F.M. Scherer, Professor of Public Policy and Corporate Management in the Aetna Chair, Emeritus, Harvard Kennedy School of Government, US

• Contents:Introduction F.M. SchererPART IMONOPOLIES AND MONOPOLIZATION 1. F.M. Scherer (2008), ‘Technological Innovation and Monopolization’, in Wayne D. Collins and Joseph Angland (eds), Issues in Competition Law and Policy, Volume II, Chapter 44, Chicago, IL, USA: American Bar Association, 1033–682. F.M. Scherer (2011), ‘Standard Oil as a Technological Innovator’, Review of Industrial Organization, 38 (1), May, 225–333. F.M. Scherer (2003), ‘Microsoft and IBM in Europe’, Antitrust and Trade Regulation Report, 84 (2090), January 24th, 65–64. Frederic M. Scherer (2013), ‘Abuse of Dominance by High Technology Enterprises: A Comparison of U.S. and E.C. Approaches’, Economia e Politica Industriale – Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, 38 (1), March, 39–62PART IIMERGER POLICY 5. F.M. Scherer (2006), ‘A New Retrospective on Mergers’, Review of Industrial Organization, 28 (4), June, 327–416. F.M. Scherer (2012), ‘Merger Efficiencies and Competition Policy’, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Note DAF/COMP/WD(2012)47, October, 2–97. F.M. Scherer (2009), ‘On the Paternity of a Market Delineation Approach’, American Antitrust Institute Working Paper #09-01, February, 2–108. William S. Comanor and F.M. Scherer (2013), ‘Mergers and Innovation in the Pharmaceutical Industry’, Journal of Health Economics, 32 (1), January, 106–13PART IIIOTHER MONOPOLISTIC PRACTICES 9. F.M. Scherer (2015), ‘The Federal Trade Commission, Oligopoly, and Shared Monopoly’, Review of Industrial Organization, 46 (1), February, 5–2310. F.M. Scherer (2004), ‘Vertical Relations in Antitrust: Some Intellectual History’, Antitrust Bulletin, 49, Winter, 841–5811. Brief for William S. Comanor and Frederic M. Scherer as Amici Curiae Supporting Neither Party (2006), Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc., Petitioner v. Psks, Inc., Respondent’, the Supreme Court of the United States of America, No. 06-480, title page, i–iii, 1–1112. F.M. Scherer (2004), ‘Retailer-Instigated Restraints on Suppliers’ Sales: Toys “R” Us (2000)’, in John Kwoka and L.J. White (eds), The Antritrust Revolution, 4th edn, Case 16, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 441–5513. Frederic M. Scherer (2012), ‘Class Actions in the U.S. Experience: An Economist’s Perception’, in Jürgen G. Backhaus, Alberto Cassone and Giovanni B. Ramello (eds), The Law and Economics of Class Actions in Europe: Lessons from America, Chapter 3, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing, 27–36PART IVPOLICY FOR DEVELOPING COUNTRIES 14. F.M. Scherer and Jayashree Watal (2014), ‘Competition Policy and Intellectual Property: Insights from Developed Country Experience’, John F. Kennedy School of Government Faculty Research Working Paper RWP14-013, February, 1–33Index

F.M. Scherer, Professor of Public Policy and Corporate Management in the Aetna Chair, Emeritus, Harvard Kennedy School of Government, US

