Cybercrime in Context

Dr. Marleen Weulen Kranenbarg is an assistant professor at VU Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Her research mostly focuses on cyber-dependent offenders. In her doctoral dissertation she empirically compared traditional offenders to cyber-offenders on four important domains in criminology: 1. offending over the life-course, 2. personal and situational risk factors for offending and victimization, 3. similarity in deviance in the social network, and 4. motivations related to different offense clusters. She recently started a large-scale longitudinal study into actual vs. perceived cybercriminal behaviour of offline vs. online social ties among youth. Marleen is also a research fellow of the NSCR (Netherlands Institute for the Study of Crime and Law Enforcement), board member of the ESC Cybercrime Working Group, and part of the steering committee of the IIRCC (International Interdisciplinary Research Consortium on Cybercrime).Dr. Rutger Leukfeldt is Senior Researcher and the cybercrime cluster coordinator at the Netherlands Institute for the Study of Crime and Law Enforcement (NSCR) and Academic Director of Centre of Expertise Cybersecurity of the Hague University of Applied Sciences. His work focusses on the human factor in cybercrime and cybersecurity. Recent examples include studies into pathways into cybercrime, organized cybercrime and risk profiles of cybercrime victims. Over de past decade, Rutger worked on various studies for public and private organizations. Furthermore, he received a Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (EU grant for promising researchers) and a Veni grant (Dutch grant for highly promising researchers) to carry out a study into cybercriminal networks. Rutger is currently the chair of the Cybercrime Working Group of the European Society of Criminology (ESC).

• 1. Introduction.- 2. The Annual Conference on the Human Factor in Cybercrime: An analysis of participation in the 2018 and 2019 meetings.- 3. Cyber awareness versus actual online behaviour: a population based survey experiment.- 4. Susceptibility to Malware-Based Phishing and Smishing Attacks: An Experimental examination of the efficacy of thoughtfully reflective decision making and routine activities.- 5. No Gambles with Information Security: The Neuropsychology of a Ransomware Attack.- 6. Shifting the blame? Investigation of user compliance with digital payment regulations.- 7. The risk of an employee’s cyber misconduct on a Social Media Site: A potential threat factor for your organization’s brand reputation and business endurance.- 8. Situating the effects of cybercrime victimization within the scope public safety: An exploratory study.- 9. Show me the money! Identy fraud financial losses and victims' efforts for reimbursement.- 10. The Impact of CyberCrime: The Victims’ Perspectives.- 11. The Prevention of Financial Cybercrimes: What Do Clients Think?.- 12. Saint or Satan? Moral Development and Dark Triad Influences on Cyber-Criminal Intent.- 13. Cybercrime versus traditional crime: empirical evidence for clusters of offenses and related motivations.- 14. Gender Similarities (and Some Differences) Among Cybercrime Offenders Under Federal Supervision in the United States.- 15. Exploring the Role of Gender in Online Cybercrime Subcultures.- 16. Predicting the popularity of online account credentials advertisements.- 17. Child sexual exploitation communities on the Darkweb: How organized are they?.- 18. The Changing Division of Criminal Labour within the Modern Cybercrime Ecosystem.-19. Infrastructural power: mapping struggles over meaning, crime, and control in the Tor anonymity network.- 20. Law and Human Perspectives to Cybercrime Perpetration in Africa.- 21. Cybercrime reporting behaviors among small and medium-sized enterprises in the Netherlands.– 22. Textmining for cybercrime in registrations of the Dutch police.