Abu Ja`far said: It is a science to make the book, and they are the ones who claimed that the rulings of writing are evidence of the rulings of Sharia, because this is contrary to what is required by religion and reason, because writing is a branch It turns out that writing is a branch of religion, and it was not a branch of something that he did not show, and the rulings of writing are appropriate for the provisions of Sharia. The evidence for this is that if a Muslim revived a favorable land, the rule of the jurist and the writer in it would be either; Likewise, in what comes out of zakat from the ten and a half ten, as well as the ruling on alms from camels, cow and sheep, as well as the ruling in the pillars, the lion and the spoils. Some people have obligated the writer things that he is unable to, and leave things that he needs, but rather the tools of writing: calligraphy, rhetoric, knowledge of arranging the work of the bureaus, experience in the business sewers, and the path with the faces of money extracting, which resolves and can. These machines are not for one of them in itself, nor unilaterally in his name, but rather it is part of writing and inside its pillars. As for jurisprudence, statutes, and the manufacture of account and science in grammar, each of them is alone in his intensity, even if the writer needs things from them, towards what is written in a thousand and a ya and a bit of limb and the reward.
