Justice tears continue to bleed due to the orchestrated façade of powertionist egalitarianism within the global criminal justice system. The establishment of the International Criminal Court was intended to halt the perpetration of international crimes and the culture of impunity, both of which erode accountability within the framework of criminal justice. However, the Court contradicts its fundamental philosophy, illustrating its vast deviation from its original principles. Instead, it operates as a tool of the largest and most influential governments, solely to advance their own interests while shifting blame onto others. The embrace of the concept of international criminal vacations gravely tarnishes the standards of justice on a global scale, akin to a wart on its integrity. This perspective doesn''t merely criticise the international criminal justice system cynically; rather, it regrettably exposes a lamentable contemporary ideology at the core of the Court''s crucial role. The Court was established to uphold the violated rights of victims in its judgments, not to bestow a license upon criminals. This unveiling sheds light on the characteristics of a cartelised assembly of puppet prosecutors and judges within the Court who, under the guise of humanitarian justice, indoctrinate the global populace to uphold their absurd authoritarian statutes. A comparative analysis of the Court''s practices reveals the shortfall in moral wisdom that it delivers. This starkly implies that the true face of international criminal jurisprudence involves mass victim deaths due to weaponry, sanctions, or the granting of international vacations without prosecuting the wrongdoers. Thus, these vacations embody the most perilous ongoing crime, leading to a flood of victims'' tears.
