Jon Stewart is a Research Fellow at the Institute of Philosophy of the Slovak Academy of Sciences. He has worked for many years in the field of nineteenth-century Continental philosophy with a specialization in Hegel and Kierkegaard.

• PrefaceAcknowledgmentsList of IllustrationsAbbreviationsIntroduction: The Left-Hegelian Period of the Danish Hegel ReceptionI The Shift to the New PeriodII Theses of the Present Tome1 The Straussian Threat: 1842I Brøchner’s Translation of Strauss and Its ReviewII Adler’s Review of Nielsen’s Speculative LogicIII The Danish Translation of Werder’s LogicIV Stilling’s Philosophical ObservationsV Schiern’s “On the Development and Present Standpoint of History Writing”VI Martensen’s “The Present Religious Crisis”VII Mynster’s Resumption of the Debate about MediationVIII Hagen’s “How Is Intelligence Displayed?”IX Hagen’s Review of Stilling’s Philosophical ConsiderationsX The Parody, Johan Ludvig Heiberg after DeathXI Beck’s Review of Kierkegaard’s The Concept of IronyXII Beck’s The Concept of MythXIII Kierkegaard’s “Public Confession”XIV Adler’s Hegelian LogicA Adler’s IntroductionB Adler’s Account of BeingC Adler’s Account of EssenceXV Heiberg’s “The People and the Public” and Thomsen’s ResponseXVI Scharling’s “The Struggle against Christianity in the Most Recent Time”XVII Nielsen’s “King and Constitution”XVIII The Criticism of Nielsen in “The Philosophical Politician”XIX Heiberg’s “The Starry Sky”XX Another Criticism of MartensenXXI Heiberg’s “Review of Dina”XXII Bornemann’s “Lectures on the History of the More Recent Philosophy of Right”XXIII Parts Three and Four of Nielsen’s Speculative Logic2 The Beginning of Kierkegaard’s Pseudonymous Authorship: 1843I Stilling’s Review of Martensen’s Outline to a System of Moral PhilosophyII Beck’s Review of Nielsen’s Treatise on the Speculative Method’s Treatment of Sacred HistoryIII The Review of Møller’s Posthumous WritingsIV Ludvig Helweg’s Article “On Faith and Knowledge”V Hagen’s Critical Response to HelwegVI Helweg’s Rejoinder to Hagen’s CriticismsVII Kierkegaard’s Either/OrA Hegelian MediationB The Inner and the OuterC The Use of Hegel’s Criteria for ArtD The Use of Hegel’s View of AntigoneE The Use of Hegel’s Unhappy ConsciousnessVIII Heiberg’s “Literary Winter Crops” and Kierkegaard’s ResponseIX The Discussion in Fædrelandet and Dagen about the Prussian Censorship of MarheinekeX Heiberg’s “Lyric Poetry”XI Heiberg’s “A Contribution to a Philosophy of the Visible”XII Hagen’s Review of Either/OrXIII Brøchner’s Some Remarks on BaptismXIV P.L. Møller’s Arena: A Polemical-Aesthetic JournalXV Friedrich Helweg’s Review of Adler’s LogicXVI Adler’s Anti-Hegelian RevelationXVII Heiberg’s “On the Principle of the Beginning of History”XVIII Kierkegaard’s Johannes Climacus, or De omnibus dubitandum estXIX Kierkegaard’s RepetitionXX Kierkegaard’s Fear and TremblingXXI Thomsen’s On Modern French PoetryXXII Sibbern’s On the Concept, Nature and Essence of PhilosophyXXIII Nielsen’s Lecture Paragraphs on the Philosophy of Church HistoryXXIV Winther’s Article on the Doctrine of Justification in the New TestamentXXV Beck’s Article on Hegel’s Concept of the Church3 The Conflict Surrounding Stilling’s Criticism of the Left Hegelians: 1844I Mynster’s “Church Polemic”II Clausen’s Development of the Main