• Contents:Introduction F.M. SchererPART IMONOPOLIES AND MONOPOLIZATION 1. F.M. Scherer (2008), ‘Technological Innovation and Monopolization’, in Wayne D. Collins and Joseph Angland (eds), Issues in Competition Law and Policy, Volume II, Chapter 44, Chicago, IL, USA: American Bar Association, 1033–682. F.M. Scherer (2011), ‘Standard Oil as a Technological Innovator’, Review of Industrial Organization, 38 (1), May, 225–333. F.M. Scherer (2003), ‘Microsoft and IBM in Europe’, Antitrust and Trade Regulation Report, 84 (2090), January 24th, 65–64. Frederic M. Scherer (2013), ‘Abuse of Dominance by High Technology Enterprises: A Comparison of U.S. and E.C. Approaches’, Economia e Politica Industriale – Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, 38 (1), March, 39–62PART IIMERGER POLICY 5. F.M. Scherer (2006), ‘A New Retrospective on Mergers’, Review of Industrial Organization, 28 (4), June, 327–416. F.M. Scherer (2012), ‘Merger Efficiencies and Competition Policy’, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Note DAF/COMP/WD(2012)47, October, 2–97. F.M. Scherer (2009), ‘On the Paternity of a Market Delineation Approach’, American Antitrust Institute Working Paper #09-01, February, 2–108. William S. Comanor and F.M. Scherer (2013), ‘Mergers and Innovation in the Pharmaceutical Industry’, Journal of Health Economics, 32 (1), January, 106–13PART IIIOTHER MONOPOLISTIC PRACTICES 9. F.M. Scherer (2015), ‘The Federal Trade Commission, Oligopoly, and Shared Monopoly’, Review of Industrial Organization, 46 (1), February, 5–2310. F.M. Scherer (2004), ‘Vertical Relations in Antitrust: Some Intellectual History’, Antitrust Bulletin, 49, Winter, 841–5811. Brief for William S. Comanor and Frederic M. Scherer as Amici Curiae Supporting Neither Party (2006), Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc., Petitioner v. Psks, Inc., Respondent’, the Supreme Court of the United States of America, No. 06-480, title page, i–iii, 1–1112. F.M. Scherer (2004), ‘Retailer-Instigated Restraints on Suppliers’ Sales: Toys “R” Us (2000)’, in John Kwoka and L.J. White (eds), The Antritrust Revolution, 4th edn, Case 16, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 441–5513. Frederic M. Scherer (2012), ‘Class Actions in the U.S. Experience: An Economist’s Perception’, in Jürgen G. Backhaus, Alberto Cassone and Giovanni B. Ramello (eds), The Law and Economics of Class Actions in Europe: Lessons from America, Chapter 3, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing, 27–36PART IVPOLICY FOR DEVELOPING COUNTRIES 14. F.M. Scherer and Jayashree Watal (2014), ‘Competition Policy and Intellectual Property: Insights from Developed Country Experience’, John F. Kennedy School of Government Faculty Research Working Paper RWP14-013, February, 1–33Index

F.M. Scherer, Professor of Public Policy and Corporate Management in the Aetna Chair, Emeritus, Harvard Kennedy School of Government, US

• Contents:Introduction F.M. SchererPART IMONOPOLIES AND MONOPOLIZATION 1. F.M. Scherer (2008), ‘Technological Innovation and Monopolization’, in Wayne D. Collins and Joseph Angland (eds), Issues in Competition Law and Policy, Volume II, Chapter 44, Chicago, IL, USA: American Bar Association, 1033–682. F.M. Scherer (2011), ‘Standard Oil as a Technological Innovator’, Review of Industrial Organization, 38 (1), May, 225–333. F.M. Scherer (2003), ‘Microsoft and IBM in Europe’, Antitrust and Trade Regulation Report, 84 (2090), January 24th, 65–64. Frederic M. Scherer (2013), ‘Abuse of Dominance by High Technology Enterprises: A Comparison of U.S. and E.C. Approaches’, Economia e Politica Industriale – Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, 38 (1), March, 39–62PART IIMERGER POLICY 5. F.M. Scherer (2006), ‘A New Retrospective on Mergers’, Review of Industrial Organization, 28 (4), June, 327–416. F.M. Scherer (2012), ‘Merger Efficiencies and Competition Policy’, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Note DAF/COMP/WD(2012)47, October, 2–97. F.M. Scherer (2009), ‘On the Paternity of a Market Delineation Approach’, American Antitrust Institute Working Paper #09-01, February, 2–108. William S. Comanor and F.M. Scherer (2013), ‘Mergers and Innovation in the Pharmaceutical Industry’, Journal of Health Economics, 32 (1), January, 106–13PART IIIOTHER MONOPOLISTIC PRACTICES 9. F.M. Scherer (2015), ‘The Federal Trade Commission, Oligopoly, and Shared Monopoly’, Review of Industrial Organization, 46 (1), February, 5–2310. F.M. Scherer (2004), ‘Vertical Relations in Antitrust: Some Intellectual History’, Antitrust Bulletin, 49, Winter, 841–5811. Brief for William S. Comanor and Frederic M. Scherer as Amici Curiae Supporting Neither Party (2006), Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc., Petitioner v. Psks, Inc., Respondent’, the Supreme Court of the United States of America, No. 06-480, title page, i–iii, 1–1112. F.M. Scherer (2004), ‘Retailer-Instigated Restraints on Suppliers’ Sales: Toys “R” Us (2000)’, in John Kwoka and L.J. White (eds), The Antritrust Revolution, 4th edn, Case 16, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 441–5513. Frederic M. Scherer (2012), ‘Class Actions in the U.S. Experience: An Economist’s Perception’, in Jürgen G. Backhaus, Alberto Cassone and Giovanni B. Ramello (eds), The Law and Economics of Class Actions in Europe: Lessons from America, Chapter 3, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing, 27–36PART IVPOLICY FOR DEVELOPING COUNTRIES 14. F.M. Scherer and Jayashree Watal (2014), ‘Competition Policy and Intellectual Property: Insights from Developed Country Experience’, John F. Kennedy School of Government Faculty Research Working Paper RWP14-013, February, 1–33Index