Dr. Karsten Wentink started his studies in 2001 at the Faculty of Archaeology, Leiden University. He did a combined bachelors in both archaeological sciences (focus on functional analysis at the Laboratory for Artefact studies) and prehistoric archaeology (with a focus on the Neolithic of North-West Europe). He finished his Masters thesis in 2006 on Neolithic flint axe depositions. He started his PhD research in 2008 focussing on the role of grave sets in Corded Ware and Bell Beaker funerary practices.

• Beyond Barrows – an introductionBy David Fontijn*Inventions of Memory and Meaning – Examples of Late Iron Age Reuse of Bronze Age Monuments in South-Western Sweden-By Tore Artelius†Part I (Beyond monumentality)Memorious Monuments. Place persistency, mortuary practice and memory in the Lower Rhine Area wetlands (5500-2500 cal BC)By Luc W.S.W. AmkreutzThe centrality of urnfields. Second thoughts on structure and stability of Late Bronze Age and Early Iron Age cultural landscapes in the Low Countries.By Roy van Beek and Arjan LouwenPart II Orderings of funerary landscapesDöserygg and Skegrie. Megalithic centres in south-west Scania, southern SwedenBy Magnus Andersson and Björn WallebomPost alignments in the barrow cemeteries of Oss-Vorstengraf and Oss-ZevenbergenBy Harry FokkensPart III Zooming out: barrows in a landscapeBronze Age barrow research in Sandy Flanders (NW Belgium): an overviewBy Jeroen De Reu and Jean Bourgeoishistory of open space. Barrow landscapes and the significance of heaths – the case of the Echoput barrowsBy Marieke DoorenboschWays of Wandering – In the Late Bronze Age Barrow Landscape of the Himmerland-area, DenmarkBy Mette LøvschalPart IV monument-building – an evolutionary approachThe Bet-Hedging Model as an Explanatory Framework for the Evolution of Mound Building in the Southeastern United StatesBy Evan Peacock and Janet Rafferty

Dr. Karsten Wentink started his studies in 2001 at the Faculty of Archaeology, Leiden University. He did a combined bachelors in both archaeological sciences (focus on functional analysis at the Laboratory for Artefact studies) and prehistoric archaeology (with a focus on the Neolithic of North-West Europe). He finished his Masters thesis in 2006 on Neolithic flint axe depositions. He started his PhD research in 2008 focussing on the role of grave sets in Corded Ware and Bell Beaker funerary practices.

• Beyond Barrows – an introductionBy David Fontijn*Inventions of Memory and Meaning – Examples of Late Iron Age Reuse of Bronze Age Monuments in South-Western Sweden-By Tore Artelius†Part I (Beyond monumentality)Memorious Monuments. Place persistency, mortuary practice and memory in the Lower Rhine Area wetlands (5500-2500 cal BC)By Luc W.S.W. AmkreutzThe centrality of urnfields. Second thoughts on structure and stability of Late Bronze Age and Early Iron Age cultural landscapes in the Low Countries.By Roy van Beek and Arjan LouwenPart II Orderings of funerary landscapesDöserygg and Skegrie. Megalithic centres in south-west Scania, southern SwedenBy Magnus Andersson and Björn WallebomPost alignments in the barrow cemeteries of Oss-Vorstengraf and Oss-ZevenbergenBy Harry FokkensPart III Zooming out: barrows in a landscapeBronze Age barrow research in Sandy Flanders (NW Belgium): an overviewBy Jeroen De Reu and Jean Bourgeoishistory of open space. Barrow landscapes and the significance of heaths – the case of the Echoput barrowsBy Marieke DoorenboschWays of Wandering – In the Late Bronze Age Barrow Landscape of the Himmerland-area, DenmarkBy Mette LøvschalPart IV monument-building – an evolutionary approachThe Bet-Hedging Model as an Explanatory Framework for the Evolution of Mound Building in the Southeastern United StatesBy Evan Peacock and Janet Rafferty

Dr. Karsten Wentink started his studies in 2001 at the Faculty of Archaeology, Leiden University. He did a combined bachelors in both archaeological sciences (focus on functional analysis at the Laboratory for Artefact studies) and prehistoric archaeology (with a focus on the Neolithic of North-West Europe). He finished his Masters thesis in 2006 on Neolithic flint axe depositions. He started his PhD research in 2008 focussing on the role of grave sets in Corded Ware and Bell Beaker funerary practices.

• Beyond Barrows – an introductionBy David Fontijn*Inventions of Memory and Meaning – Examples of Late Iron Age Reuse of Bronze Age Monuments in South-Western Sweden-By Tore Artelius†Part I (Beyond monumentality)Memorious Monuments. Place persistency, mortuary practice and memory in the Lower Rhine Area wetlands (5500-2500 cal BC)By Luc W.S.W. AmkreutzThe centrality of urnfields. Second thoughts on structure and stability of Late Bronze Age and Early Iron Age cultural landscapes in the Low Countries.By Roy van Beek and Arjan LouwenPart II Orderings of funerary landscapesDöserygg and Skegrie. Megalithic centres in south-west Scania, southern SwedenBy Magnus Andersson and Björn WallebomPost alignments in the barrow cemeteries of Oss-Vorstengraf and Oss-ZevenbergenBy Harry FokkensPart III Zooming out: barrows in a landscapeBronze Age barrow research in Sandy Flanders (NW Belgium): an overviewBy Jeroen De Reu and Jean Bourgeoishistory of open space. Barrow landscapes and the significance of heaths – the case of the Echoput barrowsBy Marieke DoorenboschWays of Wandering – In the Late Bronze Age Barrow Landscape of the Himmerland-area, DenmarkBy Mette LøvschalPart IV monument-building – an evolutionary approachThe Bet-Hedging Model as an Explanatory Framework for the Evolution of Mound Building in the Southeastern United StatesBy Evan Peacock and Janet Rafferty