Christian DoctrinesIII Heiberg’s “The Astronomical Year”IV Friedrich Helweg’s “The Sign of Jonah and the Brazen Serpent”V Hagen’s Review of Fear and TremblingVI The Article “The German Press in Paris”VII Eiríksson’s On the Baptists and Child BaptismVIII Stilling’s Modern Atheism or the so-called Neo-Hegelianism’s Consequences of Hegelian PhilosophyA “Modern Science” in Relation to Hegel’s PhilosophyB “The Criticism of the Left HegeliansC “The Dissolution of Atheism in the FutureIX The Critical Responses to Stilling’s Modern AtheismA “The Beginning of the Debate: Gammeltoft’s On Academic AffairsB “Christens’ “Another Word about the Master’s Defense”C “Schiødte’s “Mr. Christens’ Word about the Master’s Defense”D “Hagen’s Defense of StillingE “Christens’ Responses to Schiødte and HagenF “Frederik Wilhelm Andersen’s Review of Stilling’s Modern AtheismX Kierkegaard’s Philosophical FragmentsA “The Absolute Paradox as a Response to MeditationB “Christianity and HistoryXI Kierkegaard’s The Concept of AnxietyA “The Confusion of Logic and ActualityB “Movement in Logic and the LeapXII Kierkegaard’s PrefacesA “Preface VII: A Satirical Account of MediationB “Preface VIII: A Demand for an Explanation of Hegel’s Philosophy4 The Debates about Feuerbach: 1845I Stilling’s Stay in BerlinII Christens’ “A Parallel between Two of the Recent Age’s Philosophers”III Nielsen’s Propaedeutic LogicIV Weis’ On the State and Its Individual: Introduction to JurisprudenceV Thomsen’s On Lord ByronVI Kierkegaard’s Stages on Life’s WayVII Beck’s Review of Kierkegaard’s Philosophical FragmentsVIII Hagen’s Marriage Regarded from an Ethical-Historical Point of ViewIX Brøchner’s On the Condition of the Jewish People in the Persian PeriodX The Satirical Article, “The Psychological Condition of the Potatoes during the Sick Period”5 The Culmination of Kierkegaard’s Campaign against the Hegelians: 1846I Kierkegaard’s Concluding Unscientific PostscriptA “Subjective Faith and Speculative PhilosophyB “Christianity as a Form of KnowingC “The System and ExistenceD “Speculative Philosophy’s Presuppositionless BeginningE “The Unity of Being and ThoughtF “The Sublation of the Law of Excluded MiddleG “The Lack of Ethics in Hegel’s SystemII Kierkegaard’s A Literary Review and Hegelian MediationIII Brøchner’s Stay in BerlinIV Sibbern’s Speculative CosmologyV Zeuthen’s Humanity Regarded from the Christian StandpointVI Kierkegaard’s The Book on AdlerA “Adler’s Hegelianism and ChristianityB “Adler’s Dramatic Break with HegelianismC “Adler and the Lack of Ethics in HegelVII Eiríksson’s Faith, Superstition and UnbeliefVIII The Critical Review of Eiríksson’s Faith, Superstition, and UnbeliefIX Eiríksson’s Dr. Martensen’s Published Moral Paragraphs6 The Rejection of Beck’s Application for the Priesthood: 1847–48I Beck’s Conflict with the Danish State ChurchII Hegel in Kierkegaard’s NB JournalsIII Varberg’s Assessment of the State of Philosophy in DenmarkIV Steenstrup’s The Study of Theology7 The Beginning of the Debate about Faith and Knowledge: 1849I Mynster’s On MemoryII Nielsen’s Gospel Faith and the Modern ConsciousnessIII Martensen’s Christian DogmaticsIV Kierkegaard’s The Sickness unto DeathA “Anti-Climacus’ Dialectical MethodologyB “The Attempt of Speculative Dogmatics to Comprehend Sin and Socratic