery of harm and fair admissibility; 7. Science and law in conflict; 8. Milward v. Acuity Specialty Products: toward clarifying legal and scientific issues; 9. Enhancing the possibility of justice under Daubert; 10. What has Daubert wrought?; Bibliography; Index.