E-bok, Engelska, 2013
Ethics of Nonviolence
Essays by Robert L. Holmes
Av Robert L. Holmes, Predrag Cicovacki
561 kr
Läs direkt i Bokus Reader – eller ladda ned till din enhet (PDF kräver ofta zoom och scroll på små skärmar).
Beskrivning
Produktinformation
- Utgivningsdatum: 2013-06-20
- Språk: Engelska
- Antal sidor: 256
- Filformat: PDF
- Kopieringsskydd: LCP
- ISBN: 9781623569624
- Förlag: Bloomsbury Publishing PLC (Digital)
Utforska kategorier
Mer om författaren
Robert L. Holmes is Professor Emeritus of Philosophy at the University of Rochester, USA. His main research is in philosophy of war, the ethics of nonviolence, and contemporary moral problems. He is the author of Basic Moral Philosophy (Wadsworth, 4th edition, 2006) and On War and Morality (Princeton University Press, 1989), co-author of Philosophical Inquiry (Prentice Hall, 2nd edition, 1968), and co-editor of Nonviolence in Theory and Practice (Wadsworth, 3rd edition, 1990). He has published over 75 scholarly papers.Predrag Cicovacki is Professor of Philosophy at the College of the Holy Cross, MA, USA. He has published over fifty philosophy papers published in English, Serbian, German, Russian, Chinese, and Slovenian and is the author or editor of nine books, including Albert Schweitzer's Ethical Vision: A Sourcebook (with Introduction, Oxford University Press, 2009).
Recensioner i media
Long before Richard Rorty and Hilary Putnam praised in print the insights of William James and John Dewey, Robert Holmes shed light on the philosophical importance of the classical pragmatists. Long before Larry May and Jeff McMahan debated the merits of pacifism, just war theory, and war realism, Robert Holmes made the case for contingent pacifism. Holmes's distinctions among and insights concerning the various forms of pragmatism, pacifism, and nonviolence help debunk the easy dismissal of these views. The collected papers of Robert Holmes shed light on why those who summarily reject all forms of pragmatism, pacifism, or nonviolence do so because they continue to misrepresent these important but too often trivialized philosophical views.
Betyg & recensioner
0 recensioner
Inga recensioner tillgängliga.