IgnoranceC “The Individual and the RaceV Nielsen’s Comparison of Johannes Climacus with MartensenVI Magnús Eiríksson’s Speculative OrthodoxyVII Bornemann’s On the Significance of Protestant TheologyVIII P.C. Kierkegaard’s Speech at the Clerical Conference of RoskildeIX Stilling’s On the Imagined Reconciliation of Faith and Knowledge8 The Continuation of the Debate about Faith and Knowledge: 1850I Paludan-Müller’s Work on Martensen’s Christian DogmaticsII Scharling’s Review of Martensen’s Christian DogmaticsIII Ludvig Helweg’s “Prof. Martensen’s Dogmatics and Its  Critics”IV Eiríksson’s Is Faith a Paradox?V Nielsen’s The Faith of the Gospels and TheologyVI Nielsen’s and Stilling’s Responses to Scharling’s ReviewVII Martensen’s Dogmatic ElucidationsVIII Kierkegaard’s Practice in ChristianityIX The Debate between Dampe and Varberg on ReligionX Nielsen’s Renewed Criticism of Martensen’s Dogmatic Elucidations9 Hegel at the End of the Golden Age: 1851–55I Varberg’s Conflict between Ørsted and MynsterII Hagen’s “Studies in the History of Religion”III Bojesen’s Translation of Aristotle’s PoliticsIV Stilling’s Account of Research in Religion and ScienceV Steenstrup’s Philosophy of HistoryVI Sibbern’s Book Review and the Question of Actuality in HegelVII Friedrich Helweg’s Comparison of Adler and KierkegaardVIII Friedrich Helweg’s Article on Danish HegelianismIX The End of the Golden AgeBibliographyI Secondary Sources on the Danish Hegel ReceptionII Primary Texts and Sources UsedIII Secondary Literature and Material UsedIndex

Jon Stewart is a Research Fellow at the Institute of Philosophy of the Slovak Academy of Sciences. He has worked for many years in the field of nineteenth-century Continental philosophy with a specialization in Hegel and Kierkegaard.

• PrefaceAcknowledgmentsList of IllustrationsAbbreviationsIntroduction: The Left-Hegelian Period of the Danish Hegel ReceptionI The Shift to the New PeriodII Theses of the Present Tome1 The Straussian Threat: 1842I Brøchner’s Translation of Strauss and Its ReviewII Adler’s Review of Nielsen’s Speculative LogicIII The Danish Translation of Werder’s LogicIV Stilling’s Philosophical ObservationsV Schiern’s “On the Development and Present Standpoint of History Writing”VI Martensen’s “The Present Religious Crisis”VII Mynster’s Resumption of the Debate about MediationVIII Hagen’s “How Is Intelligence Displayed?”IX Hagen’s Review of Stilling’s Philosophical ConsiderationsX The Parody, Johan Ludvig Heiberg after DeathXI Beck’s Review of Kierkegaard’s The Concept of IronyXII Beck’s The Concept of MythXIII Kierkegaard’s “Public Confession”XIV Adler’s Hegelian LogicA Adler’s IntroductionB Adler’s Account of BeingC Adler’s Account of EssenceXV Heiberg’s “The People and the Public” and Thomsen’s ResponseXVI Scharling’s “The Struggle against Christianity in the Most Recent Time”XVII Nielsen’s “King and Constitution”XVIII The Criticism of Nielsen in “The Philosophical Politician”XIX Heiberg’s “The Starry Sky”XX Another Criticism of MartensenXXI Heiberg’s “Review of Dina”XXII Bornemann’s “Lectures on the History of the More Recent Philosophy of Right”XXIII Parts Three and Four of Nielsen’s Speculative Logic2 The Beginning of Kierkegaard’s Pseudonymous Authorship: 1843I Stilling’s Review of Martensen’s Outline to a System of Moral