Emmett Macfarlane is a professor of political science at the University of Waterloo.Kate Puddister is an associate professor of political science at the University of Guelph.

• Foreword The Honourable Justice Malcolm Rowe Introduction: Political Science and Law: Shared Foundations and Disciplinary DividesKate Puddister and Emmett Macfarlane Part I: Examining the Divides Chapter 1: Legal Blindspots in Canadian Political ScienceDennis Baker and Byron Sheldrick Chapter 2: Who Cites Who? An Empirical Study of the Research Foundations of the Canadian Law and Politics SubfieldAndrew McDougall and Charles Buck Chapter 3: Taking Power Seriously: Studying Aboriginal Rights in Formal and Informal Loci of PowerMinh Do Chapter 4: Portrait of the Political Scientist as an Expert WitnessChristopher Manfredi Chapter 5: The Role of Government LawyersMatthew Hennigar Chapter 6: Dialogue Theory and Legislative Responses: What the Metaphor Missed (or Perhaps Misunderstood about Courts and Legislatures)James B. Kelly Part II: Dialogues across the Disciplinary Divide Chapter 7: Partisan Divides and Disciplinary Divides? Political Scientists, Legal Scholars, and the Politics of Judicial SelectionMark Harding Chapter 8: Response: Canada’s Indispensable Legal and Political Constitutionalism: Some Observations on Constitutionalism from a (Primarily) Legal PerspectiveWarren Newman Chapter 9: Canadian Political Science’s Unfortunate Neglect of Administrative LawDavid Said and Dennis Baker Chapter 10: Response: Collaboration at the Intersection of Administrative Law and Political SciencePaul Daly Chapter 11: Law and Social Science: A Sustainable Jurisprudence of Canadian FederalismPeter C. Oliver Chapter 12: Response: On Being Judgmatical: Judicial Choices and How to Think about Hard versus Easy CasesChrista Scholtz Chapter 13: Political Revival, Scholarly Renaissance: Academic Writing on the Notwithstanding Clause, 1982–2023Dave Snow Chapter 14: Response: Notwithstanding Constitutional Law, Politics, and ScholarshipEric M. Adams and Catherine Ford Chapter 15: Why Law Was Late to Comparative Constitutional AmendmentRichard Albert Chapter 16: Response: Political Science and the Study of Constitutional AmendmentEmmett Macfarlane Part III: Disciplinary Dexterity and Scholarly Collaborations Chapter 17: Parallel Narratives, Divergent Disciplines: Examining Advisory OpinionsCarissima Mathen and Kate Puddister Chapter 18: Finding Common Ground? Campaign Finance LawErin Crandall and Michael Pal Chapter 19: The Anti-Disciplinary Divide: Canada’s Safe Third Country Agreement, Roxham Road, and the Politicization of Legal LoopholesMegan Gaucher and Shauna Labman Selected Bibliography

Emmett Macfarlane is a professor of political science at the University of Waterloo.Kate Puddister is an associate professor of political science at the University of Guelph.

