“The book will serve as a wellspring for more specific comparisons and as a methodological example for future scholarship.” · Choice“…[a] well-written, thoughtful, and engaging study… This work’s novelty is its comparative approach in its examination of diverse narratives and in its use of the sources of collective memory—prose, poetry, art, and song, as well as engineering studies, and public pamphlets and documents…This book is welcome as a contribution to the history of rivers, comparative and transnational history, environmental history, and history of technology. It can be used in high schools or universities.” · Journal of Anthropological Research“There is much to celebrate about Rivers, Memory, and Nation Building; its comparative international perspective is something that environmental historians undertake far too infrequently. The approach is bold, refreshing, and insightful. Anyone who takes the time to read this well-written and carefully organized study will come away with a good understanding of the roles of the Mississippi and Volga Rivers in the history of their respective nations. If this volume also stimulates a discussion of how we interpret and explain the environmental history of rivers that would be an additional, important contribution to the field.” · Canadian Journal of History“All told, despite the obvious constraints such as limited access to Russian-language sources, this is a very good book. It is interesting, informative and thought-provoking at many levels. It is written with a degree of balance which is much to be commended. And it certainly makes an important contribution to environmental history, to historical geography and, not least, to Russian Studies.” · Human Ecology“The arguments and themes in Rivers, Memory and Nation-Building are credible, and the book as a whole is both engaging and well researched… Despite the relatively short length, Dorothy Zeisler-Vralsted has given us a readable history that is thoroughly documented, persuasively written, and historiographically significant. Most notably, the book brings an important component to the study of environmental history—a comparative perspective… The infusion of a comparative and international analysis is welcome and refreshing.” · Environmental History“The main themes and insights are strong ones…As well as offering a worthy and inspired comparison, this is a genuine and systematic comparison with a clear structure and steadily building momentum: a good balance is struck between the two rivers and the author frequently alternates between them, but without confusing the reader.” · Peter Coates, The University of Bristol“This is a concise and convincing comparative discussion of two major rivers. It is clearly shown that political systems were less important than the overarching twentieth century idea of modernization…Harnessing rivers for a free world was a common view – different ideas of ‘freedom’ may have existed, but the rivers were to be harnessed in strikingly similar ways. The comparative approach of the book, supported by appropriate details of each river and projects, allows for pointing out the main issues, questions and evidence, and shows how alike the two opposing political systems were when it came to river development.” · Maurits Ertsen, Delft University of Technology