PhilosophyII Beck’s Review of Nielsen’s Treatise on the Speculative Method’s Treatment of Sacred HistoryIII The Review of Møller’s Posthumous WritingsIV Ludvig Helweg’s Article “On Faith and Knowledge”V Hagen’s Critical Response to HelwegVI Helweg’s Rejoinder to Hagen’s CriticismsVII Kierkegaard’s Either/OrA Hegelian MediationB The Inner and the OuterC The Use of Hegel’s Criteria for ArtD The Use of Hegel’s View of AntigoneE The Use of Hegel’s Unhappy ConsciousnessVIII Heiberg’s “Literary Winter Crops” and Kierkegaard’s ResponseIX The Discussion in Fædrelandet and Dagen about the Prussian Censorship of MarheinekeX Heiberg’s “Lyric Poetry”XI Heiberg’s “A Contribution to a Philosophy of the Visible”XII Hagen’s Review of Either/OrXIII Brøchner’s Some Remarks on BaptismXIV P.L. Møller’s Arena: A Polemical-Aesthetic JournalXV Friedrich Helweg’s Review of Adler’s LogicXVI Adler’s Anti-Hegelian RevelationXVII Heiberg’s “On the Principle of the Beginning of History”XVIII Kierkegaard’s Johannes Climacus, or De omnibus dubitandum estXIX Kierkegaard’s RepetitionXX Kierkegaard’s Fear and TremblingXXI Thomsen’s On Modern French PoetryXXII Sibbern’s On the Concept, Nature and Essence of PhilosophyXXIII Nielsen’s Lecture Paragraphs on the Philosophy of Church HistoryXXIV Winther’s Article on the Doctrine of Justification in the New TestamentXXV Beck’s Article on Hegel’s Concept of the Church3 The Conflict Surrounding Stilling’s Criticism of the Left Hegelians: 1844I Mynster’s “Church Polemic”II Clausen’s Development of the Main Christian DoctrinesIII Heiberg’s “The Astronomical Year”IV Friedrich Helweg’s “The Sign of Jonah and the Brazen Serpent”V Hagen’s Review of Fear and TremblingVI The Article “The German Press in Paris”VII Eiríksson’s On the Baptists and Child BaptismVIII Stilling’s Modern Atheism or the so-called Neo-Hegelianism’s Consequences of Hegelian PhilosophyA “Modern Science” in Relation to Hegel’s PhilosophyB “The Criticism of the Left HegeliansC “The Dissolution of Atheism in the FutureIX The Critical Responses to Stilling’s Modern AtheismA “The Beginning of the Debate: Gammeltoft’s On Academic AffairsB “Christens’ “Another Word about the Master’s Defense”C “Schiødte’s “Mr. Christens’ Word about the Master’s Defense”D “Hagen’s Defense of StillingE “Christens’ Responses to Schiødte and HagenF “Frederik Wilhelm Andersen’s Review of Stilling’s Modern AtheismX Kierkegaard’s Philosophical FragmentsA “The Absolute Paradox as a Response to MeditationB “Christianity and HistoryXI Kierkegaard’s The Concept of AnxietyA “The Confusion of Logic and ActualityB “Movement in Logic and the LeapXII Kierkegaard’s PrefacesA “Preface VII: A Satirical Account of MediationB “Preface VIII: A Demand for an Explanation of Hegel’s Philosophy4 The Debates about Feuerbach: 1845I Stilling’s Stay in BerlinII Christens’ “A Parallel between Two of the Recent Age’s Philosophers”III Nielsen’s Propaedeutic LogicIV Weis’ On the State and Its Individual: Introduction to JurisprudenceV Thomsen’s On Lord ByronVI Kierkegaard’s Stages on Life’s WayVII Beck’s Review of Kierkegaard’s Philosophical FragmentsVIII Hagen’s Marriage Regarded from an Ethical-Historical Point of ViewIX Brøchner’s On the Condition of the Jewish People in the Persian PeriodX The Satirical Article, “The Psychological