• Foreword The Honourable Justice Malcolm Rowe Introduction: Political Science and Law: Shared Foundations and Disciplinary DividesKate Puddister and Emmett Macfarlane Part I: Examining the Divides Chapter 1: Legal Blindspots in Canadian Political ScienceDennis Baker and Byron Sheldrick Chapter 2: Who Cites Who? An Empirical Study of the Research Foundations of the Canadian Law and Politics SubfieldAndrew McDougall and Charles Buck Chapter 3: Taking Power Seriously: Studying Aboriginal Rights in Formal and Informal Loci of PowerMinh Do Chapter 4: Portrait of the Political Scientist as an Expert WitnessChristopher Manfredi Chapter 5: The Role of Government LawyersMatthew Hennigar Chapter 6: Dialogue Theory and Legislative Responses: What the Metaphor Missed (or Perhaps Misunderstood about Courts and Legislatures)James B. Kelly Part II: Dialogues across the Disciplinary Divide Chapter 7: Partisan Divides and Disciplinary Divides? Political Scientists, Legal Scholars, and the Politics of Judicial SelectionMark Harding Chapter 8: Response: Canada’s Indispensable Legal and Political Constitutionalism: Some Observations on Constitutionalism from a (Primarily) Legal PerspectiveWarren Newman Chapter 9: Canadian Political Science’s Unfortunate Neglect of Administrative LawDavid Said and Dennis Baker Chapter 10: Response: Collaboration at the Intersection of Administrative Law and Political SciencePaul Daly Chapter 11: Law and Social Science: A Sustainable Jurisprudence of Canadian FederalismPeter C. Oliver Chapter 12: Response: On Being Judgmatical: Judicial Choices and How to Think about Hard versus Easy CasesChrista Scholtz Chapter 13: Political Revival, Scholarly Renaissance: Academic Writing on the Notwithstanding Clause, 1982–2023Dave Snow Chapter 14: Response: Notwithstanding Constitutional Law, Politics, and ScholarshipEric M. Adams and Catherine Ford Chapter 15: Why Law Was Late to Comparative Constitutional AmendmentRichard Albert Chapter 16: Response: Political Science and the Study of Constitutional AmendmentEmmett Macfarlane Part III: Disciplinary Dexterity and Scholarly Collaborations Chapter 17: Parallel Narratives, Divergent Disciplines: Examining Advisory OpinionsCarissima Mathen and Kate Puddister Chapter 18: Finding Common Ground? Campaign Finance LawErin Crandall and Michael Pal Chapter 19: The Anti-Disciplinary Divide: Canada’s Safe Third Country Agreement, Roxham Road, and the Politicization of Legal LoopholesMegan Gaucher and Shauna Labman Selected Bibliography

Emmett Macfarlane is a professor of political science at the University of Waterloo.Kate Puddister is an associate professor of political science at the University of Guelph.

• Foreword The Honourable Justice Malcolm Rowe Introduction: Political Science and Law: Shared Foundations and Disciplinary DividesKate Puddister and Emmett Macfarlane Part I: Examining the Divides Chapter 1: Legal Blindspots in Canadian Political ScienceDennis Baker and Byron Sheldrick Chapter 2: Who Cites Who? An Empirical Study of the Research Foundations of the Canadian Law and Politics SubfieldAndrew McDougall and Charles Buck Chapter 3: Taking Power Seriously: Studying Aboriginal Rights in Formal and Informal Loci of PowerMinh Do Chapter 4: Portrait of the Political Scientist as an Expert WitnessChristopher Manfredi Chapter 5: The Role of Government LawyersMatthew Hennigar Chapter 6: Dialogue Theory and Legislative Responses: What the Metaphor Missed (or Perhaps Misunderstood about Courts and Legislatures)James B. Kelly Part II: Dialogues across the Disciplinary Divide Chapter 7: Partisan Divides and Disciplinary Divides? Political Scientists, Legal Scholars, and the Politics of Judicial SelectionMark Harding Chapter 8: Response: Canada’s Indispensable Legal and Political Constitutionalism: Some Observations on Constitutionalism from a (Primarily) Legal PerspectiveWarren Newman Chapter 9: Canadian Political Science’s Unfortunate Neglect of Administrative LawDavid Said and Dennis Baker Chapter 10: Response: Collaboration at the Intersection of Administrative Law and Political SciencePaul Daly Chapter 11: Law and Social Science: A Sustainable Jurisprudence of Canadian FederalismPeter C. Oliver Chapter 12: Response: On Being Judgmatical: Judicial Choices and How to Think about Hard versus Easy CasesChrista Scholtz Chapter 13: Political Revival, Scholarly Renaissance: Academic Writing on the Notwithstanding Clause, 1982–2023Dave Snow Chapter 14: Response: Notwithstanding Constitutional Law, Politics, and ScholarshipEric M. Adams and Catherine Ford Chapter 15: Why Law Was Late to Comparative Constitutional AmendmentRichard Albert Chapter 16: Response: Political Science and the Study of Constitutional AmendmentEmmett Macfarlane Part III: Disciplinary Dexterity and Scholarly Collaborations Chapter 17: Parallel Narratives, Divergent Disciplines: Examining Advisory OpinionsCarissima Mathen and Kate Puddister Chapter 18: Finding Common Ground? Campaign Finance LawErin Crandall and Michael Pal Chapter 19: The Anti-Disciplinary Divide: Canada’s Safe Third Country Agreement, Roxham Road, and the Politicization of Legal LoopholesMegan Gaucher and Shauna Labman Selected Bibliography