Peter Burke is a pioneering cultural historian and author of over thirty books, including Eyewitnessing: The Uses of Images as Historical Evidence (Reaktion, 2019). His books have been translated into more than thirty languages. He is a Life Fellow of Emmanuel College, Cambridge, and a Fellow of the British Academy.

Burke proves his own connoisseurial skill . . . He concludes that the connoisseur still has a crucial role alongside, and not instead of, documentation. - Conrad Landin, Apollo MagazineNo one can say anything sensible about undocumented artworks without connoisseurship. This practice relies exclusively on judgments based on comparisons informed by feats of visual memory. But those judgments follow rules that do not necessarily capture actuality. It has taken an historian of Peter Burke’s acuity to analyze the development of a form of attention–connoisseurship that relies on questionable rules unacknowledged by those who follow them. Burke’s tour d’horizon is a tour de force. - Ivan Gaskell, Bard Graduate CenterPeter Burke sheds light on one of the most enigmatic and captivating aspects of the history of art. - Paolo Coen, University of TeramoThis magisterial history of social connoisseurship by a leading cultural historian covers the field in the last five hundred years. Following the codification of the methodology in the 17th and 18th centuries, Peter Burke presents a rich insight and critical assessment of the achievement, as well as the limitations, of the methodology in the development of modern art history over the last two hundred years. - Jean Michel Massing, King's College, CambridgePeter Burke’s brilliant and entertaining study provides a longue durée history of connoisseurship. From its origins among Renaissance artists judging one another’s work to the era of experts with immense memories, forensic powers of scrutiny, fearless chutzpah and, on occasion, malleable morals, it brings the story right up to date, examining how technical analysis, archival research, and artificial intelligence have joined—but not wholly replaced—the discerning eye. With his usual lucidity and balance, Burke queries the method of connoisseurship but does not deny its successes. - Paul Taylor, Warburg Institute

Peter Burke is a pioneering cultural historian and author of over thirty books, including Eyewitnessing: The Uses of Images as Historical Evidence (Reaktion, 2019). His books have been translated into more than thirty languages. He is a Life Fellow of Emmanuel College, Cambridge, and a Fellow of the British Academy.

Burke proves his own connoisseurial skill . . . He concludes that the connoisseur still has a crucial role alongside, and not instead of, documentation. - Conrad Landin, Apollo MagazineNo one can say anything sensible about undocumented artworks without connoisseurship. This practice relies exclusively on judgments based on comparisons informed by feats of visual memory. But those judgments follow rules that do not necessarily capture actuality. It has taken an historian of Peter Burke’s acuity to analyze the development of a form of attention–connoisseurship that relies on questionable rules unacknowledged by those who follow them. Burke’s tour d’horizon is a tour de force. - Ivan Gaskell, Bard Graduate CenterPeter Burke sheds light on one of the most enigmatic and captivating aspects of the history of art. - Paolo Coen, University of TeramoThis magisterial history of social connoisseurship by a leading cultural historian covers the field in the last five hundred years. Following the codification of the methodology in the 17th and 18th centuries, Peter Burke presents a rich insight and critical assessment of the achievement, as well as the limitations, of the methodology in the development of modern art history over the last two hundred years. - Jean Michel Massing, King's College, CambridgePeter Burke’s brilliant and entertaining study provides a longue durée history of connoisseurship. From its origins among Renaissance artists judging one another’s work to the era of experts with immense memories, forensic powers of scrutiny, fearless chutzpah and, on occasion, malleable morals, it brings the story right up to date, examining how technical analysis, archival research, and artificial intelligence have joined—but not wholly replaced—the discerning eye. With his usual lucidity and balance, Burke queries the method of connoisseurship but does not deny its successes. - Paul Taylor, Warburg Institute