Condition of the Potatoes during the Sick Period”5 The Culmination of Kierkegaard’s Campaign against the Hegelians: 1846I Kierkegaard’s Concluding Unscientific PostscriptA “Subjective Faith and Speculative PhilosophyB “Christianity as a Form of KnowingC “The System and ExistenceD “Speculative Philosophy’s Presuppositionless BeginningE “The Unity of Being and ThoughtF “The Sublation of the Law of Excluded MiddleG “The Lack of Ethics in Hegel’s SystemII Kierkegaard’s A Literary Review and Hegelian MediationIII Brøchner’s Stay in BerlinIV Sibbern’s Speculative CosmologyV Zeuthen’s Humanity Regarded from the Christian StandpointVI Kierkegaard’s The Book on AdlerA “Adler’s Hegelianism and ChristianityB “Adler’s Dramatic Break with HegelianismC “Adler and the Lack of Ethics in HegelVII Eiríksson’s Faith, Superstition and UnbeliefVIII The Critical Review of Eiríksson’s Faith, Superstition, and UnbeliefIX Eiríksson’s Dr. Martensen’s Published Moral Paragraphs6 The Rejection of Beck’s Application for the Priesthood: 1847–48I Beck’s Conflict with the Danish State ChurchII Hegel in Kierkegaard’s NB JournalsIII Varberg’s Assessment of the State of Philosophy in DenmarkIV Steenstrup’s The Study of Theology7 The Beginning of the Debate about Faith and Knowledge: 1849I Mynster’s On MemoryII Nielsen’s Gospel Faith and the Modern ConsciousnessIII Martensen’s Christian DogmaticsIV Kierkegaard’s The Sickness unto DeathA “Anti-Climacus’ Dialectical MethodologyB “The Attempt of Speculative Dogmatics to Comprehend Sin and Socratic IgnoranceC “The Individual and the RaceV Nielsen’s Comparison of Johannes Climacus with MartensenVI Magnús Eiríksson’s Speculative OrthodoxyVII Bornemann’s On the Significance of Protestant TheologyVIII P.C. Kierkegaard’s Speech at the Clerical Conference of RoskildeIX Stilling’s On the Imagined Reconciliation of Faith and Knowledge8 The Continuation of the Debate about Faith and Knowledge: 1850I Paludan-Müller’s Work on Martensen’s Christian DogmaticsII Scharling’s Review of Martensen’s Christian DogmaticsIII Ludvig Helweg’s “Prof. Martensen’s Dogmatics and Its  Critics”IV Eiríksson’s Is Faith a Paradox?V Nielsen’s The Faith of the Gospels and TheologyVI Nielsen’s and Stilling’s Responses to Scharling’s ReviewVII Martensen’s Dogmatic ElucidationsVIII Kierkegaard’s Practice in ChristianityIX The Debate between Dampe and Varberg on ReligionX Nielsen’s Renewed Criticism of Martensen’s Dogmatic Elucidations9 Hegel at the End of the Golden Age: 1851–55I Varberg’s Conflict between Ørsted and MynsterII Hagen’s “Studies in the History of Religion”III Bojesen’s Translation of Aristotle’s PoliticsIV Stilling’s Account of Research in Religion and ScienceV Steenstrup’s Philosophy of HistoryVI Sibbern’s Book Review and the Question of Actuality in HegelVII Friedrich Helweg’s Comparison of Adler and KierkegaardVIII Friedrich Helweg’s Article on Danish HegelianismIX The End of the Golden AgeBibliographyI Secondary Sources on the Danish Hegel ReceptionII Primary Texts and Sources UsedIII Secondary Literature and Material UsedIndex

Jon Stewart is a Research Fellow at the Institute of Philosophy of the Slovak Academy of Sciences. He has worked for many years in the field of nineteenth-century Continental philosophy with a specialization in Hegel and Kierkegaard.

