Paul and Pseudepigraphy

Stanley E. Porter, Ph.D. (1988), University of Sheffield, is President and Dean, and Professor of New Testament, at McMaster Divinity College in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. He has edited each Pauline Studies volume and has published numerous monographs, edited volumes and peer-reviewed articles on a range of topics in New Testament, Greek language and linguistics, and especially Pauline studies.Gregory P. Fewster is a graduate of McMaster Divinity College and is an Adjunct Instructor at Great Lakes Bible College in Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. He is the author of Creation Language in Romans 8 (Brill) and serves as Associate Editor for the journal Biblical and Ancient Greek Linguistics.

"The Pauline Studies series edited by Porter has become an excellent collection covering a range of crucial aspects in the study of the Pauline corpus. [...] this volume is a welcome contribution to the study of Pauline pseudepigraphy." – Jason Maston, Highland Theological College, in: Religious Studies Review 41/2 (June 2015)"This is an extremely rich and unified volume, that will aid further research in this area. The editors are to be commended for Bringing together this rich collection of essays." - Paul Foster, University of Edinburgh, in: The Expository Times 130 (4), 2019

• Stanley E. Porter and Gregory P. Fewster. On Pauline Pseudepigraphy: An IntroductionI. Critical Issues in Pauline PseudepigraphyArmin D. Baum, Authorship and Pseudepigraphy in Early Christian Literature: A Translation of the Most Important Source Texts and an Annotated BibliographyStanley E. Porter, Pauline Chronology and the Question of Pseudonymity of the Pastoral EpistlesGregory P. Fewster, Hermeneutical Issues in Canonical Pseudepigrapha: The Head/Body Motif in the Pauline Corpus as a Test CaseAndrew W. Pitts, Style and Pseudonymity in Pauline ScholarshipH. J. van Ness, The Problem of the Pastoral Epistles: An Important Hypothesis ReconsideredII. Pauline Pseudepigraphy within the Christian CanonSigurd Grindheim, A Deutero-Pauline Mystery? Ecclesiology in Colossians and EphesiansChristina M. Kreinecker, The Imitation Hypothesis: Pseudepigraphic Remarks on 2 Thessalonians with Help from Documentary PapyriLinda L. Belleville, Christology, Greco-Roman Religious Piety, and the Pseudonymity of the Pastoral LettersClare K. Rothschild, Hebrews as an Instructional Appendix to RomansBryan R. Dyer, The Epistolary Closing of Hebrews and Pauline ImitationIII. Pauline Pseudepigraphy outside the Christian CanonPhilip L. Tite, Dusting off a Pseudo-Historical Letter: Re-thinking the Epistolary Aspects of the Apocryphal Epistle to the LaodiceansIlaria Ramelli, The Pseudepigraphical Correspondance between Seneca and Paul: A ReassessmentMichael Kaler, The Heretics’ Apostle and Two Pauline Pseudepigrapha from Nag Hammadi