Philipp Kirst, Lawyer, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP, Germany and researcher, Rotterdam Institute of Law and Economics, Erasmus University Rotterdam, the Netherlands

‘This high-quality book is appreciated for its clear and justified methodology, its in-depth analyses, and its concrete proposals for improvement. The author accompanies the reader with numerous examples and offers a rich appendix to complement his comments. A book to be recommended without hesitation!’

• Contents: Preface 1. Introduction to the EU enforcement system and the goals of the Damages Directive PART I THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DAMAGES DIRECTIVE: A NEW LEVEL PLAYING FIELD IN EUROPE? 2. The implementation of the Damages Directive: harmonised rules on competition damages litigation in Europe? PART II CONTRIBUTION AMONG JOINT INFRINGERS OF COMPETITION LAW IN LIGHT OF THE DAMAGES DIRECTIVE 3. Lessons from the US: the no-contribution rule and its inapplicability in Europe 4. Getting contribution right: the allocation of liability among joint infringers of EU competition law based on relative responsibility 5. The quantification of the role in the cartel for the relativeresponsibility of joint infringers of EU competition law PART III THE IMPACT OF THE DAMAGES DIRECTIVE ON THE EU LENIENCY PROGRAMME 6. A missed opportunity to reconcile compensation of victims and leniency incentives PART IV THE NEED TO RECONCILE FINESAND DAMAGES FOLLOWING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DAMAGES DIRECTIVE 7. A new approach to the calculation of competition fines toreconcile fines and damages 8. Concluding remarks Index

Philipp Kirst, Lawyer, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP, Germany and researcher, Rotterdam Institute of Law and Economics, Erasmus University Rotterdam, the Netherlands

‘This high-quality book is appreciated for its clear and justified methodology, its in-depth analyses, and its concrete proposals for improvement. The author accompanies the reader with numerous examples and offers a rich appendix to complement his comments. A book to be recommended without hesitation!’

• Contents: Preface 1. Introduction to the EU enforcement system and the goals of the Damages Directive PART I THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DAMAGES DIRECTIVE: A NEW LEVEL PLAYING FIELD IN EUROPE? 2. The implementation of the Damages Directive: harmonised rules on competition damages litigation in Europe? PART II CONTRIBUTION AMONG JOINT INFRINGERS OF COMPETITION LAW IN LIGHT OF THE DAMAGES DIRECTIVE 3. Lessons from the US: the no-contribution rule and its inapplicability in Europe 4. Getting contribution right: the allocation of liability among joint infringers of EU competition law based on relative responsibility 5. The quantification of the role in the cartel for the relativeresponsibility of joint infringers of EU competition law PART III THE IMPACT OF THE DAMAGES DIRECTIVE ON THE EU LENIENCY PROGRAMME 6. A missed opportunity to reconcile compensation of victims and leniency incentives PART IV THE NEED TO RECONCILE FINESAND DAMAGES FOLLOWING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DAMAGES DIRECTIVE 7. A new approach to the calculation of competition fines toreconcile fines and damages 8. Concluding remarks Index

Philipp Kirst, Lawyer, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP, Germany and researcher, Rotterdam Institute of Law and Economics, Erasmus University Rotterdam, the Netherlands

‘This high-quality book is appreciated for its clear and justified methodology, its in-depth analyses, and its concrete proposals for improvement. The author accompanies the reader with numerous examples and offers a rich appendix to complement his comments. A book to be recommended without hesitation!’

• Contents: Preface 1. Introduction to the EU enforcement system and the goals of the Damages Directive PART I THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DAMAGES DIRECTIVE: A NEW LEVEL PLAYING FIELD IN EUROPE? 2. The implementation of the Damages Directive: harmonised rules on competition damages litigation in Europe? PART II CONTRIBUTION AMONG JOINT INFRINGERS OF COMPETITION LAW IN LIGHT OF THE DAMAGES DIRECTIVE 3. Lessons from the US: the no-contribution rule and its inapplicability in Europe 4. Getting contribution right: the allocation of liability among joint infringers of EU competition law based on relative responsibility 5. The quantification of the role in the cartel for the relativeresponsibility of joint infringers of EU competition law PART III THE IMPACT OF THE DAMAGES DIRECTIVE ON THE EU LENIENCY PROGRAMME 6. A missed opportunity to reconcile compensation of victims and leniency incentives PART IV THE NEED TO RECONCILE FINESAND DAMAGES FOLLOWING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DAMAGES DIRECTIVE 7. A new approach to the calculation of competition fines toreconcile fines and damages 8. Concluding remarks Index