• PrefaceAcknowledgmentsList of IllustrationsAbbreviationsIntroduction: The Left-Hegelian Period of the Danish Hegel ReceptionI The Shift to the New PeriodII Theses of the Present Tome1 The Straussian Threat: 1842I Brøchner’s Translation of Strauss and Its ReviewII Adler’s Review of Nielsen’s Speculative LogicIII The Danish Translation of Werder’s LogicIV Stilling’s Philosophical ObservationsV Schiern’s “On the Development and Present Standpoint of History Writing”VI Martensen’s “The Present Religious Crisis”VII Mynster’s Resumption of the Debate about MediationVIII Hagen’s “How Is Intelligence Displayed?”IX Hagen’s Review of Stilling’s Philosophical ConsiderationsX The Parody, Johan Ludvig Heiberg after DeathXI Beck’s Review of Kierkegaard’s The Concept of IronyXII Beck’s The Concept of MythXIII Kierkegaard’s “Public Confession”XIV Adler’s Hegelian LogicA Adler’s IntroductionB Adler’s Account of BeingC Adler’s Account of EssenceXV Heiberg’s “The People and the Public” and Thomsen’s ResponseXVI Scharling’s “The Struggle against Christianity in the Most Recent Time”XVII Nielsen’s “King and Constitution”XVIII The Criticism of Nielsen in “The Philosophical Politician”XIX Heiberg’s “The Starry Sky”XX Another Criticism of MartensenXXI Heiberg’s “Review of Dina”XXII Bornemann’s “Lectures on the History of the More Recent Philosophy of Right”XXIII Parts Three and Four of Nielsen’s Speculative Logic2 The Beginning of Kierkegaard’s Pseudonymous Authorship: 1843I Stilling’s Review of Martensen’s Outline to a System of Moral PhilosophyII Beck’s Review of Nielsen’s Treatise on the Speculative Method’s Treatment of Sacred HistoryIII The Review of Møller’s Posthumous WritingsIV Ludvig Helweg’s Article “On Faith and Knowledge”V Hagen’s Critical Response to HelwegVI Helweg’s Rejoinder to Hagen’s CriticismsVII Kierkegaard’s Either/OrA Hegelian MediationB The Inner and the OuterC The Use of Hegel’s Criteria for ArtD The Use of Hegel’s View of AntigoneE The Use of Hegel’s Unhappy ConsciousnessVIII Heiberg’s “Literary Winter Crops” and Kierkegaard’s ResponseIX The Discussion in Fædrelandet and Dagen about the Prussian Censorship of MarheinekeX Heiberg’s “Lyric Poetry”XI Heiberg’s “A Contribution to a Philosophy of the Visible”XII Hagen’s Review of Either/OrXIII Brøchner’s Some Remarks on BaptismXIV P.L. Møller’s Arena: A Polemical-Aesthetic JournalXV Friedrich Helweg’s Review of Adler’s LogicXVI Adler’s Anti-Hegelian RevelationXVII Heiberg’s “On the Principle of the Beginning of History”XVIII Kierkegaard’s Johannes Climacus, or De omnibus dubitandum estXIX Kierkegaard’s RepetitionXX Kierkegaard’s Fear and TremblingXXI Thomsen’s On Modern French PoetryXXII Sibbern’s On the Concept, Nature and Essence of PhilosophyXXIII Nielsen’s Lecture Paragraphs on the Philosophy of Church HistoryXXIV Winther’s Article on the Doctrine of Justification in the New TestamentXXV Beck’s Article on Hegel’s Concept of the Church3 The Conflict Surrounding Stilling’s Criticism of the Left Hegelians: 1844I Mynster’s “Church Polemic”II Clausen’s Development of the Main Christian DoctrinesIII Heiberg’s “The Astronomical Year”IV Friedrich Helweg’s “The Sign of Jonah and the Brazen Serpent”V Hagen’s Review of Fear and TremblingVI The Article “The German Press in Paris”VII Eiríksson’s On the Baptists and Child BaptismVIII Stilling’s Modern Atheism or the so-called Neo-Hegelianism’s Consequences of Hegelian PhilosophyA “Modern Science” in Relation to Hegel’s PhilosophyB “The Criticism of the Left HegeliansC “The Dissolution of Atheism in the FutureIX The Critical Responses to Stilling’s Modern AtheismA “The Beginning of the Debate: Gammeltoft’s On Academic AffairsB “Christens’ “Another Word about the Master’s Defense”C “Schiødte’s “Mr. Christens’ Word about the Master’s Defense”D “Hagen’s Defense of StillingE “Christens’ Responses to Schiødte and HagenF “Frederik Wilhelm Andersen’s Review of Stilling’s Modern AtheismX Kierkegaard’s Philosophical FragmentsA “The Absolute Paradox as a Response to MeditationB “Christianity and HistoryXI Kierkegaard’s The Concept of AnxietyA “The Confusion of Logic and ActualityB “Movement in Logic and the LeapXII Kierkegaard’s PrefacesA “Preface VII: A Satirical Account of MediationB “Preface VIII: A Demand for an Explanation of Hegel’s Philosophy4 The Debates about Feuerbach: 1845I Stilling’s Stay in BerlinII Christens’ “A Parallel between Two of the Recent Age’s Philosophers”III Nielsen’s Propaedeutic LogicIV Weis’ On the State and Its Individual: Introduction to JurisprudenceV Thomsen’s On Lord ByronVI Kierkegaard’s Stages on Life’s WayVII Beck’s Review of Kierkegaard’s Philosophical FragmentsVIII Hagen’s Marriage Regarded from an Ethical-Historical Point of ViewIX Brøchner’s On the Condition of the Jewish People in the Persian PeriodX The Satirical Article, “The Psychological Condition of the Potatoes during the Sick Period”5 The Culmination of Kierkegaard’s Campaign against the Hegelians: 1846I Kierkegaard’s Concluding Unscientific PostscriptA “Subjective Faith and Speculative PhilosophyB “Christianity as a Form of KnowingC “The System and ExistenceD “Speculative Philosophy’s Presuppositionless BeginningE “The Unity of Being and ThoughtF “The Sublation of the Law of Excluded MiddleG “The Lack of Ethics in Hegel’s SystemII Kierkegaard’s A Literary Review and Hegelian MediationIII Brøchner’s Stay in BerlinIV Sibbern’s Speculative CosmologyV Zeuthen’s Humanity Regarded from the Christian StandpointVI Kierkegaard’s The Book on AdlerA “Adler’s Hegelianism and ChristianityB “Adler’s Dramatic Break with HegelianismC “Adler and the Lack of Ethics in HegelVII Eiríksson’s Faith, Superstition and UnbeliefVIII The Critical Review of Eiríksson’s Faith, Superstition, and UnbeliefIX Eiríksson’s Dr. Martensen’s Published Moral Paragraphs6 The Rejection of Beck’s Application for the Priesthood: 1847–48I Beck’s Conflict with the Danish State ChurchII Hegel in Kierkegaard’s NB JournalsIII Varberg’s Assessment of the State of Philosophy in DenmarkIV Steenstrup’s The Study of Theology7 The Beginning of the Debate about Faith and Knowledge: 1849I Mynster’s On MemoryII Nielsen’s Gospel Faith and the Modern ConsciousnessIII Martensen’s Christian DogmaticsIV Kierkegaard’s The Sickness unto DeathA “Anti-Climacus’ Dialectical MethodologyB “The Attempt of Speculative Dogmatics to Comprehend Sin and Socratic IgnoranceC “The Individual and the RaceV Nielsen’s Comparison of Johannes Climacus with MartensenVI Magnús Eiríksson’s Speculative OrthodoxyVII Bornemann’s On the Significance of Protestant TheologyVIII P.C. Kierkegaard’s Speech at the Clerical Conference of RoskildeIX Stilling’s On the Imagined Reconciliation of Faith and Knowledge8 The Continuation of the Debate about Faith and Knowledge: 1850I Paludan-Müller’s Work on Martensen’s Christian DogmaticsII Scharling’s Review of Martensen’s Christian DogmaticsIII Ludvig Helweg’s “Prof. Martensen’s Dogmatics and Its  Critics”IV Eiríksson’s Is Faith a Paradox?V Nielsen’s The Faith of the Gospels and TheologyVI Nielsen’s and Stilling’s Responses to Scharling’s ReviewVII Martensen’s Dogmatic ElucidationsVIII Kierkegaard’s Practice in ChristianityIX The Debate between Dampe and Varberg on ReligionX Nielsen’s Renewed Criticism of Martensen’s Dogmatic Elucidations9 Hegel at the End of the Golden Age: 1851–55I Varberg’s Conflict between Ørsted and MynsterII Hagen’s “Studies in the History of Religion”III Bojesen’s Translation of Aristotle’s PoliticsIV Stilling’s Account of Research in Religion and ScienceV Steenstrup’s Philosophy of HistoryVI Sibbern’s Book Review and the Question of Actuality in HegelVII Friedrich Helweg’s Comparison of Adler and KierkegaardVIII Friedrich Helweg’s Article on Danish HegelianismIX The End of the Golden AgeBibliographyI Secondary Sources on the Danish Hegel ReceptionII Primary Texts and Sources UsedIII Secondary Literature and Material UsedIndex